Nonoperative Management of Blunt Splenic Trauma: Also Feasible and Safe in Centers with Low Trauma Incidence and in the Presence of Established Risk Factors

Background: Treatment of blunt splenic trauma has undergone dramatic changes over the last few decades. Nonoperative management (NOM) is now the preferred treatment of choice, when possible. The outcome of NOM has been evaluated. This study evaluates the results following the management of blunt splenic injury in adults in a Swedish university hospital with a low blunt abdominal trauma incidence. Method: Fifty patients with blunt splenic trauma were treated at the Department of Surgery, Lund University Hospital from January 1994 to December 2003. One patient was excluded due to a diagnostic delay of > 24 h. Charts were reviewed retrospectively to examine demographics, injury Severity score (ISS), splenic injury grade, diagnostics, treatment and outcome measures. Results: Thirty-nine patients (80%) were initially treated nonoperatively (NOM), and ten (20%) patients underwent immediate surgery (operative management, OM). Only one (3%) patient failed NOM and required surgery nine days after admission (failure of NOM, FNOM). The patients in the OM group had higher ISS (p < 0.001), higher grade of splenic injury (p < 0.001), and were hemodynamically unstable to a greater extent (p < 0.001). This was accompanied by increased transfusion requirements (p < 0.001), longer stay in the ICU unit (p < 0.001) and higher costs (p = 0.001). Twenty-seven patients were successfully treated without surgery. No serious complication was found on routine radiological follow-up. Conclusion: Most patients in this study were managed conservatively with a low failure rate of NOM. NOM of blunt splenic trauma could thus be performed in a seemingly safe and effective manner, even in the presence of established risk factors. Routine follow-up with CT scan did not appear to add clinically relevant information affecting patient management

Proximal Splenic Artery Embolization In Blunt Splenic Trauma

Proximal embolization of the splenic artery (PSAE) has recently been reported for traumatic splenic injury. The suggested mechanism of action entails a decrease in the splenic blood pressure without ischemia due to collateral blood supply. The main complications of selective embolization are continuous bleeding, splenic infarcts and splenic abscesses. The main complications of observation alone are continuous bleeding and formation of splenic pseudoaneurysms. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of PSAE in the cessation of bleeding without formation of pseudoaneurysms, and the outcome of the spleen after such intervention. A prospective observational study of all patients undergoing PSAE for traumatic splenic injury in our institution over a 33-month period. Clinical and Doppler sonographic examinations were performed to assess cessation of bleeding, splenic blood flow, and formation of splenic pseudoaneurysms, infarcts or abscesses. During 33 months, 11 patients with blunt abdominal trauma and tomographic evidence of either high grade or actively bleeding splenic injuries were treated by PSAE. During follow-up, no patient underwent surgery or repeated embolization. Preserved blood flow was found on Doppler sonography in 82% of the patients and no pseudoaneurysms were demonstrated. A perisplenic collection was found in one patient and responded well to percutaneous drainage. Proximal embolization of the splenic artery for severe splenic injury is highly successful in cessation of bleeding while preserving splenic architecture. There were minimal complications in this series demonstrated by clinical and Doppler examinations