Environmental drivers of spring primary production in Hudson Bay

Pertinent environmental factors influencing the microalgal bloom during sea-ice breakup in Hudson Bay were investigated in June 2018, producing the first observations of late spring primary production in the offshore waters of this vast inland sea. Phytoplankton production was found to commence at the onset of ice melt, with surface nutrient depletion leading to the formation of a subsurface chlorophyll maximum in the open waters of western Hudson Bay. Concurrently, the melting mobile ice cover in central Hudson Bay created favorable conditions for a diatom-dominated under-ice bloom, with photosynthetic characteristics and relatively high production confirming that phytoplankton cells were able to acclimate to increasing light levels. Lower mean values of phytoplankton production and total chlorophyll a (TChl a) concentration observed under the sea ice (414 mg C m–2 d–1 and 33.7 mg TChl a m–2) than those observed in open waters during the late bloom stage in the western region (460 mg C m–2 d–1 and 53.5 mgTChl a m–2) were attributed to reduced under-ice light levels and low surface concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (<2 mmol L–1) in central Hudson Bay. However, the highly abundant subice diatom, Melosira arctica, was estimated to contribute an additional 378 mg C m–2 d–1 to under-ice production in this region. Therefore, this subice algal bloom appears to play a similar role in the seasonally ice-covered sub-Arctic as in the central Arctic Ocean where it contributes significantly to local production. By updating historical total production estimates of Hudson Bay ranging between 21.5 and 39 g C m–2 yr–1 with our late spring observations including the novel observation of M. arctica, annual production was recalculated to be 72 g C m–2 yr–1, which equates to mean values for interior Arctic shelves

Sediment-laden sea ice in southern Hudson Bay: Entrainment, transport, and biogeochemical implications

During a research expedition in Hudson Bay in June 2018, vast areas of thick (>10 m), deformed sediment-laden sea ice were encountered unexpectedly in southern Hudson Bay and presented difficult navigation conditions for the Canadian Coast Guard Ship Amundsen. An aerial survey of one of these floes revealed a maximum ridge height of 4.6 m and an average freeboard of 2.2 m, which corresponds to an estimated total thickness of 18 m, far greater than expected within a seasonal ice cover. Samples of the upper portion of the ice floe revealed that it was isothermal and fresh in areas with sediment present on the surface. Fine-grained sediment and larger rocks were visible on the ice surface, while a pronounced sediment band was observed in an ice core. Initial speculation was that this ice had formed in the highly dynamic Nelson River estuary from freshwater, but δ^{18}O isotopic analysis revealed a marine origin. In southern Hudson Bay, significant tidal forcing promotes both sediment resuspension and new ice formation within a flaw lead, which we speculate promotes the formation of this sediment-laden sea ice. Historic satellite imagery shows that sediment-laden sea ice is typical of southern Hudson Bay, varying in areal extent from 47 to 118 km2 during June. Based on an average sediment particle concentration of 0.1 mg mL^{–1} in sea ice, an areal extent of 51,924 km2 in June 2018, and an estimated regional end-of-winter ice thickness of 1.5 m, we conservatively estimated that a total sediment load of 7.8 × 106 t, or 150 t km^{–2}, was entrained within sea ice in southern Hudson Bay during winter 2018. As sediments can alter carbon concentrations and light transmission within sea ice, these first observations of this ice type in Hudson Bay imply biogeochemical impacts for the marine system

Spring primary production in relation to environmental drivers in central Hudson Bay

The environmental factors influencing the microalgal bloom during sea-ice breakup in Hudson Bay were investigated during June 2018, producing the first results ever on the seasonal development of the marine ecosystem in the offshore waters of this vast inland sea. As is typical in the Arctic, primary production was found to commence at the onset of ice melt, with surface nutrient depletion leading to the formation of a subsurface chlorophyll maximum in the open waters of western Hudson Bay. Simultaneously, the melting mobile ice cover in central Hudson Bay created favorable conditions for a diatom-dominated under-ice bloom, with the results of irradiance-photosynthesis curves confirming that phytoplankton cells were acclimated to increasing light levels in the surface water. The high production rates measured in ice-covered and ice-free waters highlight the considerable plasticity of phytoplankton in terms of photosynthetic performance in this highly variable environment. Interestingly, the maximum values of primary production and phytoplankton biomass observed under the sea ice (343 mg C m-2 d-1 and 35.10 mg TChl a m-2) were lower than those observed in open waters during the late-bloom stage in the western region (486 mg C m-2 d-1 and 57.12 mg TChl a m-2), which is attributed to a confined euphotic zone (reduced light availability? Since the euphotic zone in clear waters under the ice can be as thick as elsewhere, but simply receive less irradiance overall) under the ice and low surface concentrations of inorganic nitrogen (<2 mmol L-1) in central Hudson Bay. However, the highly abundant sub-ice diatom Melosira arctica contributed an estimated additional 287 mg C m-2 d-1 to under-ice production in this region, which implies that this filamentous diatom has a similar role in the seasonally ice-covered sub-Arctic as in the central Arctic Ocean where it significantly contributes to local production. Refining the historical total production estimates of Hudson Bay with our spring observations, we recalculated annual production to be ca. 69 g C m-2, which equates to mean value for interior Arctic shelves