91 research outputs found
Economics and science of hog manure handling and storage technologies
Non-Peer ReviewedHog production has been growing rapidly in Canada and this growth has created concerns over manure handling and the risk of soil and water contamination. There is limited information available to swine producers as to which technologies and manure management systems would best serve them both economically and environmentally. The objective of this study is to assess hog manure handling and storage systems and outline their environmental advantages and disadvantages. Five main technologies are reviewed which include (1) manure handling, (2) solid/liquid separation, (3) composting, (4) land application, and (5) manure storage. The average cost of hauling liquid manure within 2-3 mile distance is about 1.22 to 4.85 to 0.0039 to $0.0953 per gallon depending on availability of equipment and materials and additional costs may also required for adding a liner of clay. Other types of storage system generally cost higher but they might be more environmentally friendly. Operation and maintenance costs of manure storage is mainly limited with seasonal labor for agitation the waste, removal of sludge, and performing pump outs
Microwave Electronics
Contains reports on four research projects.United States Department of the ArmyUnited States Department of the NavyUnited States Department of the Air Force (Contract AF19(122)-458)Lincoln Laboratory (Purchase Order DDL-B222
Microwave Electronics
Contains research objectives and reports on four research projects.Department of the NavyDepartment of the Air Force under Contract AF19(122)-458Office of Naval Research under Contract Nonr 1845(05)Department of the ArmyLincoln Laboratory, Purchase Order DDL-B22
Plasma Dynamics
Contains research objectives and reports on three research projects.National Science Foundation under Grant G-9930Air Force Cambridge Research Center under Contract AF-19(604)-5992WADC Contract AF33(616)-3984, with the Electronic Systems LaboratoryContract AF19(604)-4551 with Air Force Cambridge Research CenterAtomic Energy Commission under Contract AT(30-1)184
Plasma Dynamics
Contains reports on two research projects.National Science Foundation under Grant G-9330WADD Contract AF33(616)-7624 with Flight Accessories Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OhioAtomic Energy Commission under Contract AT(30-1)-1842Air Force Command and Control Development Division under Contract AF19(604)-599
Plasma Dynamics
Contains reports on three research projects.National Science Foundation under Grant G-9330Air Force Cambridge Research Center under Contract AF-19(604)-5992United States Air Force (WADD Contract AF33(616)-3984)Contract AF19(604)-4551 with Air Force Cambridge Research CenterAeronautical Accessories Laboratory, Wright Air Development Division, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (Air Force Contract AF33(616)-3984, Project 8149, Task No. 61098)Atomic Energy Commission under Contract AT(30-1)-184
Plasma Dynamics
Contains reports on three research projects.United States Atomic Energy Commission (Contract AT(30-1)-1842)United States Air Force, Air Force Cambridge Research Center, Air Research and Development Command (Contract AF19(604)-5992)National Science Foundation (Grant G-9330)Flight Accessories Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WADD Contract AF33(616)-3984
Plasma Dynamics
Contains research objectives and reports on three research projects.Contract AF19(604)-4551 with Air Force Cambridge Research CenterAtomic Energy Commission under Contract AT(30-1)-1842Air Force Cambridge Research Center under Contract AF19(604)-5992National Science Foundation under Grant G-9330WADD Contract AF33(616)-7624 with Flight Accessories Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohi
Guidelines for reporting research using Systematic Coding of Observed human Behaviour (SCOBe)
Systematic coding of observed human behaviour (SCOBe) is used across disciplines and topics but methodological reporting is often incomplete. We developed internationally generated, interdisciplinary guidelines for methodological reporting of such research. Using Delphi methodology, a working group of 22 experts sought group consensus in three rounds. