2 research outputs found

    Ultradiversification of Diversities

    No full text
    In this paper, using the idea of ultrametrization of metric spaces we introduce ultradiversification of diversities. We show that every diversity has an ultradiversification which is the greatest nonexpansive ultra-diversity image of it. We also investigate a Hausdorff-Bayod type problem in the setting of diversities, namely, determining what diversities admit a subdominant ultradiversity. This gives a description of all diversities which can be mapped onto ultradiversities by an injective nonexpansive map. The given results generalize similar results in the setting of metric spaces

    The utility of SARS-CoV-2 genomic data for informative clustering under different epidemiological scenarios and sampling

    No full text
    Objectives: Clustering pathogen sequence data is a common practice in epidemiology to gain insights into the genetic diversity and evolutionary relationships among pathogens. We can find groups of cases with a shared transmission history and common origin, as well as identifying transmission hotspots. Motivated by the experience of clustering SARS-CoV-2 cases using whole genome sequence data during the COVID-19 pandemic to aid with public health investigation, we investigated how differences in epidemiology and sampling can influence the composition of clusters that are identified. Methods: We performed genomic clustering on simulated SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks produced with different transmission rates and levels of genomic diversity, along with varying the proportion of cases sampled. Results: In single outbreaks with a low transmission rate, decreasing the sampling fraction resulted in multiple, separate clusters being identified where intermediate cases in transmission chains are missed. Outbreaks simulated with a high transmission rate were more robust to changes in the sampling fraction and largely resulted in a single cluster that included all sampled outbreak cases. When considering multiple outbreaks in a sampled jurisdiction seeded by different introductions, low genomic diversity between introduced cases caused outbreaks to be merged into large clusters. If the transmission and sampling fraction, and diversity between introductions was low, a combination of the spurious break-up of outbreaks and the linking of closely related cases in different outbreaks resulted in clusters that may appear informative, but these did not reflect the true underlying population structure. Conversely, genomic clusters matched the true population structure when there was relatively high diversity between introductions and a high transmission rate. Conclusion: Differences in epidemiology and sampling can impact our ability to identify genomic clusters that describe the underlying population structure. These findings can help to guide recommendations for the use of pathogen clustering in public health investigations.Medicine, Faculty ofNon UBCPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department ofReviewedFacultyPostdoctoralGraduat
    corecore