Comparative feeding and foraging behaviour of the biocontrol agents Chilocorus spp. (Coccinellidae)

Thesis (Ph.D.)-University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, 1991.This study focuses on the effective biocontrol agent Chilocorus nigritus (Fabricius). Its behaviour and ecology were compared with other Chilocorus spp. where appropriate, to elucidate why this species is such an effective biocontrol agent, and how to improve methodology for its deployment as a natural enemy. An artificial diet for C. nigritus was developed, but was still sub-optimal. Asterolecanium miliaris (Boisduval) was a suitable prey for all life stages of C. nigritus and the adults of Chilocorus bipustulatus (Linnaeus) and Chilocorus infernalis Mulsant, but was inadequate for larvae of the last two species. Adult weight, measured at one day after adult eclosion, was an appropriate indicator of the effects of larval treatment on their development and on the fitness of subsequent adults. There was no improvement in culture vigour due to a behavioural response of individuals within one generation to fluctuating as opposed to constant temperature. starvation for between 10h and 24h was appropriate for standardisation of hunger. Measuring feeding rate at a range of static temperatures did not reflect differences in the climatic adaptations of six Chilocorus spp., but mortality rates at increasingly high temperatures were useful. Chilocorus spp. showed little ability to choose between prey species. Prey substitutions adversely affected adults and larvae. Introduction of adults was the most effective method for field establishment. Giant bamboo Dendrocalamus giganteus Munro was a valuable site for field releases of C. nigritus, but less useful for C. bipustulatus and C. infernalis. Counter to assumptions on which interference models have been based, no significant intraspecific interference, reducing predatory efficiency, was observed. Visually prominent features on the horizon and a specific leaf shape, were attractive to foraging C. nigritus. The location of prey patches by adults was facilitated by prey odour, but not so for larvae. Adults detected individual prey olfactorily and visually over short distances, but physical contact was required for detection by larvae. Prey location by larvae and adults was facilitated by alterations in movement patterns in response to prey consumption. Differences in prey detection and the effects of prey substitutions, between the life stages, were related to field behaviour. The relevance to biological control, of responses to rearing conditions and feeding and foraging behaviour, was investigated

The host status of lemons for the false codling moth, Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick)(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with particular reference to export protocols

The South African citrus industry is dependent on export of fresh fruit to many markets around the world, with approximately 70% of South Africa's citrus crop being exported (CGA 2013). The false codling moth, Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), is recorded as a pest of citrus fruit in southern Africa (Newton 1998; Grout and Moore 2015). As a result of its endemism to sub-Saharan Africa (Moore 2002), certain export markets of importance for the South African citrus industry, such as Peoples Republic of China, U.S.A. and South Korea, regulate it as a quarantine pest.Control of the pest in the field can be highly effective, using a suite of integrated control options, applied with diligent management (Moore and Hattingh 2012). These can succeed in reducing T. leucotreta infestation by 97% or more (Moore et al. 2015). Such an integrated system, using the sterile insect technique as the mainstay of the programme, has succeeded in reducing moth catches by 99%, fruit infestation by 96% and export rejections by 89% in the Western Cape Province of South Africa, since the inception of the programme in 2007 (Barnes et al. 2015)

The effects of postharvest treatments and sunlight exposure on the reproductive capability and viability of Phyllosticta citricarpa in citrus black spot fruit lesions

CITATION: Moyo, P. et al. 2020. The effects of postharvest treatments and sunlight exposure on the reproductive capability and viability of Phyllosticta citricarpa in citrus black spot fruit lesions. Plants, 9(12):1813, doi:10.3390/plants9121813.The original publication is available at https://www.mdpi.comCitrus black spot (CBS) is caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa, which is classified as a quarantine organism in certain countries whose concerns are that CBS-infected fruit may be a pathway for introduction of the pathogen. This study evaluated the reproductive capability and viability of P. citricarpa under simulated conditions in which the whole fruit, peel segments, or citrus pulp with CBS lesions were discarded. Naturally infected ‘Midknight’ Valencia orange and ‘Eureka’ lemon fruit, either treated using standard postharvest sanitation, fungicide, and wax coating treatments or untreated, were placed into cold storage for 5 weeks (oranges at 4 ◦C and lemons at 7 ◦C). Thereafter, treated and untreated fruit were incubated for a further 2 weeks at conditions conducive for CBS symptom expression and formation of pycnidia. The ability of pycnidia to secrete viable pycnidiospores after whole fruit and peel segments or peel pieces from citrus pulp were exposed to sunlight at warm temperatures (±28 ◦C) and ±75% relative humidity levels was then investigated. The combination of postharvest treatments and cold storage effectively controlled CBS latent infections (>83.6% control) and pycnidium formation (<1.4% of lesions formed pycnidia), and the wax coating completely inhibited pycnidiospore release in fruit and peel segments. Pycnidiospores were secreted only from lesions on untreated fruit and peel segments and at low levels (4.3–8.6%) from peel pieces from pulped treated fruit. However, spore release rapidly declined when exposed to sunlight conditions (1.4% and 0% after 2 and 3 days, respectively). The generally poor reproductive ability and viability of CBS fruit lesions on harvested fruit, particularly when exposed to sunlight conditions, supports the conclusion that citrus fruit without leaves is not an epidemiologically significant pathway for the entry, establishment, and spread of P. citricarpa.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/12/1813Publisher's versio

Scientific critique of the paper “Climatic distribution of citrus black spot caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa. A historical analysis of disease spread in South Africa” by Martínez-Minaya et al. (2015)

