Candida and Porphyromonas gingivalis: the effect on wound closure in vitro

Microorganisms play a role in oral mucositis after cancer therapy. The current study explored the hypothesis that Candida spp. alone and together with Porphyromonas gingivalis cause delayed healing of oral ulcerations due to the inhibition of wound closure. An in vitro scratch assay model was used to study the influence of viable and heat-killed Candida glabrata, Candida kefyr, and Candida albicans on cell migration of oral epithelial cells. Separately, the effect of conditioned medium of Candida spp. and the effect of a mixed infection of Candida spp. with P. gingivalis on wound closure was studied. In the presence of 10 viable C. glabrata or C. kefyr versus one epithelial cell, with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10, the relative closure of the scratch was 26% and 17%, respectively. At a MOI of 1, this was 60% for C. glabrata and 78% for C. kefyr. The inhibition of oral epithelial cell migration challenged with either C. glabrata or C. kefyr together with P. gingivalis was stronger than the inhibition caused by one of both organisms separately. Candida spp. inhibit cell migration in vitro. A combination of Candida spp. and P. gingivalis inhibited cell migration more than either microorganism separatel

Exploring the role of oral microorganisms in the pathogenesis of mucositis by assessing their impact on metabolic activity and reproductive capacity of epithelial cells in vitro

Purpose: Clinical and in vitro studies showed selected oral microorganisms to be related to delayed wound healing and ulcerative oral mucositis. However, it is not known whether this effect is due to reduced metabolism and/or the reduced reproductive capacity of epithelial cells. Therefore, we studied the influence of the oral microorganisms Porphyromonas gingivalis, Candida glabrata, and Candida kefyr on cell metabolism and reproductive capacity of oral epithelial cells, aimed to further unravel the pathogenesis of oral mucositis. Methods: Oral epithelial cells were exposed to different concentrations of P. gingivalis, C. glabrata, and C. kefyr as mono-infections or mixed together. An MTT assay was performed to determine the effect on cell metabolism. A clonogenic assay was used to study the effect on the reproductive capacity of oral epithelial cells. Results: The metabolism of oral epithelial cells was reduced when the microorganisms were present in high concentrations: P. gingivalis at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1000 and the Candida spp. at MOI 100. No statistical difference was observed in the ability of a single epithelial cell to grow into a colony of cells between control and P. gingivalis, C. glabrata, and C. kefyr, independent of the concentrations and combinations used. Conclusion: P. gingivalis, C. glabrata, and C. kefyr lowered the metabolic activity of oral epithelial cells in high concentrations, yet they did not influence the reproductive capacity of epithelial cells. Their impact on ulcerative oral mucositis is likely due to an effect on the migration, proliferation, and metabolism of epithelial cells

Oral chronic graft-versus-host disease: What the general dental practitioner needs to know

Background: Long-term survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation will increasingly seek care from dental providers. Methods: The authors highlight the importance of minimizing oral symptoms and complications associated with oral chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD). Results: Chronic GVHD is the result of an immune response of donor-derived cells against recipient tissues. Oral cGVHD can affect the mucosa and damage salivary glands and cause sclerotic changes. Symptoms include sensitivity and pain, dry mouth, taste changes, and limited mouth opening. Risk of developing caries and oral cancer is increased. Food intake, oral hygiene, and dental interventions can represent challenges. Oral cGVHD manifestations and dental interventions should be managed in close consultation with the medical team, as systemic treatment for cGVHD can have implications for dental management. Conclusions: General dental practitioners can contribute substantially to alleviating oral cGVHD involvement and preventing additional oral health deterioration. Practical Implications: Frequent examinations, patient education, oral hygiene reinforcement, dry mouth management, caries prevention, and management of dental needs are indicated. In addition, oral physical therapy might be needed. Invasive dental interventions should be coordinated with the transplantation team. Screening for oral malignancies is important even years after resolution of GVHD symptoms. Management of the oral manifestations of cGVHD might require referral to an oral medicine professional

A systematic review of dental disease management in cancer patients

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review aims to update on the prevalence of odontogenic-related infections and the efficacy of dental strategies in preventing dental-related complications in cancer patients since the 2010 systematic review. REVIEW METHOD: A literature search was conducted in the databases MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE for articles published between 1 January 2009 and 30 June 2016. Each study was assessed by 2 reviewers and the body of evidence for each intervention was assigned an evidence level. RESULTS: After examination of the abstracts and full-text articles, 59 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. The weighted prevalence of dental infections and pericoronitis during cancer therapy was 5.4 and 5.3%, respectively. The frequency of dental-related infections during intensive chemotherapy after complete, partial, and minimal pre-cancer dental evaluation/treatment protocols ranged from 0 to 4%. Protocols involving third molars extractions had the highest complications (40%). CONCLUSIONS: In view of the low prevalence of infections and the potential for complications after third molar extractions, it is suggested that partial dental evaluation/treatment protocols prior to intensive chemotherapy; whereby minor caries (within dentin), asymptomatic third molars or asymptomatic teeth without excessive probing depth (<8 mm), mobility (mobility I or II) or with periapical lesions of <5 mm were observed; is a viable option when there is insufficient time for complete dental evaluation/treatment protocols. The use of chlorhexidine, fluoride mouth rinses as well as composite resin, resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC), and amalgam restorations over conventional GIC in post head and neck radiation patients who are compliant fluoride users is recommended

A systematic review of dental disease management in cancer patients

10.1007/s00520-017-3829-ySUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER261155-17

Microbial changes in relation to oral mucositis in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients

The aim of this prospective, two center study was to investigate the dynamics of the microbial changes in relation to the development of ulcerative oral mucositis in autologous SCT (autoSCT) recipients. Fifty-one patients were diagnosed with multiple myeloma and treated with high-dose melphalan followed by autoSCT. They were evaluated before, three times weekly during hospitalization, and three months after autoSCT. At each time point an oral rinse was collected and the presence or absence of ulcerative oral mucositis (UOM) was scored (WHO scale). Oral microbiome was determined by using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing and fungal load by qPCR. Twenty patients (39%) developed UOM. The oral microbiome changed significantly after autoSCT and returned to pre-autoSCT composition after three months. However, changes in microbial diversity and similarity were more pronounced and rapid in patients who developed UOM compared to patients who did not. Already before autoSCT, different taxa discriminated between the 2 groups, suggesting microbially-driven risk factors. Samples with high fungal load (>0.1%) had a significantly different microbial profile from samples without fungi. In conclusion, autoSCT induced significant and reversible changes in the oral microbiome, while patients who did not develop ulcerative oral mucositis had a more resilient microbial ecosystem