13 research outputs found
Data World Does Not Lack Standards
When I first read the Call for Papers for this special issue, I was dismayed to find this line
within it:
“However, the world of data lacks the ingrained standards and practices the library
and academic community have built up over the years.”
It is true that there are many standards and practices for data depending on the discipline
in which the research is done. Because data themselves are more varied in their format
than publications such as books and journal articles, standards for data are necessarily
more varied and complex than those describing print publications. Whereas social science
survey data must discuss sampling techniques and any weighting procedures and provide
questionnaires, astronomy data has quite different concerns: frequency bands, equipment
specifications and calibration, and spectra measurements. Consequently the standards
involved may feel less “ingrained” to those who are not deeply involved in the research of
different disciplines. And, too, librarians may be less familiar with standards that apply in
parts of the research lifecycle in which they have tended to be less involved. Every library
student knows MARC, but that is a standard used primarily in the dissemination stage of
research, not in the data collection stage. Standards in data may also be more in flux than
those for publications, particularly recently, given the rapid evolution of mandates for data
sharing and their effect on disciplines that have no existing tradition of open access
Pioneers in the Wild West: Managing Data Collections
During the last few years, many academic libraries have accepted the challenge of helping
their users locate and acquire the numeric data they need. To meet their users’ ever-increasing
need for data, librarians are purchasing data sets one at a time (“small data”). This service, though
important to our users, raises many issues in the areas of collection scope, acquisition procedures,
and discovery and access. The authors conducted a survey of data librarians in summer 2015 and
followed up by interviewing five data librarians in depth to report on how academic libraries
collect and manage small data and to explore the strengths and weaknesses of various approaches
Data Librarianship: A Day in the Life - Science Edition
The authors conducted a survey of and interviews with data librarians in the sciences about their education, continuing education, services and tools. The book chapter presents a summary of both. This dataset represents only the de-identified survey responses, and is in Excel format
Appendices for book chapter, An Approach to Supporting Teaching with Data in the Social Sciences
Three methodological appendices for the chapter titled, An Approach to Supporting Teaching with Data in the Social Sciences within the book titled, Academic Libraries as Partners in Data Science Ecosystems, eds., N. Mani & M. Cawley. Included are Appendix 1, the semi-structured interview guide; Appendix 2, the email invitation to participate with which we recruited individual faculty; and Appendix 3, the consent to participate form
An Approach to Supporting Teaching With Data in the Social Sciences
Book chapter in Handbook of Research on Academic Libraries as Partners in Data Science Ecosystems (Chapter 11, p. 209-232). This work describes the results of the authors' research in association with the Ithaka S+R project, together with advice for libraries just beginning to explore offering data services. The national report for that project, Fostering Data Literacy, is available at https://sr.ithaka.org/publications/fostering-data-literacy/
Appendix C Survey Instrument
The survey instrument used for this study, created and run in Qualtrics. The instrument was exported to Word format for deposit and lightly reformatted for readability
Appendix D: Code Files
The R code (create-analysis-data.R) with which analysis was performed and the markdown file (Analysis.Rmd) with which tables and graphs were created
A Day in the Life: Science Edition, dataset
The authors conducted a survey of and interviews with data librarians in the sciences about their education, continuing education, services and tools. The book chapter presents a summary of both. This dataset represents only the de-identified survey responses, and is in Excel format