Decision-support for arsenic- and salt- mitigation in Bangladesh: the ASTRA approach

Bangladesh faces a growing water crisis. Limitations to safe water access arise from the widespread pathogenic contamination of its surface waters, the severe arsenic contamination of its aquifers and the growing salinity in the country’s coastal regions. Appropriate water supply methods are identified for some of these contexts, it is challenging to select resilient water supply solutions for the low-income, rural areas of Bangladesh. The ASTRA tool is developed to support the identification of potentially appropriate drinking water methods and to aid their implementation in this context. It can be seen as the combination of a multidisciplinary sourcebook and a decision-support instrument. This paper outlines the main mitigation routes as the (i) targeting of contamination-free groundwater, (ii) treatment of arsenic- and salt-contaminated aquifers and (iii) utilization of non-groundwater sources. The paper also describes the tool-inventory and the context factors applied to determine functional ranges of the included water supply methods

As(III) removal in rapid filters: Effect of pH, Fe(II)/Fe(III), filtration velocity and media size

In the top layer of aerated rapid sand filtration systems, uncharged As(III) is biologically converted to charged As(V). Subsequently, the main removal mechanism for As(V) is adsorption onto oxidised, flocculated Fe(III) (hydrous ferric hydroxides; HFO). The aim of this research was to understand the interactions between As and Fe in biologically active rapid filter columns and investigate the effect of different operational modes on Fe removal to subsequently promote As removal. For this purpose, different filter media column experiments were performed using natural, aerated groundwater containing 3.4 μg/l As(III). Results show that independent of the filter media size, complete (biological) conversion of As(III), manganese, ammonium and nitrite was achieved in approximately 70 days. After ripening, enhanced As removal was achieved with a top layer of coarse media or by dosing additional Fe(III). Addition of Fe(II) did not have the same effect on As removal, potentially due to heterogeneous Fe(II) oxidation in the upper layer of the filter, attaching rapidly to the filter grain surface and thereby preventing HFO flocs to penetrate deeper into the bed. Increasing the flow rate from 1 to 4 m/h did not improve As removal and lowering the pH from 8 to 7.4, resulted in an 55% increased removal of dissolved As. Altogether it is concluded that As removal in biologically active rapid sand filters can be improved by applying coarser filter media on top, in combination with dosing Fe(III) and/or pH correction.Sanitary Engineerin

As(III) oxidation by MnO₂ during groundwater treatment

The top layer of natural rapid sand filtration was found to effectively oxidise arsenite (As(III)) in groundwater treatment. However, the oxidation pathway has not yet been identified. The aim of this study was to investigate whether naturally formed manganese oxide (MnO2), present on filter grains, could abiotically be responsible for As(III) oxidation in the top of a rapid sand filter. For this purpose As(III) oxidation with two MnO2 containing powders was investigated in aerobic water containing manganese(II) (Mn(II)), iron(II) (Fe(II)) and/or iron(III) (Fe(III)). The first MnO2 powder was a very pure - commercially available - natural MnO2 powder. The second originated from a filter sand coating, produced over 22 years in a rapid filter during aeration and filtration. Jar test experiments showed that both powders oxidised As(III). However, when applying the MnO2 in aerated, raw groundwater, As(III) removal was not enhanced compared to aeration alone. It was found that the presence of Fe(II)) and Mn(II) inhibited As(III) oxidation, as Fe(II) and Mn(II) adsorption and oxidation were preferred over As(III) on the MnO2 surface (at pH 7). Therefore it is concluded that just because MnO2 is present in a filter bed, it does not necessarily mean that MnO2 will be available to oxidise As(III). However, unlike Fe(II), the addition of Fe(III) did not hinder As(III) oxidation on the MnO2 surface; resulting in subsequent effective As(V) removal by the flocculating hydrous ferric oxides.Sanitary EngineeringWater Managemen

