Genetic variants linked to myopic macular degeneration in persons with high myopia: CREAM Consortium

Purpose To evaluate the roles of known myopia-associated genetic variants for development of myopic macular degeneration (MMD) in individuals with high myopia (HM), using case-control studies from the Consortium of Refractive Error and Myopia (CREAM). Methods A candidate gene approach tested 50 myopia-associated loci for association with HM and MMD, using meta-analyses of case-control studies comprising subjects of European and Asian ancestry aged 30 to 80 years from 10 studies. Fifty loci with the strongest associations with myopia were chosen from a previous published GWAS study. Highly myopic (spherical equivalent [SE] -5.0 diopters [D]) cases with MMD (N = 348), and two sets of controls were enrolled: (1) the first set included 16,275 emmetropes (SE -0.5 D); and (2) second set included 898 highly myopic subjects (SE -5.0 D) without MMD. MMD was classified based on the International photographic classification for pathologic myopia (META-PM). Results In the first analysis, comprising highly myopic cases with MMD (N = 348) versus emmetropic controls without MMD (N = 16,275), two SNPs were significantly associated with high myopia in adults with HM and MMD: (1) rs10824518 (P = 6.20E-07) in KCNMA1, which is highly expressed in human retinal and scleral tissues; and (2) rs524952 (P = 2.32E-16) near GJD2. In the second analysis, comprising highly myopic cases with MMD (N = 348) versus highly myopic controls without MMD (N = 898), none of the SNPs studied reached Bonferroni-corrected significance. Conclusions Of the 50 myopia-associated loci, we did not find any variant specifically associated with MMD, but the KCNMA1 and GJD2 loci were significantly associated with HM in highly myopic subjects with MMD, compared to emmetropes

A new polygenic score for refractive error improves detection of children at risk of high myopia but not the prediction of those at risk of myopic macular degeneration

Background High myopia (HM), defined as a spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) ≤ −6.00 diopters (D), is a leading cause of sight impairment, through myopic macular degeneration (MMD). We aimed to derive an improved polygenic score (PGS) for predicting children at risk of HM and to test if a PGS is predictive of MMD after accounting for SER. Methods The PGS was derived from genome-wide association studies in participants of UK Biobank, CREAM Consortium, and Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging. MMD severity was quantified by a deep learning algorithm. Prediction of HM was quantified as the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Prediction of severe MMD was assessed by logistic regression. Findings In independent samples of European, African, South Asian and East Asian ancestry, the PGS explained 19% (95% confidence interval 17–21%), 2% (1–3%), 8% (7–10%) and 6% (3–9%) of the variation in SER, respectively. The AUROC for HM in these samples was 0.78 (0.75–0.81), 0.58 (0.53–0.64), 0.71 (0.69–0.74) and 0.67 (0.62–0.72), respectively. The PGS was not associated with the risk of MMD after accounting for SER: OR = 1.07 (0.92–1.24). Interpretation Performance of the PGS approached the level required for clinical utility in Europeans but not in other ancestries. A PGS for refractive error was not predictive of MMD risk once SER was accounted fo

The genetics of myopia

Myopia is the most common eye condition worldwide and its prevalence is increasing. While changes in environment, such as time spent outdoors, have driven myopia rates, within populations myopia is highly heritable. Genes are estimated to explain up to 80% of the variance in refractive error. Initial attempts to identify myopia genes relied on family studies using linkage analysis or candidate gene approaches with limited progress. More genome-wide association study (GWAS) approaches have taken over, ultimately resulting in the identification of hundreds of genes for refractive error and myopia, providing new insights into its molecular machinery. These studies showed myopia is a complex trait, with many genetic variants of small effect influencing retinal signaling, eye growth and the normal process of emmetropization. The genetic architecture and its molecular mechanisms are still to be clarified and while genetic risk score prediction models are improving, this knowledge must be expanded to have impact on clinical practice

Whole exome sequence analysis in 51 624 participants identifies novel genes and variants associated with refractive error and myopia

