42 research outputs found

    Factors impacting social media users' information behavior: The concept of social noise

    Get PDF
    Social media communication involves the discussion and sharing of information in an environment subject to the influence of online relationships and perceived expectations of those in the social network. The ability to filter the resulting noise depends largely on our understanding of Social Noise and its underlying constructs. We introduce the concept of Social Noise and investigate methods of identifying it using a quantitative, data analytics approach. Understanding this phenomenon has taken on increasing importance as it can influence attitudes and behavior surrounding social issues, political campaigns, and other core areas of society. Results from the topic modeling and data clustering techniques represent part of ongoing research into Social Noise and general keywords and combinations of keywords related to its underlying constructs

    Barriers to the Adoption of EHR in GCC Countries: Exploratory Study

    Get PDF
    Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have become a focus of research in health informatics due to the increasing awareness of its importance in healthcare. The call for use and adoption of EHR systems by governments around the world and in the GCC countries in particular have increased over the years in an effort to improve healthcare, reduce cost and ensure patient safety. This study examines to the challenges and barriers affecting the use and adoption of EHR by GCC countries. Investigation and analysis are based on research studies, health reports, and published data by GCC countries in the last ten years. The results revealed repeating patterns and themes with regard to the challenges and barriers to the implementation of EHR systems in the GCC countries. We hope the findings from the study would benefit healthcare institutions in GCC countries in their efforts of overcoming the challenges and barriers to the use and adoption of EHR systems

    Teaching and Learning the Ninth Principle of the ALA Code of Ethics

    Get PDF
    In 2021 the American Library Association (ALA) Council approved a ninth principle to be added to the ALA Code of Ethics. The principle reads, “We affirm the inherent dignity and rights of every person. We work to recognize and dismantle systemic and individual biases; to confront inequity and oppression; to enhance diversity and inclusion; and to advance racial and social justice in our libraries, communities, profession, and associations through awareness, advocacy, education, collaboration, services, and allocation of resources and spaces.” This principle is in keeping with the Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE) Ethical Guidelines for Library and Information Science Educators: “As LIS educators, we respect and uphold academic freedom and protect the freedom to learn and to teach. We resist censorship and actively promote access to diverse points of view.” In both instances the primary thrust is equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization, and justice. This panel addresses the ALA Code of Ethics, with special attention to the ninth principle. The panelists will address the core meaning of the principle to determine what it portends for education for library and information professionals. The principle is designed to guide action though praxis. The panelists will examine the degree to which that objective is met by the principle, as well as a set of questions related to the principle: How praxis can address systemic inequity and oppression; how diversity and inclusion manifests itself in praxis; how the advancement of racial and social justice through education can be introduced in the workplace; and how the insertion of these goals can be made into the institutions in which graduates work. The matter of the pressures in which educators work related to racial and social justice work will also be brought up. Throughout the investigation of these matters, the overarching concern of the panelists will be the insertion of the matters into the educational milieu. The panelists will bring to the fore their extensive knowledge and experience in their examination. They will not only provide analyses of the elements of the ninth principle, but will raise questions about the implementation of the principle into the education of professionals. The panel presenters and their talk titles are: (1) John Budd, The Ninth Principle and Global Ethics: The Case for Global Ethics; (2) Suliman Hawamdeh and Michele A. L. Villagran, Multiculturalism and the Role of Information Ethics in Dealing with Academic Integrity Issues; and, (3) Bharat Mehra, “White Pricks” (a.k.a. Inoculations Against Racism) to Decenter Shades of White Privilege in a Professional Association’s Leadership Networks of LIS Educators. Facilitated by John Burgess, delegate for Information Ethics SIG convenor Toni Samek, the panelists will engage the audience in a discussion of the meaning of the ninth principle, but will also have the opportunity to compare it with the ALISE guideline and to offer suggestions regarding the implementation of the tenets of the principle into education (including which kinds of curricular elements are best suited to the insertion of the ALA Code of Ethics into instruction and discussion)

    Formulating a Communication Strategy for Effective Knowledge Sharing

    Get PDF
    Overcoming cultural resistance from a workforce and gaining sufficient buy-in from senior management are both critical to the successful implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) initiatives in any organization. The main purpose of this study is to identify an effective communication strategy at the onset of the implementation process, aimed at helping the workforce to comprehend the need for KM in the organization and to solicit maximum support from the senior management and staff alike. It is based on a case study of the KM initiatives in Singapore’s Civil Service College, a training school for public officials. The strategy will also facilitate effective communication between staff so that effective knowledge sharing can take place and provide proactive and reactive communication, to achieve acceptance of and commitment to KM in the organization. The communication strategy was formulated using inputs collected from focus group discussions and observational field work.Yeshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guideline

    Archival learning in a global context

    Get PDF
    The Archival / Preservation Education SIG panel explores ongoing developments and innovative classroom pedagogy in teaching preservation and archival studies. Panel includes four presentations of 15 minutes each plus moderated Q&A. Presentations address the role and outcomes of original research assignments, teaching preservation online, a networked curriculum survey, and developing digital hands-on learning experiences; presenters bring perspectives from four states. “Stepping into Original Research in Archival Practice” by Sarah Buchanan discusses application of the SAA GPAS framework to the design of an Archival Studies specialization in concert with programmatic student learning outcomes. The presentation assesses the role, origins, and outcomes of two years of students' original research papers on local/global issues and considers gaps in archival curricular studies and research on the archival profession. “The Challenges of Teaching Preservation Online: Best Practices and Lessons Learned” by Reem Alkhaledi and Suliman Hawamdeh considers the preservation of three types of materials: physical printed formats, electronic material such as films, videos, and microforms, and digital material stored in databases and digital repositories. Presenters discuss the challenges involved in teaching preservation online and the ability to provide rich content. “A Networked Survey of Archival Studies Curriculum: A Case Study from Queens College, CUNY” by Johnathan Thayer asks how do we best facilitate and navigate connections between students with global information contexts and work environments? The presenter reviews the results of a two-part GSLIS survey and invites participants’ perspectives, ultimately seeking to extend our networks as archival educators beyond the walls of our classrooms (physical or virtual) and into an increasingly competitive and global job market. “Online Archival Education and the Challenge of Meeting Experiential Learning Expectations” by Ayoung Yoon and Andrea Copeland discusses the process and strategies of developing an online archives management specialization as a part of a 100% online master's program. Our institution has employed strategies used in the online master’s program and developed several new strategies while still conveying core archival concepts and theories. The moderator facilitates Q&A within and across the four presentations
    corecore