Hearing Improvement after Partial Labyrinthectomy: Resection of petrous apex cholesterol granuloma

We present the case of a 57 year-old male presenting with symptomatic petrous apex cholesterol granuloma, multiple cranial nerve weaknesses and deafness of the left ear. The chosen intervention was a cholesterol granuloma resection via the translabyrinthine approach. This resulted in cranial nerve recovery and improved facial functionality. Hearing in the operated ear improved within 3 months after surgery. The patient experienced no postoperative complications. We conclude that a translabyrinthine approach can be used for drainage of petrous apex cholesterol granulomas with a chance of hearing loss recover

Machine Learning and Cochlear Implantation: Predicting the Post-Operative Electrode Impedances

Cochlear implantation is the common treatment for severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss if there is no benefit from hearing aids. Measuring the electrode impedance along the electrode array at different time points after surgery is crucial in verifying the electrodes’ status, determining the compliance levels, and helping to identify the electric dynamic range. Increased impedance values without proper reprogramming can affect the patient’s performance. The prediction of acceptable levels of electrode impedance at different time points after the surgery could help clinicians during the fitting sessions through a comparison of the predicted with the measured levels. Accordingly, clinicians can decide if the measured levels are within the predicted normal range or not. In this work, we used a dataset of 80 pediatric patients who had received cochlear implants with the MED-EL FLEX 28 electrode array. We predicted the impedance of the electrode arrays in each channel at different time points: at one month, three months, six months, and one year after the date of surgery. We used different machine learning algorithms such as linear regression, Bayesian linear regression, decision forest regression, boosted decision tree regression, and neural networks. The used features include the patient’s age and the intra-operative electrode impedance at different electrodes. Our results indicated that the best algorithm varies depending on the channel, while the Bayesian linear regression and neural networks provide the best results for 75% of the channels. Furthermore, the accuracy level ranges between 83% and 100% in half of the channels one year after the surgery, when an error range between 0 and 3 KΩ is defined as an acceptable threshold. Moreover, the use of the patient’s age alone can provide the best prediction results for 50% of the channels at six months or one year after surgery. This reflects that the patient’s age could be a predictor of the electrode impedance after the surgery

Two-phase survey on the frequency of use and safety of MRI for hearing implant recipients.

PURPOSE Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to visualize and diagnose soft tissues. Hearing implant (HI) recipients are likely to require at least one MRI scan during their lifetime. However, the MRI scanner can interact with the implant magnet, resulting in complications for the HI recipient. This survey, which was conducted in two phases, aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of MRI scans for individuals with a HI manufactured by MED-EL (MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). METHODS A survey was developed and distributed in two phases to HEARRING clinics to obtain information about the use of MRI for recipients of MED-EL devices. Phase 1 focused on how often MRI is used in diagnostic imaging of the head region of the cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Phase 2 collected safety information about MRI scans performed on HI recipients. RESULTS 106 of the 126 MRI scans reported in this survey were performed at a field strength of 1.5 T, on HI recipients who wore the SYNCHRONY CI or SYNCHRONY ABI. The head and spine were the most frequently imaged regions. 123 of the 126 scans were performed without any complications; two HI recipients experienced discomfort/pain. One recipient required reimplantation after an MRI was performed using a scanner that had not been approved for that implant. There was only one case that required surgical removal of the implant to reduce the imaging artefact. CONCLUSION Individuals with either a SYNCHRONY CI or SYNCHRONY ABI from MED-EL can safely undergo a 1.5 T MRI when it is performed according to the manufacturer's safety policies and procedures