Differences in drug treatment of chronic heart failure between European countries

Aims A large number of drugs are currently used for the treatment of chronic heart failure. Treatment for other cardiovascular disorders has been shown to differ between countries. In this study we examined whether this would also be true in heart failure. Methods and Results We studied patients with moderate to severe heart failure, who were enrolled in an international survival study, and compared patterns of drug use between the nine countries that each included >50 patients in the study. The results were analysed to determine whether observed differences between countries could be explained by differences in the patients recruited. 1825 patients were studied (range 81-427 per country). By trial protocol, most patients were treated with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (92%) and all with diuretics, but the proportion of patients taking high doses of these drugs was markedly different between countries. Large differences were also observed in the use of digoxin (overall 64%, 39% in the U.K. to 87% in Germany) and antiarrhythmics (overall 25%,with the highest use 44% in France). The use of beta-blockers and calcium antagonists was low (overall 6% and 8%, respectively), but also different between countries. Anticoagulants (overall 43%) were used in many patients in the Netherlands and Switzerland (around 70%), while antiplatelets (overall use 30%) were most often prescribed in Denmark (51%). Conclusions Large differences in drug use and dosing for patients with advanced heart failure are observed between (European) countries. None of these differences could be explained by differences in patient characteristics, and whether they are related to factors such as tradition, economic circumstances and national guidelines, etc. is unknown

Achieving appropriate endpoints in heart failure trials:the PRIME-II protocol

Many clinical trials unintentionally include patients with a low risk of the trial endpoints. PRIME II (The Second Perspective Randomised study of Ibopamine on Mortality and Efficacy) was a large international randomised double blind trial comparing the addition of ibopamine or placebo to the therapy of patients with advanced heart failure. The trial was stopped prematurely because ibopamine was associated with an increased fatality rate, but the protocol achieved its objective of including high-risk patients. Here we describe the protocol details that enabled patients with the desired degree of risk to be included. We also amplify our definition of mode of death. The PRIME II protocol was designed with the intention that patients in the placebo group would have an annual fatality rate of 20%. Since the study was to be conducted in some 200 centres in 13 European countries, the inclusion criteria had to be simple and flexible, allowing for different clinical practice. The inclusion criteria, together with the use of simple investigations (which did not have to include angiographic or radionuclide ventriculography) are described. The annual fatality rate in the placebo group was just over 20%. Six categories of mode of death were used, but while they were reasonably easy to apply they did not reveal the reason for the unexpected adverse effect of ibopamine. The inclusion and exclusion criteria used for PRIME II, and the definitions of mode of death, were effective. The PRIME II protocol can be used as a model for future heart failure studies. (C) 1999 European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved

Influence of age on neurohormonal activation and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure

Aims Heart failure is a major medical problem in the elderly. Neurohormonal activation plays a role in the pathophysiology of heart failure, but is also affected by ageing. The present study was carried out to examine the influence of age on neurohormonal activation and prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure. Methods and Results We studied 372 patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class III-IV), who were treated with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (95%), diuretics (99%), and digoxin (59%). Their mean age was 68 +/- 8 years (range 38-80), left ventricular ejection fraction 0.23 +/- 0.08, and 77% were males. The relationship between age and plasma neurohormones (norepineprine, epinephrine, dopamine, renin. aldosterone, atrial natriuretic peptide, N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide, and endothelin), and age and prognosis was examined. Only atrial natriuretic peptide and N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide showed an independent, positive correlation with age (P74 years), age alone was an independent predictor for mortality