Incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing minimally invasive valve surgery

BackgroundWe hypothesize that minimally invasive valve surgery in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is superior to a conventional median sternotomy.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1945 consecutive patients who underwent isolated valve surgery. Included were patients with CKD stages 2 to 5. In-hospital mortality, composite complication rates, and intensive care unit and total hospital lengths of stay of those who underwent a minimally invasive approach were compared with those who underwent a standard median sternotomy. Resource use was approximated based on intensive care unit and total hospital lengths of stay.ResultsThere were 688 patients identified; 510 (74%) underwent minimally invasive surgery, and 178 (26%) underwent a median sternotomy. There was no significant difference in mortality. Minimally invasive surgery was associated with fewer composite complications (33.1% vs 49.4%; odds ratio, 0.5; P ≤ .001), shorter intensive care unit (48 [interquartile range {IQR}, 33-74] hours vs 71 [IQR, 42-96] hours; P < .01), and hospital (8 [IQR, 6-9] days vs 10 [IQR, 8-15] days; P < .001) lengths of stay, and a lower incidence of acute kidney injury (8% vs 14.7%; odds ratio, 0.5; P = .01), compared with median sternotomy. In a multivariable analysis, minimally invasive surgery was associated with a 60% reduction in the risk of development of postoperative acute kidney injury.ConclusionsIn patients with CKD undergoing isolated valve surgery, minimally invasive valve surgery is associated with reduced postoperative complications and lower resource use

Late Intervention on an Occluded Infarct-Related Artery: A Meta-analysis of the Randomized Controlled Trials

Context Late intervention to open an occluded infarct-related artery (IRA) after initial acute myocardial infarction was postulated to lead to clinical benefit. Objective To conduct a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Study Selection Eligibility criteria were: 1) randomized trials comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a totally occluded artery (TIMI flow 0-1) versus medical therapy, 2) in stable post myocardial infarction (MI) patients without spontaneous or low level exercise induced ischemia, 3) trials with a time from the onset of symptoms to randomization >24 hours, but <6 weeks, and 4) trials reporting mortality and recurrent MI as an endpoint. Of 961 citations reviewed, 3 disagreements were easily resolved by discussion and 6 trials were selected for inclusion. Data Synthesis The primary endpoint was the composite of recurrent MI or death. The secondary endpoints were the development of heart failure or recurrent myocardial infarction. In a meta-analysis of the 6 trials, which included 2642 patients, late intervention of an IRA had a RR of death or recurrent MI of 1.12 (95% CI 0.91-1.38). Data regarding the development of heart failure was available for 4 trials. In a meta-analysis of these 4 trials, which included 2527 patients, late intervention of an IRA had a RR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.58-1.08). Data regarding the occurrence of recurrent MI was available for 5 trials. In a meta-analysis of these 5 trials, which included 2598 patients, late intervention of an IRA had a RR of 1.28 (95% CI 0.91-1.79). Conclusions Our meta-analysis of the currently available randomized data addressing late intervention of an occluded IRA failed to reveal clinical benefit with regard to the clinical endpoints of death, heart failure or reinfarction. The trend towards an increase in reinfarction among the PCI treated patients suggested by the Open Artery Trial (OAT) investigators persisted, but did not achieve statistical significance