Glycoprotein Nonmetastatic Melanoma Protein B as Potential Imaging Marker in Posttherapeutic Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate expression of potential molecular imaging targets epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), glycoprotein nonmetastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in lymph nodes (LNs) with or without head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) metastases after (chemo)radiation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study comparing receptor expression in paired lymph nodes after initial treatment. SETTING: A tertiary referral hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Salvage neck dissection specimens of 40 patients treated with (chemo)radiation were selected. LNs that contained viable tumor, reactive changes after initial treatment, and normal LNs were analyzed using immunohistochemically determined H-scores and by calculating sensitivity and specificity rates and positive/negative predictive values (PPVs/NPVs). RESULTS: EGFR expression was found in 86% and GPNMB expression in 100% of the LNs with viable tumor. VEGF expression was present in all lymph node types. For EGFR, the sensitivity rate was 86%, and specificity rate was 81%. For GPNMB, these were 100% and 75%, respectively. PPV of EGFR was 61.8% and NPV was 98.2%. These were 56.4% and 100% for GPNMB, respectively. CONCLUSION: In residual or recurrent HNSCC lymph node metastases, both EGFR and GPNMB show tumor-specific expression in immunohistochemistry, which may prove useful in future molecular imaging in salvage neck dissections. Immunohistochemically detected VEGF expression indicates that this target is not feasible for imaging purposes in salvage surgery. Therefore, GPNMB could be a new potential imaging target showing comparable results to EGFR in immunohistochemistry

Comparison of Carboplatin With 5-Fluorouracil vs. Cisplatin as Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) including three cycles of cisplatin is considered the standard of care for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). However, around one-third of the patients cannot complete cisplatin because of toxicity. Carboplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (carbo-5FU) is another accepted treatment option with a different toxicity profile. We compared tolerability and efficacy of concomitant carbo-5FU and cisplatin. Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of LA-HNSCC patients treated with CRT in two Dutch cancer centers between 2007 and 2016. All patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy. One center routinely administered carboplatin 300–350 mg/m2 at day 1, 22, and 43 followed by 5FU 600 mg/m2/day for 96 h. The other center used cisplatin 100 mg/m2 at day 1, 22, and 43. The primary endpoint of this study was chemotherapy completion rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional control (LRC) and distant metastasis–free interval (DMFS), toxicity, and unplanned admissions. Results: In the carbo-5FU cohort (n = 211), 60.2% of the patients completed chemotherapy vs. 76.7% (p < 0.001) of the patients in the cisplatin cohort (n = 223). Univariate analysis showed a higher risk of death in the carbo-5FU cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 1.53, 95% CI, 1.09–2.14, p = 0.01] with a 3-year OS of 65.4 vs. 76.5% for cisplatin. OS was independently associated with T and N stage and p16 status, but not with chemotherapy regimen (HR 1.08, 95% CI, 0.76–1.55, p = 0.65). Three-year DFS was 70.0% for carbo-5FU vs. 78.6% for cisplatin (HR 1.37, 95% CI, 0.93–2.01, p = 0.05). A similar outcome was observed for both LRC (HR 1.27, 95% CI, 0.74–2.09, p = 0.4) and DMFS (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.62–1.90, p = 0.77). The risk of discontinuation for chemotherapy-associated toxicity was higher in the carbo-5FU cohort than in the cisplatin cohort (relative risk = 1.69). Conclusion: LA-HNSCC patients treated with concomitant carbo-5FU completed chemotherapy less frequently than patients treated with cisplatin. Treatment regimen was not an independent prognostic factor for OS

Data-Driven prioritisation of antibody-drug conjugate targets in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Background: For patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) palliative treatment options that improve overall survival are limited. The prognosis in this group remains poor and there is an unmet need for new therapeutic options. An emerging class of therapeutics, targeting tumor-specific antigens, are antibodies bound to a cytotoxic agent, known as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). The aim of this study was to prioritize ADC targets in HNSCC. Methods: With a systematic search, we identified 55 different ADC targets currently targeted by registered ADCs and ADCs under clinical evaluation. For these 55 ADC targets, protein overexpression was predicted in a dataset containing 344 HNSCC mRNA expression profiles by using a method called functional genomic mRNA profiling. The ADC target with the highest predicted overexpression was validated by performing immunohistochemistry (IHC) on an independent tissue microarray containing 414 HNSCC tumors. Results: The predicted top 5 overexpressed ADC targets in HNSCC were: glycoprotein nmb (GPNMB), SLIT and NTRK-like family member 6, epidermal growth factor receptor, CD74 and CD44. IHC validation showed combined cytoplasmic and membranous GPNMB protein expression in 92.0% of the cases. Strong expression was seen in 65.9% of the cases. In addition, 86.5% and 67.7% of cases showed >= 5% and > 25% GPNMB positive tumor cells, respectively. Conclusions: This study provides a data-driven prioritization of ADCs targets that will facilitate clinicians and drug developers in deciding which ADC should be taken for further clinical evaluation in HNSCC. This might help to improve disease outcome of HNSCC patients