Visually guided inspiration breath-hold facilitated with nasal high flow therapy in locally advanced lung cancer

Background and purpose Reducing breathing motion in radiotherapy (RT) is an attractive strategy to reduce margins and better spare normal tissues. The objective of this prospective study (NCT03729661) was to investigate the feasibility of irradiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with visually guided moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (IBH) using nasal high-flow therapy (NHFT). Material and methods Locally advanced NSCLC patients undergoing photon RT were given NHFT with heated humidified air (flow: 40 L/min with 80% oxygen) through a nasal cannula. IBH was monitored by optical surface tracking (OST) with visual feedback. At a training session, patients had to hold their breath as long as possible, without and with NHFT. For the daily cone beam CT (CBCT) and RT treatment in IBH, patients were instructed to keep their BH as long as it felt comfortable. OST was used to analyze stability and reproducibility of the BH, and CBCT to analyze daily tumor position. Subjective tolerance was measured with a questionnaire at 3 time points. Results Of 10 included patients, 9 were treated with RT. Seven (78%) completed the treatment with NHFT as planned. At the training session, the mean BH length without NHFT was 39 s (range 15-86 s), and with NHFT 78 s (range 29-223 s) (p = .005). NHFT prolonged the BH duration by a mean factor of 2.1 (range 1.1-3.9s). The mean overall stability and reproducibility were within 1 mm. Subjective tolerance was very good with the majority of patients having no or minor discomfort caused by the devices. The mean inter-fraction tumor position variability was 1.8 mm (-1.1-8.1 mm;SD 2.4 mm). Conclusion NHFT for RT treatment of NSCLC in BH is feasible, well tolerated and significantly increases the breath-hold duration. Visually guided BH with OST is stable and reproducible. We therefore consider this an attractive patient-friendly approach to treat lung cancer patients with RT in BH

STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR): the Standardized Treatment and Outcome Platform for Stereotactic Therapy Of Re-entrant tachycardia by a Multidisciplinary consortium (STOPSTORM.eu) and review of current patterns of STAR practice in Europe

The EU Horizon 2020 Framework-funded Standardized Treatment and Outcome Platform for Stereotactic Therapy Of Re-entrant tachycardia by a Multidisciplinary (STOPSTORM) consortium has been established as a large research network for investigating STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) for ventricular tachycardia (VT). The aim is to provide a pooled treatment database to evaluate patterns of practice and outcomes of STAR and finally to harmonize STAR within Europe. The consortium comprises 31 clinical and research institutions. The project is divided into nine work packages (WPs): (i) observational cohort; (ii) standardization and harmonization of target delineation; (iii) harmonized prospective cohort; (iv) quality assurance (QA); (v) analysis and evaluation; (vi, ix) ethics and regulations; and (vii, viii) project coordination and dissemination. To provide a review of current clinical STAR practice in Europe, a comprehensive questionnaire was performed at project start. The STOPSTORM Institutions' experience in VT catheter ablation (83% ≥ 20 ann.) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (59% > 200 ann.) was adequate, and 84 STAR treatments were performed until project launch, while 8/22 centres already recruited VT patients in national clinical trials. The majority currently base their target definition on mapping during VT (96%) and/or pace mapping (75%), reduced voltage areas (63%), or late ventricular potentials (75%) during sinus rhythm. The majority currently apply a single-fraction dose of 25 Gy while planning techniques and dose prescription methods vary greatly. The current clinical STAR practice in the STOPSTORM consortium highlights potential areas of optimization and harmonization for substrate mapping, target delineation, motion management, dosimetry, and QA, which will be addressed in the various WPs

Verifying tumor position during stereotactic body radiation therapy delivery using (limited-arc) cone beam computed tomography imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Proof of tumor position during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivery is desirable. We investigated if cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans reconstructed from (collimated) fluoroscopic kV images acquired during irradiation could show the dominant tumor position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Full-arc CBCT scans were reconstructed using FDK filtered back projection from 38kV fluoroscopy datasets (16 patients) continuously acquired during volumetric modulated spine SBRT. CBCT-CT match values were compared to the average spine offset values found using template matching+triangulation of the individual kV images. Multiple limited-arc CBCTs were reconstructed from fluoroscopic images acquired during lung SBRT of an anthropomorphic thorax phantom using 20-180° arc lengths and for 3 breath-hold lung SBRT patients. RESULTS: Differences between 3D CBCT-CT match results and average spine offsets found using template matching+triangulation were 0.1±0.1mm for all directions (range: 0.0-0.5mm). For limited-arc CBCTs of the thorax phantom, the automatic 3D CBCT-CT match results for arc lengths of 80-180° were ≤1mm. 20° CBCT reconstruction still allowed for positional verification in 2D. CONCLUSIONS: (Limited-arc) CBCT reconstructions of kV images acquired during irradiation can identify the dominant position of the tumor during treatment delivery

