Screening for obstructive sleep apnea on the internet: randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is underdiagnosed. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention to promote obstructive sleep apnea screening among members of an Internet weight-loss community. METHODS: Members of an Internet weight-loss community who have never been diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea or discussed the condition with their healthcare provider were randomized to intervention (online risk assessment+feedback) or control. The primary outcome was discussing obstructive sleep apnea with a healthcare provider at 12 weeks. RESULTS: Of 4700 members who were sent e-mail study announcements, 168 (97% were female, age 39.5 years [standard deviation 11.7], body mass index 30.3 [standard deviation 7.8]) were randomized to intervention (n=84) or control (n=84). Of 82 intervention subjects who completed the risk assessment, 50 (61%) were low risk and 32 (39%) were high risk for obstructive sleep apnea. Intervention subjects were more likely than control subjects to discuss obstructive sleep apnea with their healthcare provider within 12 weeks (11% [9/84] vs 2% [2/84]; P=.02; relative risk=4.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.002-20.21). The number needed to treat was 12. High-risk intervention subjects were more likely than control subjects to discuss obstructive sleep apnea with their healthcare provider (19% [6/32] vs 2% [2/84]; P=.004; relative risk=7.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-37.02). One high-risk intervention subject started treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. CONCLUSION: An online screening intervention is feasible and likely effective in encouraging members of an Internet weight-loss community to discuss obstructive sleep apnea with their healthcare provider

Cystatin C Predicts Renal Recovery Earlier Than Creatinine Among Patients With Acute Kidney Injury

Serum cystatin C increases earlier than creatinine during acute kidney injury. However, whether cystatin C decreases earlier during recovery is unknown. This retrospective study aimed to determine the temporal trend between creatinine and cystatin C in acute kidney injury. Methods: We identified hospitalized patients with nonoliguric acute kidney injury who had serial creatinine and cystatin C values measured between May 2015 and May 2016. Demographic and laboratory data, causes of acute kidney injury, and relevant comorbidity data were collected through chart review. Results: For the 63 identified patients, mean (SD) age was 58.7 (13.9) years; male sex, 62%; white race/ethnicity, 95%. Baseline median (range) creatinine was 1.1 (0.5–3.0) mg/dl; 13% were kidney transplant recipients and 37% received corticosteroids. Comorbidities included malignancy (38%), diabetes mellitus (33%), heart failure (19%), and thyroid disorder (16%). The cause of kidney injury was acute tubular necrosis in 71%, 61% had acute kidney injury stage III, and 33% required dialysis. Cystatin C began to decrease before creatinine in 68% of patients: 1 day earlier, 46%; 2 days earlier, 16%; and 3 days earlier, 6%. In 24% of cases, both began decreasing on the same day; in only 8%, cystatin C decreased after creatinine. Overall, cystatin C mean (95% confidence interval) decrease was 0.92 (0.65–1.18) days before creatinine (P < 0.001). Conclusion: In summary, cystatin C decreases before creatinine in most hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury. If confirmed in large prospective studies, these findings may have important management implications, possibly shortening hospital stay and reducing costs