Refractive errors are associated with a range of pathological conditions, such as myopic maculopathy and glaucoma, and are highly heritable. Studies of missense and putative loss of function (pLOF) variants identified via whole exome sequencing (WES) offer the prospect of directly implicating potentially causative disease genes. We performed a genome-wide association study for refractive error in 51 624 unrelated adults, of European ancestry, aged 40–69 years from the UK and genotyped using WES. After testing 29 179 pLOF and 495 263 missense variants, 1 pLOF and 18 missense variants in 14 distinct genomic regions were taken forward for fine-mapping analysis. This yielded 19 putative causal variants of which 18 had a posterior inclusion probability >0.5. Of the 19 putative causal variants, 12 were novel discoveries. Specific variants were associated with a more myopic refractive error, while others were associated with a more hyperopic refractive error. Association with age of onset of spectacle wear (AOSW) was examined in an independent validation sample (38 100 early AOSW cases and 74 243 controls). Of 11 novel variants that could be tested, 8 (73%) showed evidence of association with AOSW status. This work identified COL4A4 and ATM as novel candidate genes associated with refractive error. In addition, novel putative causal variants were identified in the genes RASGEF1, ARMS2, BMP4, SIX6, GSDMA, GNGT2, ZNF652 and CRX. Despite these successes, the study also highlighted the limitations of community-based WES studies compared with high myopia case–control WES studies

Myopic presentation of central serous chorioretinopathy

Purpose: To increase insight into the myopic presentation of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) by comparing a large group of myopic patients with CSC with reference groups with only one of the diagnoses. Methods: Myopic patients with CSC (spherical equivalent #23D, n = 46), emmetropic patients with CSC (spherical equivalent 20.5 to 0.5 D, n = 83), and myopic, non-CSC patients (n = 50) were included in this multicenter cross-sectional study. Disease characteristics and imaging parameters, such as subfoveal choroidal thickness and indocyanine green angiography patterns, were compared between cases and reference groups. Results: In myopic patients with CSC, median subfoveal choroidal thickness (286 mm [IQR 226-372 mm]) was significantly thicker than subfoveal choroidal thickness in myopic, non-CSC patients (200 mm [IQR 152-228 mm], P , 0.001) but thinner than emmetropic patients with CSC (452 mm [IQR 342-538 mm], P , 0.001). They also had pachyvessels in 70% of the eyes comparable with emmetropic CSC (76%, P = 0.70). Choroidal hyperpermeability was frequently present on indocyanine green angiography in both myopic and emmetropic CSC eyes. Need for treatment, treatment success, and recurrence rate were not significantly different between CSC groups. Conclusion: Myopic CSC presents with similar imaging and clinical characteristics as emmetropic CSC, apart from their thinner choroids. Keeping in mind the structural changes of myopia, other imaging characteristics could aid the diagnostic process

The Role of GJD2(Cx36) in Refractive Error Development

Refractive errors are common eye disorders characterized by a mismatch between the focal power of the eye and its axial length. An increased axial length is a common cause of the refractive error myopia (nearsightedness). The substantial increase in myopia prevalence over the last decades has raised public health concerns because myopia can lead to severe ocular complications later in life. Genomewide association studies (GWAS) have made considerable contributions to the understanding of the genetic architecture of refractive errors. Among the hundreds of genetic variants identified, common variants near the gap junction delta-2 (GJD2) gene have consistently been reported as one of the top hits. GJD2 encodes the connexin 36 (Cx36) protein, which forms gap junction channels and is highly expressed in the neural retina. In this review, we provide current evidence that links GJD2(Cx36) to the development of myopia. We summarize the gap junctional communication in the eye and the specific role of GJD2(Cx36) in retinal processing of visual signals. Finally, we discuss the pathways involving dopamine and gap junction phosphorylation and coupling as potential mechanisms that may explain the role of GJD2(Cx36) in refractive error development

Whole exome sequence analysis in 51 624 participants identifies novel genes and variants associated with refractive error and myopia

Refractive errors are associated with a range of pathological conditions, such as myopic maculopathy and glaucoma, and are highly heritable. Studies of missense and putative loss of function (pLOF) variants identified via whole exome sequencing (WES) offer the prospect of directly implicating potentially causative disease genes. We performed a genome-wide association study for refractive error in 51 624 unrelated adults, of European ancestry, aged 40-69 years from the UK and genotyped using WES. After testing 29 179 pLOF and 495 263 missense variants, 1 pLOF and 18 missense variants in 14 distinct genomic regions were taken forward for fine-mapping analysis. This yielded 19 putative causal variants of which 18 had a posterior inclusion probability >0.5. Of the 19 putative causal variants, 12 were novel discoveries. Specific variants were associated with a more myopic refractive error, while others were associated with a more hyperopic refractive error. Association with age of onset of spectacle wear (AOSW) was examined in an independent validation sample (38 100 early AOSW cases and 74 243 controls). Of 11 novel variants that could be tested, 8 (73%) showed evidence of association with AOSW status. This work identified COL4A4 and ATM as novel candidate genes associated with refractive error. In addition, novel putative causal variants were identified in the genes RASGEF1, ARMS2, BMP4, SIX6, GSDMA, GNGT2, ZNF652 and CRX. Despite these successes, the study also highlighted the limitations of community-based WES studies compared with high myopia case-control WES studies