The impact of organ-at-risk contour variations on automatically generated treatment plans for NSCLC

Background and purpose: Quality of automatic contouring is generally assessed by comparison with manual delineations, but the effect of contour differences on the resulting dose distribution remains unknown. This study evaluated dosimetric differences between treatment plans optimized using various organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring methods. Materials and methods: OARs of twenty lung cancer patients were manually and automatically contoured, after which user-adjustments were made. For each contour set, an automated treatment plan was generated. The dosimetric effect of intra-observer contour variation and the influence of contour variations on treatment plan evaluation and generation were studied using dose-volume histogram (DVH)-parameters for thoracic OARs. Results: Dosimetric effect of intra-observer contour variability was highest for Heart Dmax (3.4 ± 6.8 Gy) and lowest for Lungs-GTV Dmean (0.3 ± 0.4 Gy). The effect of contour variation on treatment plan evaluation was highest for Heart Dmax (6.0 ± 13.4 Gy) and Esophagus Dmax (8.7 ± 17.2 Gy). Dose differences for the various treatment plans, evaluated on the reference (manual) contour, were on average below 1 Gy/1%. For Heart Dmean, higher dose differences were found for overlap with PTV (median 0.2 Gy, 95% 1.7 Gy) vs. no PTV overlap (median 0 Gy, 95% 0.5 Gy). For Dmax-parameters, largest dose difference was found between 0–1 cm distance to PTV (median 1.5 Gy, 95% 4.7 Gy). Conclusion: Dose differences arising from automatic contour variations were of the same magnitude or lower than intra-observer contour variability. For Heart Dmean, we recommend delineation errors to be corrected when the heart overlaps with the PTV. For Dmax-parameters, we recommend checking contours if the distance is close to PTV (<5 cm). For the lungs, only obvious large errors need to be adjusted

Feasibility of markerless 3D position monitoring of the central airways using kilovoltage projection images: Managing the risks of central lung stereotactic radiotherapy

Background and purpose: Central lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can cause proximal bronchial tree (PBT) toxicity. Information on PBT position relative to the high-dose could aid risk management. We investigated template matching + triangulation for high-frequency markerless 3D PBT position monitoring. Materials and methods: Kilovoltage projections of a moving phantom (full-fan cone-beam CT [CBCT, 15 frames/second] without MV irradiation: 889 images/dataset + CBCT and 7 frames/second fluoroscopy with MV irradiation) and ten patients undergoing free-breathing stereotactic/hypofractionated lung irradiation (full-fan CBCT without MV irradiation, 470–500 images/dataset) were retrospectively analyzed. 2D PBT reference templates (1 filtered digitally reconstructed radiograph/°) were created from planning CT data. Using normalized cross-correlation, templates were matched to projection images for 2D position. Multiple registrations were triangulated for 3D position. Results: For the phantom, 2D right/left PBT position could be determined in 86.6/75.1% of the CBCT dataset without MV irradiation, and 3D position (excluding first 20° due to the minimum triangulation angle) in 84.7/72.7%. With MV irradiation, this was up to 2% less. For right/left PBT, root-mean-square errors of measured versus “known” position were 0.5/0.8, 0.4–0.5/0.7, and 0.4/0.5–0.6 mm for left–right, superior–inferior, and anterior–posterior directions, respectively. 2D PBT position was determined in, on average, 89.8% of each patient dataset (range: 79.4–99.2%), and 3D position (excluding first 20°) in 85.1% (range: 67.9–99.6%). Motion was mainly superior–inferior (range: 4.5–13.6 mm, average: 8.5 mm). Conclusions: High-frequency 3D PBT position verification during free-breathing is technically feasible using markerless template matching + triangulation of kilovoltage projection images acquired during gantry rotation. Applications include organ-at-risk position monitoring during central lung SBRT

First Experience With Markerless Online 3D Spine Position Monitoring During SBRT Delivery Using a Conventional LINAC

Purpose: The purpose was to report our initial experience with online markerless 3-dimensional (3D) spine position monitoring. We used template matching plus triangulation of fluoroscopic kilovoltage images acquired with the gantry-mounted imager during flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc spine stereotactic body radiation therapy delivery on a conventional linear accelerator. Methods and Materials: Kilovoltage images were acquired at 7 frames per second and streamed to a stand-alone computer. Two-dimensional templates (1/°) containing the clinical target volume were generated from planning computed tomography (CT) data before the first fraction and matched to the (prefiltered) kilovoltage images during treatment. Each 2-dimensional registration was triangulated with multiple previous registrations, resulting in the 3D spine position offset from the planned position in real time during treatment. If the offset was more than a certain threshold, the treatment was manually stopped and a cone beam CT scan was acquired to reposition the patient. Results: During irradiation of 10 fractions in 3 patients, images were analyzed at an average rate of 1.0 to 1.3 frames per second; all other frames were excluded from the analysis because of limitations in processing speed. As a result of the start-up period of triangulation and poorer image quality at the start of treatment (lateral imaging angles), the first 3D position was determined after an average of 4.9 seconds. On the basis of the position results, we interrupted the treatment beam 2 times for different patients. In all cases the spine position results corresponded well with the CT–cone beam CT match values used for subsequent repositioning. Conclusions: For the first time, we have determined the spine position during stereotactic body radiation therapy delivery on a standard linear accelerator using the gantry-mounted kilovoltage imager. This has the potential to increase confidence in the treatment, and the need for 2 treatment interruptions demonstrates the benefit of monitoring during irradiation. However, software improvements are needed to increase processing speed

Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics

Background and purpose: Radiotherapy centers frequently lack simple tools for periodic treatment plan verification and feedback on current plan quality. It is difficult to measure treatment quality over different years or during the planning process. Here, we implemented plan quality assurance (QA) by developing a database of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics and a prediction model. These tools were used to assess automatically optimized treatment plans for rectal cancer patients, based on cohort analysis. Material and methods: A treatment plan QA framework was established and an overlap volume histogram based model was used to predict DVH parameters for cohorts of patients treated in 2018 and 2019 and grouped according to planning technique. A training cohort of 22 re-optimized treatment plans was used to make the prediction model. The prediction model was validated on 95 automatically generated treatment plans (automatically optimized cohort) and 93 manually optimized plans (manually optimized cohort). Results: For the manually optimized cohort, on average the prediction deviated less than 0.3 ± 1.4 Gy and -4.3 ± 5.5 Gy, for the mean doses to the bowel bag and bladder, respectively; for the automatically optimized cohort a smaller deviation was observed: -0.1 ± 1.1 Gy and -0.2 ± 2.5 Gy, respectively. The interquartile range of DVH parameters was on average smaller for the automatically optimized cohort, indicating less variation within each parameter compared to manual planning. Conclusion: An automated framework to monitor treatment quality with a DVH prediction model was successfully implemented clinically and revealed less variation in DVH parameters for automated in comparison to manually optimized plans. The framework also allowed for individual feedback and DVH estimation

Clinical implementation and validation of an automated adaptive workflow for proton therapy

Background and purpose: Treatment quality of proton therapy can be monitored by repeat-computed tomography scans (reCTs). However, manual re-delineation of target contours can be time-consuming. To improve the workflow, we implemented an automated reCT evaluation, and assessed if automatic target contour propagation would lead to the same clinical decision for plan adaptation as the manual workflow. Materials and methods: This study included 79 consecutive patients with a total of 250 reCTs which had been manually evaluated. To assess the feasibility of automated reCT evaluation, we propagated the clinical target volumes (CTVs) deformably from the planning-CT to the reCTs in a commercial treatment planning system. The dose-volume-histogram parameters were extracted for manually re-delineated (CTVmanual) and deformably mapped target contours (CTVauto). It was compared if CTVmanual and CTVauto both satisfied/failed the clinical constraints. Duration of the reCT workflows was also recorded. Results: In 92% (N = 229) of the reCTs correct flagging was obtained. Only 4% (N = 9) of the reCTs presented with false negatives (i.e., at least one clinical constraint failed for CTVmanual, but all constraints were satisfied for CTVauto), while 5% (N = 12) of the reCTs led to a false positive. Only for one false negative reCT a plan adaption was made in clinical practice, i.e., only one adaptation would have been missed, suggesting that automated reCT evaluation was possible. Clinical introduction hereof led to a time reduction of 49 h (from 65 to 16 h). Conclusion: Deformable target contour propagation was clinically acceptable. A script-based automatic reCT evaluation workflow has been introduced in routine clinical practice