4 research outputs found

    BNP-guided vs symptom-guided heart failure therapy : the trial of intensified vs standard medical therapy in elderly patients with congestive heart failure (TIME-CHF) randomized trial

    No full text
    CONTEXT: It is uncertain whether intensified heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is superior to symptom-guided therapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare 18-month outcomes of N-terminal BNP-guided vs symptom-guided heart failure therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled multicenter Trial of Intensified vs Standard Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF) of 499 patients aged 60 years or older with systolic heart failure (ejection fraction > or = 45%), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class of II or greater, prior hospitalization for heart failure within 1 year, and N-terminal BNP level of 2 or more times the upper limit of normal. The study had an 18-month follow-up and it was conducted at 15 outpatient centers in Switzerland and Germany between January 2003 and June 2008. INTERVENTION: Uptitration of guideline-based treatments to reduce symptoms to NYHA class of II or less (symptom-guided therapy) and BNP level of 2 times or less the upper limit of normal and symptoms to NYHA class of II or less (BNP-guided therapy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were 18-month survival free of all-cause hospitalizations and quality of life as assessed by structured validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal BNP and symptom-guided therapy resulted in similar rates of survival free of all-cause hospitalizations (41% vs 40%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.72-1.14]; P = .39). Patients' quality-of-life metrics improved over 18 months of follow-up but these improvements were similar in both the N-terminal BNP-guided and symptom-guided strategies. Compared with the symptom-guided group, survival free of hospitalization for heart failure, a secondary end point, was higher among those in the N-terminal BNP-guided group (72% vs 62%, respectively; HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50-0.92]; P = .01). Heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal BNP impro outcomes in patients aged 60 to 75 years but not in those aged 75 years or older (P > .02 for interaction) CONCLUSION: Heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal BNP did not improve overall clinical outcomes or quality of life compared with symptom-guided treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN43596477

    Progression to overt or silent CAD in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus at high coronary risk : main findings of the prospective multicenter BARDOT trial with a pilot randomized treatment substudy

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate prevalence, progression, treatment, and outcome of silent coronary artery disease (CAD) in asymptomatic patients with diabetes (DM) at high coronary risk. BACKGROUND: Despite the close association of diabetes and CAD, general CAD screening in asymptomatic patients with DM is discouraged even though outcome data in patients at high coronary risk are lacking. METHODS: Prospective multicenter outcome study-with a pilot randomized treatment substudy. The study comprised 400 asymptomatic patients with DM (type 2) without history or symptoms of CAD at high CAD risk. They underwent clinical evaluation and myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) at baseline and after 2 years. Patients with normal MPS received usual care; those with abnormal MPS received medical or combined invasive and medical management. RESULTS: An abnormal MPS was found in 87 of 400 patients (22%). In patients with normal MPS, MACE occurred in 2.9% and ischemia or new scar in 3.2%. Patients with abnormal MPS had more MACE (9.8%; hazard ratio: 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32 to 8.95; p = 0.011) and ischemia or new scar (34.2%; odds ratio: 15.91; 95% CI: 7.24 to 38.03; p textless 0.001) despite therapy, resulting in `overt or silent CAD progression` of 35.6% versus 4.6% (odds ratio: 11.53; 95% CI: 5.63 to 24.70; p textless 0.001). Patients with abnormal MPS randomized to medical versus invasive-medical strategies had similar event rates (p = 0.215), but more ischemic or new scar findings (54.3% vs. 15.8%; p textless 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk asymptomatic patients with DM and normal MPS (78%) have a low rate of first manifestations of CAD. Patients with abnormal MPS at baseline (22%) have a 7-fold higher rate of progression to `overt or silent CAD,` despite therapy. Randomized patients` outcomes suggest that a combined invasive and medical strategy for silent CAD may reduce scintigraphic but not symptoma CAD progression versus medical therapy alone. (Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy of Early coronary artery disease in Diabetes Mellitus ISRCTN87953632)
    corecore