Biological As(III) oxidation in rapid sand filters

The objective of this study was to investigate whether arsenic-oxidising bacteria (AsOB) will grow and survive in rapid sand filters. Additionally, the interdependence of other groundwater constituents (Fe(II), Mn(II), NH4) with biological As(III) oxidation was investigated. For this purpose As(III) oxidation was monitored in pilot-scale filter sand columns fed with raw groundwater, as well as treated groundwater (drinking water) with spikes of either As(III), Mn(II) or NH4. It was concluded that biological As(III) oxidation rapidly developed in the rapid sand filter columns. With a typical lag and log phase, decreasing As(III) and increasing As(V) concentrations in the effluent of the sand columns were observed in a timeframe of weeks. The growth of biomass in the sand columns was confirmed with ATP analysis. ATP concentrations on the sand grains increased from 0.7 ng/g to 16, 8 and 2 ng/g filter sand stratified from the top of the sand filter to the bottom, respectively. Additionally, a microbial community analysis (16S rRNA) showed a high relative abundance of α- and β-Proteobacteria; the same classes where most AsOB are phylogenetically placed. This study establishes that AsOB are able to grow and maintain their population on low As(III) concentrations, either in presence, or absence, of other common groundwater bacteria and mineral precipitates, directly leading to an increased As removal in the filter bed.Sanitary Engineerin

Particulate matter characterization of Cauca River water in Colombia

The particulate matter composition in the Upper Cauca River section was studied, considering the importance of this river for the water supply of Cali, Colombia, and the implications that the turbidity of this water source has had for the city's water treatment. Additionally, the upstream Palo River was investigated, as this river is a major contributor to the Cauca River. River water samples were taken in both rivers in the period 2012–2014 during dry and rainy seasons. The origin of the particulate matter was studied through measurements of turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS), volatile suspended solids, particle size distribution, Fe3+, PO43−, NO3-N, chlorophyll-a, chemical oxygen demand, and true color. Turbidity and TSS values, measured during this survey, were highly variable, ranging from 25 to 465 NTU and 10 to 490 mg/L in the Cauca River, and from 30 to 840 NTU and 15 to 710 mg/L in the Palo River, respectively. High scattering was obtained in TSS and turbidity relationships in both rivers, potentially due to the different sources contributing to both parameters. It was concluded that the concentration of particulate matter depended merely on precipitation events in the Cauca and Palo River basins, leading to soil erosion due to extensive and intensive agricultural practices. In addition, the South Canal was identified as one of the main contributors to organic particulate matter.Sanitary EngineeringWater Managemen

Riverbank filtration for the treatment of highly turbid Colombian rivers

The poor quality of many Colombian surface waters forces us to seek alternative, sustainable treatment solutions with the ability to manage peak pollution events and to guarantee the uninterrupted provision of safe drinking water to the population. This review assesses the potential of using riverbank filtration (RBF) for the highly turbid and contaminated waters in Colombia, emphasizing water quality improvement and the influence of clogging by suspended solids. The suspended sediments may be favorable for the improvement of the water quality, but they may also reduce the production yield capacity. The cake layer must be balanced by scouring in order for an RBF system to be sustainable. The infiltration rate must remain high enough throughout the river-aquifer interface to provide the water quantity needed, and the residence time of the contaminants must be sufficient to ensure adequate water quality. In general, RBF seems to be a technology appropriate for use in highly turbid and contaminated surface rivers in Colombia, where improvements are expected due to the removal of turbidity, pathogens and to a lesser extent inorganics, organic matter and micro-pollutants. RBF has the potential to mitigate shock loads, thus leading to the prevention of shutdowns of surface water treatment plants. In addition, RBF, as an alternative pretreatment step, may provide an important reduction in chemical consumption, considerably simplifying the operation of the existing treatment processes. However, clogging and self-cleansing issues must be studied deeper in the context of these highly turbid waters to evaluate the potential loss of abstraction capacity yield as well as the development of different redox zones for efficient contaminant removal.Sanitary EngineeringWater Managemen

Integrating biological As(III) oxidation with Fe(0) electrocoagulation for arsenic removal from groundwater

Arsenic (As) is a toxic element present in many (ground)water sources in the world. Most conventional As removal techniques require pre-oxidation of the neutral arsenite (As(III)) species to the negatively charged arsenate (As(V)) oxyanion to optimize As removal and minimize chemical use. In this work, a novel, continuous-flow As removal system was developed that combines biological As(III) oxidation by bacteria with Fe electrocoagulation (EC), an Fe(0)-based electrochemical technology that generates reactive Fe(III) precipitates to bind As. The bio-integrated FeEC system (bio-FeEC) showed effective oxidation and removal of 150 µg/L As(III), without the need of chemicals. To remove As to below the WHO guideline of 10 µg/L, 10 times lower charge dosage was required for the bio-FeEC system compared to conventional FeEC. This lower Fe dosage requirement reduced sludge production and energy consumption. The As(III) oxidizing biomass was found to consist of bacteria belonging to Comamonadaceae, Rhodobacteraceae and Acidovorax, which are capable of oxidizing As(III) and are common in drinking water biofilms. Characterization of the As-laden Fe solids by X-ray absorption spectroscopy indicated that both bio-FeEC and conventional FeEC produced solids consistent with a mixture of lepidocrocite and 2-line ferrihydrite. Arsenic bound to the solids was dominantly As(V), but a slightly higher fraction of As(V) was detected in the bio-FeEC solids compared to the conventional FeEC.</p

