2 research outputs found
W49A North - Global or Local or No Collapse?
We attempt to fit observations with 5" resolution of the J=2-1 transition of
CS in the directions of H II regions A, B, and G of W49A North as well as
observations with 20" resolution of the J=2-1, 3-2, 5-4, and 7-6 transitions in
the directions of H II regions A and G by using radiative transfer
calculations. These calculations predict the intensity profiles resulting from
several spherical clouds along the line of sight. We consider three models:
global collapse of a very large (5 pc radius) cloud, localized collapse from
smaller (1 pc) clouds around individual H II regions, and multiple, static
clouds. For all three models we can find combinations of parameters that
reproduce the CS profiles reasonably well provided that the component clouds
have a core-envelope structure with a temperature gradient. Cores with high
temperature and high molecular hydrogen density are needed to match the higher
transitions (e.g. J=7-6) observed towards A and G. The lower temperature, low
density gas needed to create the inverse P-Cygni profile seen in the CS J=2-1
line (with 5" beam) towards H II region G arises from different components in
the 3 models. The infalling envelope of cloud G plus cloud B creates the
absorption in global collapse, cloud B is responsible in local collapse, and a
separate cloud, G', is needed in the case of many static clouds. The exact
nature of the velocity field in the envelopes for the case of local collapse is
not important as long as it is in the range of 1 to 5 km/s for a turbulent
velocity of about 6 km/s. High resolution observations of the J=1-0 and 5-4
transitions of CS and C34S may distinguish between these three models. Modeling
existing observations of HCO+ and C18O does not allow one to distinguish
between the three models but does indicate the existence of a bipolar outflow.Comment: 42 pages, 27 figures, accepted for publication in the ApJS August
2004, v153 issu