Masses of Scalar and Axial-Vector B Mesons Revisited

The SU(3) quark model encounters a great challenge in describing even-parity mesons. Specifically, the $q\bar q$ quark model has difficulties in understanding the light scalar mesons below 1 GeV, scalar and axial-vector charmed mesons and $1^+$ charmonium-like state $X(3872)$. A common wisdom for the resolution of these difficulties lies on the coupled channel effects which will distort the quark model calculations. In this work, we focus on the near mass degeneracy of scalar charmed mesons, $D_{s0}^*$ and $D_0^{*0}$, and its implications. Within the framework of heavy meson chiral perturbation theory, we show that near degeneracy can be qualitatively understood as a consequence of self-energy effects due to strong coupled channels. Quantitatively, the closeness of $D_{s0}^*$ and $D_0^{*0}$ masses can be implemented by adjusting two relevant strong couplings and the renormalization scale appearing in the loop diagram. Then this in turn implies the mass similarity of $B_{s0}^*$ and $B_0^{*0}$ mesons. The $P_0^* P'_1$ interaction with the Goldstone boson is crucial for understanding the phenomenon of near degeneracy. Based on heavy quark symmetry in conjunction with corrections from QCD and $1/m_Q$ effects, we obtain the masses of $B^*_{(s)0}$ and $B'_{(s)1}$ mesons, for example, $M_{B_{s0}^*}= (5715\pm1)\,{\rm MeV}+\delta\Delta_S$, $M_{B'_{s1}}=(5763\pm1)\,{\rm MeV}+\delta\Delta_S$ with $\delta\Delta_S$ being $1/m_Q$ corrections. We find that the predicted mass difference of 48 MeV between $B'_{s1}$ and $B_{s0}^*$ is larger than that of $20\sim 30$ MeV inferred from the relativistic quark models, whereas the difference of 15 MeV between the central values of $M_{B'_{s1}}$ and $M_{B'_1}$ is much smaller than the quark model expectation of $60-100$ MeV.Comment: 21 pages, 1 figure, to appear in Eur. Phys. J. (2017). arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1404.377

Dithiolopyrrolone Natural Products : Isolation, Synthesis and Biosynthesis

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Resummation Prediction on Higgs and Vector Boson Associated Production with a Jet Veto at the LHC

We investigate the resummation effects for the SM Higgs and vector boson associated production at the LHC with a jet veto in soft-collinear effective theory using "collinear anomalous" formalism. We calculate the jet vetoed invariant mass distribution and the cross section for this process at Next-to-Next-to-Leading-Logarithmic level, which are matched to the QCD Next-to-Leading Order results, and compare the differences of the resummation effects with different jet veto $p_{T}^{\rm veto}$ and jet radius $R$. Our results show that both resummation enhancement effects and the scale uncertainties decrease with the increasing of jet veto $p_{T}^{\rm veto}$ and jet radius $R$, respectively. When $p_{T}^{\rm veto}=25$ GeV and $R=0.4~(0.5)$, the resummation effects reduce the scale uncertainties of the Next-to-Leading Order jet vetoed cross sections to about $7\%~(6\%)$, which lead to increased confidence on the theoretical predictions. Besides, after including resummation effects, the PDF uncertainties of jet vetoed cross section are about $7\%$.Comment: 22 pages, 10 figures and 2 tables; final version in JHE

Soft gluon resummation in the signal-background interference process of gg(→h∗)→ZZgg(\to h^*) \to ZZ

We present a precise theoretical prediction for the signal-background interference process of $gg(\to h^*) \to ZZ$, which is useful to constrain the Higgs boson decay width and to measure Higgs couplings to the SM particles. The approximate NNLO $K$-factor is in the range of $2.05-2.45$ ($1.85-2.25$), depending on $M_{ZZ}$, at the 8 (13) TeV LHC. And the soft gluon resummation can increase the approximate NNLO result by about $10\%$ at both the 8 TeV and 13 TeV LHC. The theoretical uncertainties including the scale, uncalculated multi-loop amplitudes of the background and PDF$+\alpha_s$ are roughly $\mathcal{O}(10\%)$ at ${\rm NNLL'}$. We also confirm that the approximate $K$-factors in the interference and the pure signal processes are the same.Comment: 18 pages, 9 figures; v2 published in JHE