John hopkins anesthesiology handbook/ Heitmiller

x, 533 hal. : ill.; 15 cm

John hopkins anesthesiology handbook/ Heitmiller

x, 533 hal. : ill.; 15 cm

Perioperative Harm Index facilitates prioritization of improvement initiatives.

© 2019 Elsevier Inc. Introduction: Perioperative services constitute a significant portion of the care delivery, the impact, and the potential risk in healthcare organizations. Tremendous attention has been paid towards hospital-acquired conditions; however perioperative services have not received similar attention. There is a need for a standardized manner to report on conditions in perioperative services which facilitates prioritization of quality improvement initiatives. Materials and methods: Preventable harm and quality of care indicators were selected based on a review of the literature and available datasets, as well as from safety and quality measures in our organization. Metrics were derived from myriad national quality improvement initiatives and collaboratives. A structure was created to obtain the metrics in a near real-time manner and present the Perioperative Harm Index across the organization. Specific initiatives were targeted as necessitating immediate, short-term, or longer duration prioritization for improvement initiatives. Results: A Perioperative Harm Index was created using 11 metrics that represent the spectrum of surgical care. The metrics facilitate prioritization of improvement initiatives and have resulted in improvement projects including perioperative normothermia in neonatal intensive care unit patients having procedures in the operating room, reduction of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and decrease in surgical site infections in selected procedures. Conclusions: A Perioperative Harm Index facilitates immediate shared understanding of the harm resulting from the care of surgical patients. As such, this index enables rapid and rationale prioritization for improvement activities. Our harm index is shared, is broadly generalizable, and has facilitated prioritization of improvement opportunities and appropriate allocation of improvement resources at our organization. Levels of Evidence: Level V

Perioperative Harm Index facilitates prioritization of improvement initiatives

© 2019 Elsevier Inc. Introduction: Perioperative services constitute a significant portion of the care delivery, the impact, and the potential risk in healthcare organizations. Tremendous attention has been paid towards hospital-acquired conditions; however perioperative services have not received similar attention. There is a need for a standardized manner to report on conditions in perioperative services which facilitates prioritization of quality improvement initiatives. Materials and methods: Preventable harm and quality of care indicators were selected based on a review of the literature and available datasets, as well as from safety and quality measures in our organization. Metrics were derived from myriad national quality improvement initiatives and collaboratives. A structure was created to obtain the metrics in a near real-time manner and present the Perioperative Harm Index across the organization. Specific initiatives were targeted as necessitating immediate, short-term, or longer duration prioritization for improvement initiatives. Results: A Perioperative Harm Index was created using 11 metrics that represent the spectrum of surgical care. The metrics facilitate prioritization of improvement initiatives and have resulted in improvement projects including perioperative normothermia in neonatal intensive care unit patients having procedures in the operating room, reduction of post-operative nausea and vomiting, and decrease in surgical site infections in selected procedures. Conclusions: A Perioperative Harm Index facilitates immediate shared understanding of the harm resulting from the care of surgical patients. As such, this index enables rapid and rationale prioritization for improvement activities. Our harm index is shared, is broadly generalizable, and has facilitated prioritization of improvement opportunities and appropriate allocation of improvement resources at our organization. Levels of Evidence: Level V

Achieving Greater Health Equity: An Opportunity for Anesthesiology

Anesthesiology and anesthesiologists have a tremendous opportunity and responsibility to eliminate health disparities and to achieve health equity. We thus examine health disparity and health equity through the lens of anesthesiology and the perspective of anesthesiologists. In this paper, we define health disparity and health care disparities and provide tangible, representative examples of the latter in the practice of anesthesiology. We define health equity, primarily as the desired antithesis of health disparity. Finally, we propose a framework for anesthesiologists, working toward mitigating health disparity and health care disparities, advancing health equity, and documenting improvements in health care access and health outcomes. This multilevel and interdependent framework includes the perspectives of the patient, clinician, group or department, health care system, and professional societies, including medical journals. We specifically focus on the interrelated roles of social identity and social determinants of health in health outcomes. We explore the foundational role that clinical informatics and valid data collection on race and ethnicity have in achieving health equity. Our ability to ensure patient safety by considering these additional patient-specific factors that affect clinical outcomes throughout the perioperative period could substantially reduce health disparities. Finally, we explore the role of medical journals and their editorial boards in ameliorating health disparities and advancing health equity