The global distribution of citrus black spot (CBS) disease, caused by Phyllosticta citricarpa, is climatically constrained, which is evident from its occurrence in citrus growing areas with warm, summer rainfall and its absence from areas with cooler, Mediterranean-type winter rainfall. Various epidemiological and modelling studies have supported this observation, predominantly estimating unsuitability for P. citricarpa in Mediterranean type climates, with no more than marginal suitability estimated at a few localities within some regions with Mediterranean type climates. The study by Martínez-Minaya et al. (European Journal of Plant Pathology, 143, 69–83, 2015), describes an historic sequence of recorded CBS occurrence in parts of South Africa, conducts an autocorrelation analysis and a correlative analysis with Köppen-Geiger climate zones and makes observations about the occurrence of certain Köppen-Geiger climate zones in the European Union. The study suggests that significant portions of the European Union and the broader Mediterranean basin are climatically similar to warm, summer rainfall areas in South Africa where P. citricarpa persists and causes CBS disease and concludes that the potential distribution of P. citricarpa is less constrained by climatic factors than spatial contagion. However, in this critique we expose methodological shortcomings in the Martínez-Minaya et al. (European Journal of Plant Pathology, 143, 69–83, 2015) study and conclude that the study grossly overestimated the extent of the geographical area that could support P. citricarpa, thereby rendering the findings scientifically unreliable

Citrus black spot is absent in the Western Cape, Northern Cape and Free State Provinces

The South African citrus industry is strongly focused on exports and South Africa is a signatory member of both the World Trade Organisation Agreement on the application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and the International Plant Protection Convention. Citrus black spot, caused by Guignardia citricarpa, does not occur in all the South African citrus production areas and, therefore, South Africa has a responsibility to provide those trading partners that have identified G. citricarpa as a regulated pest with reliable information about the distribution of citrus black spot within South Africa. Detection surveys were conducted in citrus production areas in the Western Cape, Northern Cape and Free State Provinces and appropriate diagnostic protocols were used to ensure reliable detection of G. citricarpa. Trees in commercial orchards and home gardens on farms and in towns of 17, 9 and 5 magisterial districts in the Western Cape, Northern Cape and Free State Provinces, respectively, were sampled between 1995 and 2010. Fruit samples were taken during June and July, and leaf samples from November to January. None of the 3060 fruit and leaf samples collected during these surveys tested positive for G. citricarpa. Phyllosticta capitalensis, a non-pathogenic, ubiquitous, endophytic species was, however, detected during these surveys. In compliance with relevant International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures and based on the outcome of these official surveys, these three provinces in South Africa can be recognised as citrus black spot pest free areas

Citrus black spot is absent in the Western Cape, Northern Cape and Free State Provinces

The South African citrus industry is strongly focused on exports and South Africa is a signatory member of both the World Trade Organisation Agreement on the application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and the International Plant Protection Convention. Citrus black spot, caused by Guignardia citricarpa, does not occur in all the South African citrus production areas and, therefore, South Africa has a responsibility to provide those trading partners that have identified G. citricarpa as a regulated pest with reliable information about the distribution of citrus black spot within South Africa. Detection surveys were conducted in citrus production areas in the Western Cape, Northern Cape and Free State Provinces and appropriate diagnostic protocols were used to ensure reliable detection of G. citricarpa. Trees in commercial orchards and home gardens on farms and in towns of 17, 9 and 5 magisterial districts in the Western Cape, Northern Cape and Free State Provinces, respectively, were sampled between 1995 and 2010. Fruit samples were taken during June and July, and leaf samples from November to January. None of the 3060 fruit and leaf samples collected during these surveys tested positive for G. citricarpa. Phyllosticta capitalensis, a non-pathogenic, ubiquitous, endophytic species was, however, detected during these surveys. In compliance with relevant International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures and based on the outcome of these official surveys, these three provinces in South Africa can be recognised as citrus black spot pest free areas

Citrus black spot is absent in the Western Cape, Northern Cape and Free State Provinces

CITATION: Carstens, E. et al. 2012. Citrus black spot is absent in the Western Cape, Northern Cape and Free State Provinces. South African Journal of Science, 108(7/8), Art. #876, doi: 10.4102/sajs.v108i7/8.876.The original publication is available at http://sajs.co.zaThe South African citrus industry is strongly focused on exports and South Africa is a signatory member of both the World Trade Organisation Agreement on the application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and the International Plant Protection Convention. Citrus black spot, caused by Guignardia citricarpa, does not occur in all the South African citrus production areas and, therefore, South Africa has a responsibility to provide those trading partners that have identified G. citricarpa as a regulated pest with reliable information about the distribution of citrus black spot within South Africa. Detection surveys were conducted in citrus production areas in the Western Cape, Northern Cape and Free State Provinces and appropriate diagnostic protocols were used to ensure reliable detection of G. citricarpa. Trees in commercial orchards and home gardens on farms and in towns of 17, 9 and 5 magisterial districts in the Western Cape, Northern Cape and Free State Provinces, respectively, were sampled between 1995 and 2010. Fruit samples were taken during June and July, and leaf samples from November to January. None of the 3060 fruit and leaf samples collected during these surveys tested positive for G. citricarpa. Phyllosticta capitalensis, a non-pathogenic, ubiquitous, endophytic species was, however, detected during these surveys. In compliance with relevant International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures and based on the outcome of these official surveys, these three provinces in South Africa can be recognised as citrus black spot pest free areas.http://sajs.co.za/citrus-black-spot-absent-western-cape-northern-cape-and-free-state-provinces/carstens-elma-le-roux-hendrik-holtzhausen-michael-van-rooyen-liezl-coetzee-joey-wentzel-riaPublisher's versio