The association of daily physical activity and birth outcome: a population-based cohort study

The potential relationship between daily physical activity and pregnancy outcome remains unclear because of the wide variation in study designs and physical activity assessment measures. We sought to prospectively quantify the potential effects of the various domains of physical activity on selected birth outcomes in a large unselected population. The sample consisted of 11,759 singleton pregnancies from the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children, United Kingdom. Information on daily physical activity was collected by postal questionnaire for self-report measures. Main outcome measures were birth weight, gestational age at delivery, preterm birth and survival. After controlling for confounders, a sedentary lifestyle and paid work during the second trimester of pregnancy were found to be associated with a lower birth weight, while ‘bending and stooping’ and ‘working night shifts’ were associated with a higher birth weight. There was no association between physical exertion and duration of gestation or survival. Repetitive boring tasks during the first trimester was weakly associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (<37 weeks) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.25, 95% CI 1.04–1.50). ‘Bending and stooping’ during the third trimester was associated with a reduced risk of preterm birth (adjusted OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.84). Demanding physical activities do not have a harmful effect on the selected birth outcomes while a sedentary lifestyle is associated with a lower birth weight. In the absence of either medical or obstetric complications, pregnant women may safely continue their normal daily physical activities should they wish to do so

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study

Abstract BACKGROUND: In the past 30 years karyotyping was the gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aberrations in the fetus. Traditional karyotyping (TKT) has a high accuracy and reliability. However, it is labor intensive, the results take 14-21 days, the costs are high and unwanted findings such as abnormalities with unknown clinical relevance are not uncommon. These disadvantages challenged the practice of karyotyping. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a new molecular genetic technique in prenatal diagnosis. Previous preclinical evidence suggests equivalence of MLPA and traditional karyotyping (TKT) regarding test performance. METHODS/DESIGN: The proposed study is a multicentre diagnostic substitute study among pregnant women, who choose to have amniocentesis for the indication advanced maternal age and/or increased risk following prenatal screening test. In all subjects, both MLPA and karyotyping will be performed on the amniotic fluid sample. The primary outcome is diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes will be maternal quality of life, women's preferences and costs. Analysis will be intention to treat and per protocol analysis. Quality of life analysis will be carried out within the study population. The study aims to include 4500 women. DISCUSSION: The study results are expected to help decide whether MLPA can replace traditional karyotyping for 'low-risk' pregnancies in terms of diagnostic accuracy, quality of life and women's preferences. This will be the first clinical study to report on all relevant aspects of the potential replacement

Antepartum Assessment of Hemoglobin, Hematocrit, and Serum Ferritin

SCOPUS: ch.binfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

Ethnic differences in considerations whether or not to participate in prenatal screening for Down syndrome

Objective To evaluate ethnic differences in considerations whether or not to participate in prenatal screening for Down syndrome and to relate these to differences in participation. Method The study population consisted of 270 pregnant women from Dutch, Turkish and Surinamese (African and South Asian) ethnic origin, attending midwifery or obstetrical practices in the Netherlands. Women were interviewed after booking for prenatal care. Considerations were assessed by one open-ended question and 18 statements that were derived from focus group interviews. Actual participation was assessed several months later. Results Women from ethnic minorities were less likely to participate in prenatal screening, which could be attributed to differences in age and religious identity. They more often reported acceptance of 'what God gives', low risk of having a child with Down syndrome and costs of screening as considerations not to participate in prenatal screening. They also reported many considerations in favour of participation, which did not differ from those of Dutch women but were less often consistent with actual participation in screening. Conclusions Women from ethnic minorities should not be stereotyped as being uninterested in prenatal screening, but should be better informed about the consequences of prenatal screening and Down syndrome. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Lt

Survival after non-aggressive obstetric management in cases of severe fetal anomalies: a retrospective study

Obstetricians may choose to refrain from interventions aimed at sustaining fetal life (i.e., non-aggressive obstetric management) when the fetus has an extremely poor prognosis. However, if the infant is then born alive, crucial neonatal management decisions then have to be made. We sought empirical data concerning such perinatal end-of-life decisions. Firstly, to describe survival during delivery and after birth following non-aggressive obstetric management, and secondly, to describe neonatal management in infants born alive after non-aggressive obstetric management. Retrospective descriptive study. Tertiary centre. Eighty-one infants born to women who opted for a non-aggressive obstetric management policy because of sonographically diagnosed severe fetal anomaly. Data were collected from obstetric and neonatal records, as well as ultrasound reports. Survival, neonatal management and health status after birth. Relevant data were available for 78/80 (98%) infants. Six (8%) infants died in utero, 16 (21%) died during delivery (11 from cephalocentesis) and 56 (72%) were born alive. Life-sustaining neonatal treatment was initiated in 29 (52%) of the live-born infants. Twenty-three of these 29 (79%) infants died within six months of birth. Of the 27 live-born infants who did not receive neonatal life-sustaining treatment, 25 (93%) died. Eight infants survived; all with severe health problems. Life-sustaining neonatal support after non-aggressive obstetric management in the presence of severe fetal malformation has little impact on surviva

Practice variation of test procedures reportedly used in routine antenatal care in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are encouraged to book for antenatal care. However, little is known about the contents of antenatal care, in particular regarding various test procedures. The present descriptive study was conducted to assess the variation in standard test procedures in antenatal care in The Netherlands. METHODS: A nationwide structured survey by mailed questionnaire was carried out among specialist obstetricians and midwives in The Netherlands. Representatives of each obstetric practice registered with the Dutch Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (n=132) and a sample of midwives registered with the Dutch Society of Midwives (n=394) were invited to report the standard policy of tests routinely used for antenatal care in their own setting. Furthermore, they were asked to report their views on the potential impact of the antenatal care program on pregnancy outcome. RESULTS: Complete information was available from 105 specialist obstetricians (80%) and 281 midwives (71%). The assessment of maternal blood pressure and weight are reportedly the commonest procedures routinely conducted during the antenatal period. However, within each profession reported definitions and implications of abnormal findings vary markedly, especially in the fields of identification and management of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Serial examination of the cervix is not standard policy among both groups. With respect to laboratory tests, considerable intra- and interprofessional variations are reported, in particular those for maternal serum glucose, rubella antibody titer and urinary dipstick for glucose and protein. As to standard ultrasound policies, wide intra- and interprofessional variations are noted. Seventy-two specialist obstetricians (68%) and 92 midwives (33%) routinely estimate the duration of gestation by ultrasound in pregnant women (p<0.001). A fetal anomaly scan at about 18-20 weeks' gestation is routinely offered to pregnant women by 31 specialist obstetricians (30%) and 44 midwives (16%) (p<0.01); 29 obstetricians (28%) and 11 midwives (4%) reportedly use ultrasound in all pregnant women for the detection of fetal growth restriction (p<0.001). Overall, midwives have a more optimistic view about the impact of antenatal care on pregnancy outcome than obstetricians. CONCLUSIONS: Although the standard package of antenatal care provided by both specialist obstetricians and midwives in The Netherlands seems to be relatively uniform, wide intra- and interprofessional variations exist with respect to (1) the application of tests in terms of recommendations to test some or all pregnant women, (2) defining normal from abnormal and (3) potential implications of abnormal findings