Influence of prior beliefs on perception in early psychosis: Effects of illness stage and hierarchical level of belief.

Alterations in the balance between prior expectations and sensory evidence may account for faulty perceptions and inferences leading to psychosis. However, uncertainties remain about the nature of altered prior expectations and the degree to which they vary with the emergence of psychosis. We explored how expectations arising at two different levels-cognitive and perceptual-influenced processing of sensory information and whether relative influences of higher- and lower-level priors differed across people with prodromal symptoms and those with psychotic illness. In two complementary auditory perception experiments, 91 participants (30 with first-episode psychosis, 29 at clinical risk for psychosis, and 32 controls) were required to decipher a phoneme within ambiguous auditory input. Expectations were generated in two ways: an accompanying visual input of lip movements observed during auditory presentation or through written presentation of a phoneme provided prior to auditory presentation. We determined how these different types of information shaped auditory perceptual experience, how this was altered across the prodromal and established phases of psychosis, and how this relates to cingulate glutamate levels assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The psychosis group relied more on high-level cognitive priors compared to both healthy controls and those at clinical risk for psychosis and relied more on low-level perceptual priors than the clinical risk group. The risk group was marginally less reliant on low-level perceptual priors than controls. The results are consistent with previous theory that influences of prior expectations in perceptions in psychosis differ according to level of prior and illness phase. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).Wellcome Trus

Action selection in early stages of psychosis: an active inference approach

BACKGROUND: To interact successfully with their environment, humans need to build a model to make sense of noisy and ambiguous inputs. An inaccurate model, as suggested to be the case for people with psychosis, disturbs optimal action selection. Recent computational models, such as active inference, have emphasized the importance of action selection, treating it as a key part of the inferential process. Based on an active inference framework, we sought to evaluate previous knowledge and belief precision in an action-based task, given that alterations in these parameters have been linked to the development of psychotic symptoms. We further sought to determine whether task performance and modelling parameters would be suitable for classification of patients and controls. METHODS: Twenty-three individuals with an at-risk mental state, 26 patients with first-episode psychosis and 31 controls completed a probabilistic task in which action choice (go/no-go) was dissociated from outcome valence (gain or loss). We evaluated group differences in performance and active inference model parameters and performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to assess group classification. RESULTS: We found reduced overall performance in patients with psychosis. Active inference modelling revealed that patients showed increased forgetting, reduced confidence in policy selection and less optimal general choice behaviour, with poorer action-state associations. Importantly, ROC analysis showed fair-to-good classification performance for all groups, when combining modelling parameters and performance measures. LIMITATIONS: The sample size is moderate. CONCLUSION: Active inference modelling of this task provides further explanation for dysfunctional mechanisms underlying decision-making in psychosis and may be relevant for future research on the development of biomarkers for early identification of psychosis

Towards a mechanistic understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying psychosis

Psychotic symptoms are prevalent in a wide variety of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Yet, despite decades of research, the neurobiological mechanisms via which these symptoms come to manifest themselves remain to be elucidated. I argue in this thesis that using a mechanistic approach towards understanding psychosis that borrows heavily from the predictive coding framework, can help us understand the relationship between neurobiology and symptomology. In the first results chapter I present new data on a biomarker that has often been cited in relation to psychotic disorders, which is glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), as measured with magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In this chapter I aimed to replicate previous results that show differences in glutamate levels in psychosis and health. However, no statistically significant group differences and correlations with symptomology were found. In order to elucidate the potential mechanism underlying glutamate changes in the anterior cingulate cortex in psychosis, I tested whether a pharmacological challenge of Bromocriptine or Sulpiride altered glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex. However, no significant group differences were found, between medication groups. In the second results chapter I aimed to address a long-standing question in the field of computational psychiatry, which is whether prior expectations have a stronger or weaker influence on inference in psychosis. I go on to show that this depends on the origin of the prior expectation and disease stage. That is, cognitive priors are stronger in first episode psychosis but not in people at risk for psychosis, whereas perceptual priors seem to be weakened in individuals at risk for psychosis compared to healthy individuals and individuals with first episode psychosis. Furthermore, there is some evidence that these alterations are correlated with glutamate levels. In the third results chapter I aimed to elucidate the nature of reward prediction error aberrancies in chronic schizophrenia. There has been some evidence suggesting that schizophrenia is associated with aberrant coding of reward prediction errors during reinforcement learning. However it is unclear whether these aberrancies are related to disease years and medication use. Here I provide evidence for a small but significant alteration in the coding of reward prediction errors that is correlated with medication use. In the fourth results chapter I aimed to study the influence of uncertainty on the coding of unsigned prediction errors during learning. It has been hypothesized by predictive coding theorists that dopamine plays a role in the precision-weighting of unsigned prediction error. This theory is of particular relevance to psychosis research, as this might provide a mechanism via which dopamine aberrancies, might lead to psychotic symptoms. I found that blocking dopamine using Sulpiride abolishes precision-weighting of unsigned prediction error, providing evidence for a dopamine mediated precision-weighting mechanism. In the fifth results chapter I aimed to extend this research into early psychosis, to elucidate whether psychosis is indeed associated with a failure to precision-weight prediction error. I found that first episode psychosis is indeed associated with a failure to precision-weight prediction errors, an effect that is explained by the experience of positive symptoms. In the sixth results chapter I explore whether the degree of precision-weighting of unsigned prediction errors is correlated with glutamate levels in the anterior cingulate cortex. Such a correlation might be plausible given that psychosis has been associated with both. However, I did not find such a relationship, even in a sample of 137 individuals. Thus I concluded that anterior cingulate glutamate levels might be more related to non-positive symptoms associated with psychotic disorders. In summary, a mechanistic approach towards understanding psychosis can give us valuable insights into the disease mechanisms at play. I have shown here that the influence of expectations on perception is different across disease stage in psychosis. Furthermore, aberrancies in prediction error mechanisms might explain positive symptoms in psychosis, a process likely mediated by dopaminergic mechanisms, whereas evidence for glutamatergic mediation remains absent.Funded by Neuroscience in Psychiatry Network studentship

