8 research outputs found
Determination of rivaroxaban by different factor Xa specific chromogenic substrate assays: reduction of interassay variability
Rivaroxaban and other oral direct factor Xa inhibitors (ODiXa) are currently developed for prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic diseases using fixed doses. Although routine monitoring is not required, assessing the intensity of anticoagulation may be useful under certain clinical conditions. ODiXa prolong coagulation times of several clotting assays and, thus, their concentration may be determined in factor Xa specific chromogenic substrate assays. So far, no standardized and validated assay is commercially available. Here, five methods (A through E) are studied and optimized to reduce interassay variability. Human pooled plasma was spiked by a serial dilution of rivaroxaban (25–900 ng/ml). The release of para-nitroaniline from the chromogenic substrates was measured by the optical density (OD) at 405 nm. Method B was identified to yield the lowest sum of deviations from the mean value of the OD concentration curve calculated from all assays. Spline functions were developed for OD versus concentration curves for all methods. The calculated OD versus concentration curves overlapped for all methods. The coefficient of variation for all assays and concentrations of rivaroxaban decreased from 25.3 ± 11.4% using the original data to 3.8 ± 2.2% using the calculated data (P < 0.0001). The robustness of the chromogenic assay (method B) remains to be corroborated in interlaboratory comparisons
The DOAC (direct oral anticoagulant) Dipstick reliably excludes residual FXa inhibitors levels in the preoperative setting
Highlights- Preoperative point-of-care test to determine DOAC levels in plasma- Comparison of the performance of a point-of-care test, UHPLC-MS/MS and a chromogenic assay- A negative DOAC Dipstick excludes residual levels of FXa inhibitors in plasma.- Reference standard test significantly impacts the performance of the index test. - Chromogenic anti-FXa assays should be validated against UHPLC-MS/MS