31 research outputs found

    Evaluation of calibration factor of OSLD toward eye lens exposure dose measurement of medical staff during IVR

    Get PDF
    The eye lens is a sensitive organ of which an x‐ray exposure dose should be managed during interventional radiology (IVR). In the actual situations, the eye lens is exposed to scattered x‐rays; they have different from the standard x‐ray energies which are used for general dose calibration of the dosimeter. To perform precise dose measurement, the energy dependence of the dosimeter should be properly accounted for when calibrating the dosimeter. The vendor supplies a calibration factor using 80‐kV diagnostic x‐rays under a free‐air condition. However, whether it is possible to use this calibration factor to evaluate the air kerma during the evaluation of the eye lens dose is unclear. In this paper, we aim to precisely determine calibration factors, and also examine the possible application of using a vendor‐supplied calibration factor. First, the x‐ray spectrum at the eye lens position during fluoroscopy was measured with a CdTe x‐ray spectrometer. We mimicked transfemoral cardiac catheterization using a human‐type phantom. Second, we evaluated the doses and calibration factors at three dosimetric points: front and back of protective goggles, and the front of the head (eye lens position). We used the measured x‐ray spectrum to determine the incident photon distribution in the eye lens regions, and x‐ray spectra corresponding to the dosimetric points around the eye lens were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation. Although the calibration factors varied with dosimetric positions, we found that the factors obtained were similar to the vendor‐supplied calibration factor. Furthermore, based on the experiment, we propose a practical way to calibrate an OSL dosimeter in an actual clinical situation. A person evaluating doses can use a vendor‐supplied calibration factor without any corrections for energy dependences, only when they add a systematic uncertainty of 5%. This evidence will strongly support actual exposure dose measurement during a clinical study

    Dichotomy Between Orbital and Magnetic Nematic Instabilities in BaFe2S3

    Full text link
    Nematic orders emerge nearly universally in iron-based superconductors, but elucidating their origins is challenging because of intimate couplings between orbital and magnetic fluctuations. The iron-based ladder material BaFe2S3, which superconducts under pressure, exhibits antiferromagnetic order below TN ~ 117K and a weak resistivity anomaly at T* ~ 180K, whose nature remains elusive. Here we report angle-resolved magnetoresistance (MR) and elastoresistance (ER) measurements in BaFe2S3, which reveal distinct changes at T*. We find that MR anisotropy and ER nematic response are both suppressed near T*, implying that an orbital order promoting isotropic electronic states is stabilized at T*. Such an isotropic state below T* competes with the antiferromagnetic order, which is evidenced by the nonmonotonic temperature dependence of nematic fluctuations. In contrast to the cooperative nematic orders in spin and orbital channels in iron pnictides, the present competing orders can provide a new platform to identify the separate roles of orbital and magnetic fluctuations.Comment: 7 pages 5 figures, to be published in Phys. Rev. Re

    Comparison of Exercise Echocardiography in Patients with 18mm ATS-AP Aortic Prosthesis

    Get PDF
    There have been various arguments concerning the patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for small valves. The objective of this study was to evaluate the postoperative hemodynamics in patients. Methods: The subjects were 6 patients [6 females aged 64 (17~74) years, with a median body surface area (BSA) of 1.37 (1.29~1.51) m2] who underwent AVR at our facility using the 18-mm ATS-AP and tolerated exercise loading. We estimated pressure gradient(PG) ,ejection fraction(EF), left ventricular mass Index(LVMI)at pre-operation and post-operation. Exercise echocardiography on an ergometer was performed before and 29.0 ± 14.4 months after surgery. We estimated PG and effective orifice area(EOAI) at rest and at exercise. We compared echo data between pre-operation and post-operation, between at rest and at exercise. Results: The effective orifice area index(EOAI) at rest was 0.92(0.75~1.06) cm2/m2. There was a significant change in the LVMI between pre-operation and post-operation[158.5(104.0~222.2) g/m2 versus 102.4(92.3~146.4) g/m2; P 0.05] and mean PG[11.0(6.6~16) mmHg versus 14.0(6.3~16) mmHg; P > 0.05], on maximal exercise. Conclusion: In patients whose BSA were 1.37(1.29~1.51) m2,the 18-mm ATS-AP was suggested to be a prosthetic valve that improves myocardial remodeling and provides stable hemodynamics even during exercise

    Estimation of identification limit for a small-type OSL dosimeter on the medical images by measurement of X-ray spectra

    Get PDF
    Our aim in this study is to derive an identification limit on a dosimeter for not disturbing a medical image when patients wear a small-type optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter on their bodies during X-ray diagnostic imaging. For evaluation of the detection limit based on an analysis of X-ray spectra, we propose a new quantitative identification method. We performed experiments for which we used diagnostic X-ray equipment, a soft-tissue-equivalent phantom (1–20 cm), and a CdTe X-ray spectrometer assuming one pixel of the X-ray imaging detector. Then, with the following two experimental settings, corresponding X-ray spectra were measured with 40–120 kVp and 0.5–1000 mAs at a source-to-detector distance of 100 cm: (1) X-rays penetrating a soft-tissue-equivalent phantom with the OSL dosimeter attached directly on the phantom, and (2) X-rays penetrating only the soft-tissue-equivalent phantom. Next, the energy fluence and errors in the fluence were calculated from the spectra. When the energy fluence with errors concerning these two experimental conditions was estimated to be indistinctive, we defined the condition as the OSL dosimeter not being identified on the X-ray image. Based on our analysis, we determined the identification limit of the dosimeter. We then compared our results with those for the general irradiation conditions used in clinics. We found that the OSL dosimeter could not be identified under the irradiation conditions of abdominal and chest radiography, namely, one can apply the OSL dosimeter to measurement of the exposure dose in the irradiation field of X-rays without disturbing medical images
    corecore