The promise of layer-specific neuroimaging for testing predictive coding theories of psychosis

Predictive coding potentially provides an explanatory model for understanding the neurocognitive mechanisms of psychosis. It proposes that cognitive processes, such as perception and inference, are implemented by a hierarchical system, with the influence of each level being a function of the estimated precision of beliefs at that level. However, predictive coding models of psychosis are insufficiently constrained—any phenomenon can be explained in multiple ways by postulating different changes to precision at different levels of processing. One reason for the lack of constraint in these models is that the core processes are thought to be implemented by the function of specific cortical layers, and the technology to measure layer specific neural activity in humans has until recently been lacking. As a result, our ability to constrain the models with empirical data has been limited. In this review we provide a brief overview of predictive processing models of psychosis and then describe the potential for newly developed, layer specific neuroimaging techniques to test and thus constrain these models. We conclude by discussing the most promising avenues for this research as well as the technical and conceptual challenges which may limit its application

A continuum hypothesis of psychotomimetic rapid antidepressants

Ketamine, classical psychedelics and sleep deprivation are associated with rapid effects on depression. Interestingly, these interventions also have common psychotomimetic actions, mirroring aspects of psychosis such as an altered sense of self, perceptual distortions and distorted thinking. This raises the question whether these interventions might be acute antidepressants through the same mechanisms that underlie some of their psychotomimetic effects. That is, perhaps some symptoms of depression can be understood as occupying the opposite end of a spectrum where elements of psychosis can be found on the other side. This review aims at reviewing the evidence underlying a proposed continuum hypothesis of psychotomimetic rapid antidepressants, suggesting that a range of psychotomimetic interventions are also acute antidepressants as well as trying to explain these common features in a hierarchical predictive coding framework, where we hypothesise that these interventions share a common mechanism by increasing the flexibility of prior expectations. Neurobiological mechanisms at play and the role of different neuromodulatory systems affected by these interventions and their role in controlling the precision of prior expectations and new sensory evidence will be reviewed. The proposed hypothesis will also be discussed in relation to other existing theories of antidepressants. We also suggest a number of novel experiments to test the hypothesis and highlight research areas that could provide further insights, in the hope to better understand the acute antidepressant properties of these interventions

Action selection in early stages of psychosis: an active inference approach.

BACKGROUND: To interact successfully with their environment, humans need to build a model to make sense of noisy and ambiguous inputs. An inaccurate model, as suggested to be the case for people with psychosis, disturbs optimal action selection. Recent computational models, such as active inference, have emphasized the importance of action selection, treating it as a key part of the inferential process. Based on an active inference framework, we sought to evaluate previous knowledge and belief precision in an action-based task, given that alterations in these parameters have been linked to the development of psychotic symptoms. We further sought to determine whether task performance and modelling parameters would be suitable for classification of patients and controls. METHODS: Twenty-three individuals with an at-risk mental state, 26 patients with first-episode psychosis and 31 controls completed a probabilistic task in which action choice (go/no-go) was dissociated from outcome valence (gain or loss). We evaluated group differences in performance and active inference model parameters and performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses to assess group classification. RESULTS: We found reduced overall performance in patients with psychosis. Active inference modelling revealed that patients showed increased forgetting, reduced confidence in policy selection and less optimal general choice behaviour, with poorer action-state associations. Importantly, ROC analysis showed fair-to-good classification performance for all groups, when combining modelling parameters and performance measures. LIMITATIONS: The sample size is moderate. CONCLUSION: Active inference modelling of this task provides further explanation for dysfunctional mechanisms underlying decision-making in psychosis and may be relevant for future research on the development of biomarkers for early identification of psychosis