Fluoride removal from water by Ca-Al-CO₃ layered double hydroxides and simultaneous acidification

Millions of people worldwide are exposed to excessive concentrations of fluoride (F−) from groundwater sources. Ca-Al-CO3 layered double hydroxides (LDHs) have shown promising defluoridation efficiency; however, defluoridation by Ca-Al-CO3 LDHs is highly pH sensitive. This study showed that simultaneous acidification by conventional acids, such as HCl and CO2 substantially increased the performance of Ca-Al-CO3 LDHs for F- removal at environmentally relevant concentrations (e.g., 10 mg/L) to below the WHO guideline value (1.5 mg/L), while, in comparison to other acids (HNO3, H2SO4, H3PO4), the use of HCl and CO2 does not lead to the introduction of potentially harmful or undesired anions. The addition of HCl and CO2 to LDHs suspensions did lead to changes to the LDHs structure. Leaching experiments, supported by PHREEQC modelling and characterization (SEM-EDX, XRD and FTIR), strongly suggest that the main mechanism of F- removal by Ca-Al-CO3 LDHs was F− adsorption or complexation onto/into various rehydrated mixed metal oxides which re-precipitated upon partial LDHs dissolution when acidifying.Sanitary Engineerin

Fluoride removal by Ca-Al-CO₃ layered double hydroxides at environmentally-relevant concentrations

In this study, F− removal by Ca–Al–CO3 layered double hydroxides (LDHs) was investigated at environmentally-relevant concentration ranges (2–12 mg/L) to below the WHO guideline, with an emphasis on the effect of LDHs’ modification, as well as the effects of initial F− concentration, adsorbent dose, pH, temperature and co-existing ions. Ca–Al–CO3 LDHs, either untreated, calcined or microwave treated, showed affinity for the removal of F− from synthetic groundwater with capacities of 6.7–8.4 mg F−/g LDHs at groundwater-relevant pH, with a higher F− removal capacity at lower pH (&lt;8) and lower temperature (12 °C, as compared to 25 °C &amp; 35 °C). Since calcination and microwave treatment resulted in only marginal defluorination improvements, using untreated LDHs appears the practically most feasible option. For the untreated LDHs, competition with Cl− and NO3− was not observed, whereas at higher HCO3− and SO42− concentrations (&gt;250 mg/L) a slight reduction in F− removal was observed. This study indicates the potential of Ca–Al–CO3 LDHs as a cost-effective F− removal technology, particularly when locally sourced and in combination with low-cost pH correction.Sanitary Engineerin

Sequential Fe²⁺ oxidation to mitigate the inhibiting effect of phosphate and silicate on arsenic removal

Sequential iron (as Fe2+) oxidation has been found to yield improved arsenic (as As(III)) uptake than the single-step oxidation. The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of interactions with phosphate (PO43−) and silicate (SiO42−) during sequential Fe2+ and As(III) oxidation and removal, as these are typically found in groundwater and known to interfere with As removal. The laboratory experiments were performed using single and multi-step jar tests with an initial As(III/V), Fe2+, PO43−, SiO42− concentrations, and pH of 200 μg/L, 2.5 mg/L, 2 mg/L, 16 mg/L and 7.0, respectively representing the targeted natural groundwater in Rajshahi district, Bangladesh. The sequential Fe2+ and As(III) oxidation in the multi-step jar tests indicated that the PO43− hindrance on As removal in the first Fe2+ oxidation step was compensated for in the second. Moreover, smaller Fe flocs (&lt;0.45 μm) were observed in the presence of SiO42−, potentially providing more surface area during the second Fe2+ oxidation step leading to better overall As removal. Altogether it may be concluded that controlling the As(III) and Fe2+ oxidation sequence is beneficial for As removal compared to single-step Fe2+ oxidation, both in the presence and absence of PO43− and/or SiO42−.Sanitary EngineeringWater Managemen