5 research outputs found

    Molecular basis of early epithelial response to streptococcal exotoxin: role of STIM1 and Orai1 proteins: Streptolysin O activates SOC entry

    No full text
    Streptolysin O (SLO) is a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin (CDC) from Streptococcus pyogenes. SLO induces diverse types of Ca2+ signalling in host cells which play a key role in membrane repair and cell fate determination. The mechanisms behind SLO-induced Ca2+ signalling remain poorly understood. Here, we show that in NCI-H441 cells, wild-type SLO as well as non-pore-forming mutant induces long-lasting intracellular Ca2+ oscillations via IP3-mediated depletion of intracellular stores and activation of store-operated Ca2+ (SOC) entry. SLO-induced activation of SOC entry was confirmed by Ca2+ add-back experiments, pharmacologically and by overexpression as well as silencing of STIM1 and Orai1 expression. SLO also activated SOC entry in primary cultivated alveolar type II (ATII) cells but Ca2+ oscillations were comparatively short-lived in nature. Comparison of STIM1 and Orai1 revealed a differential expression pattern in H441 and ATII cells. Overexpression of STIM1 and Orai1 proteins in ATII cells changed the short-lived oscillatory response into a long-lived one. Thus, we conclude that SLO-mediated Ca2+ signalling involves Ca2+ release from intracellular stores and STIM1/Orai1-dependent SOC entry. The phenotype of Ca2+ signalling depends on STIM1 and Orai1 expression levels. Our findings suggest a new role for SOC entry-associated proteins in S. pyogenes-induced lung infection and pneumonia

    A meta‐analysis on allergen‐specific immunotherapy using MCT ®

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: The World Allergy Organization and the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology recommend to perform product‐specific meta‐analyses for allergen‐specific immunotherapies because of the high degree of heterogeneity between individual products. This meta‐analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of Glutaraldehyde‐modified and MCT(®) (MicroCrystalline Tyrosine)‐adsorbed allergoids (MATA). METHODS: The databases MEDLINE, LILACS, embase, LIVIVO, Web of Science and Google (Scholar) were searched for publications on MATA up to June 2019. Primary endpoint was the combined symptom and medication score (CSMS). Secondary endpoints were single scores, immunogenicity and improvement of allergic condition. Secondary safety endpoints were the occurrence of side effects. A random effects model was applied with (standardized) mean differences ([S]MDs) including confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was analyzed using the I(2) index and publication bias using Egger's test and Funnel plots. Subgroups were analyzed regarding age and asthma status. RESULTS: Eight randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trials were selected for efficacy and 43 publications for safety analysis. In total, 4531 patients were included in this analysis including eight studies containing data on children and adolescents. AIT with MATA significantly reduced allergic symptoms and medication use with a SMD for CSMS of −0.8 (CI: −1.24, −0.36) in comparison to placebo. Heterogeneity was moderate between the studies. The total symptom score (−1.2 [CI: −2.11, −0.29]) and the total medication score (−2.2 [CI: −3.65, −0.74]) were also significantly reduced after MATA treatment. Patient's condition improved significantly after treatment with MATA, with an odds ratio of 3.05 (CI: 1.90, 4.90) when compared to placebo. The proportion of patients, who developed side effects was 38% (CI: 19%, 57%). No serious side effects occurred. Safety in the subgroups of asthmatic patients, children and adolescents did not differ from the overall patient population. CONCLUSIONS: This meta‐analysis reveals a large body of evidence from publications investigating MATA. MATA significantly improved allergic symptoms and reduced the use of anti‐allergic medication in comparison to placebo, with an excellent safety profile. Especially for children and asthmatic patients, the use of MATAs can be considered as safe, because the safety profiles in these groups did not differ from the total patient population

    Outer-Membrane Permeability of Bacteria

    No full text

    Clinical Features

    No full text
    corecore