Thrombus in the Non-aneurysmal, Non-atherosclerotic Descending Thoracic Aorta – An Unusual Source of Arterial Embolism

AbstractIntroductionMural thrombus of the thoracic aorta is a rare clinical finding in the absence of aneurysm or atherosclerosis.MethodsThe medical records of all patients diagnosed with a thrombus of a non-aneurysmatic and non-atherosclerotic descending thoracic aorta (NAADTA) and treated by the senior author between 04/1997 and 04/2010 were reviewed.ResultsEight patients with mural thrombus of the NAADTA were identified. Arterial embolism was the main clinical finding in all cases and involved the lower extremities (n = 6), mesenteric (n = 3) or renal arteries (n = 2). Hypercoagulable disorders were present in 3 cases and a concurrent malignancy in another 3. Two patients underwent open surgery while 4 patients were treated conservatively with anticoagulation. Of the remaining 2 patients, one was treated with a thoracic stent-graft and aorto-biiliac bypass and the other one with transfemoral thrombectomy. Technical success was achieved in all surgical cases and thrombus resolution or stable disease in the conservative management group. No thrombus recurrence was observed during a mean follow-up of 49 months.ConclusionThe management of mural thrombus in NAADTA represents a challenge, especially in case of malignant disease or hypercoagulable disorder as a potential underlying pathology and should be individualized. Although no consensus exists in the literature, therapeutic anticoagulation is proposed as first-line therapy. The indication for surgical intervention results from contraindication to anticoagulation, mobile thrombus or recurrent embolism. Whenever possible, endovascular therapy should be preferred

Human Gastric Mucosa Expresses Glandular M3 Subtype of Muscarinic Receptors

Five subtypes of muscarinic receptors have been distinguished by pharmacological and molecular biological methods. This report characterizes the muscarinic subtype present in human gastric mucosa by radioligand binding studies. The receptor density was 27 ± 6 fmol/mg protein and the tritiated ligand N-methylscopolamine had an affinity of (Kn) 0.39 ± 0.08 nM (n = 11). The M1 receptor selective antagonist pirenzepine and the M2 receptor selective ligand AF-DX 116 had low affinities of 148 ± 32 nM (n = 13) and 4043 ± 1011 nM (n = 3) K n , respectively. The glandular M3 antagonists hexahydrosiladifenidol and silahexocyclium had high affinities ofKn 78 ± 23 nM (n = 5) and 5.6 ± 1.8 nM (n = 3). The agonist carbachol interacted with a single low-affinity site and binding was insensitive to modulation by guanine nucleotides. Antagonist and agonist binding studies thus showed an affinity profile typical of M3 receptors of the glandular type

[Endovascular therapy of an abdominal aortic aneurysm in a renal transplant recipient]

INTRODUCTION: The indications for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) are mainly established in hostile abdomen, in patients with significant comorbidities which affect the general operability of the patient and, given the necessary infrastructure, also in ruptured aneurysm. Along to those, we present another possible indication in the presence of a kidney allograft in patients with aortic aneurysm. METHODS: Based on a case report of aorto-biiliac stent-graft repair of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm in a patient with renal allograft, a systematic review of the literature was performed of all similar cases concerning surgical therapy in this constellation. RESULTS: EVAR was performed using an aorto-biiliac system (Zenith) Trifab, COOK) in a 61-year-old male patient 11 years after heterotopic renal allotransplantation in the right iliac fossa. Preoperative renal function was normal. Because the donor renal artery was anastomosed to the recipient's external iliac artery the stent-graft was implanted from the left common femoral artery to minimize temporary allograft ischemia. The intra- and postoperative course was uneventful with a follow-up of presently 12 months. A primary type-II endoleak (retroleak from a lumbar artery) is being treated conservatively so far with embolization being a future option. At present there are 15 cases of EVAR in renal allograft patients that have been reported, all of them being successful. DISCUSSION: All data existing in the literature reported to date as well as our own experience justify the first choice of EVAR in morphologically suitable cases. One major advantage of EVAR in this constellation is the avoidance of aortic cross clamping which poses the graft at risk of ischemia. Long-term results will be most important for definite assessment of EVAR. However, contrast media application during the operation and for CT surveillance should be considered as a major disadvantage