Identification of Rare Variants Involved in High Myopia Unraveled by Whole Genome Sequencing

Purpose: Myopia (nearsightedness) is a condition in which a refractive error (RE) affects vision. Although common variants explain part of the genetic predisposition (18%), most of the estimated 70% heritability is missing. Here, we investigate the contribution of rare genetic variation because this might explain more of the missing heritability in the more severe forms of myopia. In particular, high myopia can lead to blindness and has a tremendous impact on a patient and at the societal level. The exact molecular mechanisms behind this condition are not yet completely unraveled, but whole genome sequencing (WGS) studies have the potential to identify novel (rare) disease genes, explaining the high heritability. Design: Cross-sectional study performed in the Netherlands. Participants: We investigated 159 European patients with high myopia (RE > −10 diopters). Methods: We performed WGS using a stepwise filtering approach and burden analysis. The contribution of common variants was calculated as a genetic risk score (GRS). Main Outcome Measures: Rare variant burden, GRS. Results: In 25% (n = 40) of these patients, there was a high (> 75th percentile) contribution of common predisposing variants; that is, these participants had higher GRSs. In 7 of the remaining 119 patients (6%), deleterious variants in genes associated with known (ocular) disorders, such as retinal dystrophy disease (prominin 1 [PROM1]) or ocular development (ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 6 [ABCB6], TGFB induced factor homeobox 1 [TGIF1]), were identified. Furthermore, without using a gene panel, we identified a high burden of rare variants in 8 novel genes associated with myopia. The genes heparan sulfate 6-O-sulfotransferase 1 (HS6ST1) (proportion in study population vs. the Genome Aggregation Database (GnomAD) 0.14 vs. 0.03, P = 4.22E-17), RNA binding motif protein 20 (RBM20) (0.15 vs. 0.06, P = 4.98E-05), and MAP7 domain containing 1 (MAP7D1) (0.19 vs. 0.06, P = 1.16E-10) were involved in the Wnt signaling cascade, melatonin degradation, and ocular development and showed most biologically plausible associations. Conclusions: We found different contributions of common and rare variants in low and high grade myopia. Using WGS, we identified some interesting candidate genes that could explain the high myopia phenotype in some patients. Financial Disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article

Whole exome sequencing of known eye genes reveals genetic causes for high myopia

High myopia [refractive error ≤ -6 diopters (D)] is a heterogeneous condition, and without clear accompanying features, it can be difficult to pinpoint a genetic cause. This observational study aimed to evaluate the utility of whole exome sequencing (WES) using an eye disorder gene panel in European patients with high myopia. Patients with high myopia were recruited by ophthalmologists and clinical geneticists. Clinical features were categorized into isolated high myopia, high myopia with other ocular involvement or with systemic involvement. WES was performed and an eye disorder gene panel of ~500 genes was evaluated. Hundred and thirteen patients with high myopia [mean (SD) refractive error - 11.8D (5.2)] were included. Of these, 53% were children younger than 12 years of age (53%), 13.3% were aged 12-18 years and 34% were adults (aged > 18 years). Twenty-three out of 113 patients (20%) received a genetic diagnosis of which 11 patients displayed additional ocular or systemic involvement. Pathogenic variants were identified in retinal dystrophy genes (e.g. GUCY2D and CACNA1F), connective tissue disease genes (e.g. COL18A1 and COL2A1), non-syndromic high myopia genes (ARR3), ocular development genes (e.g. PAX6) and other genes (ASPH and CNNM4). In 20% of our high myopic study population, WES using an eye gene panel enabled us to diagnose the genetic cause for this disorder. Eye genes known to cause retinal dystrophy, developmental or syndromic disorders can cause high myopia without apparent clinical features of other pathology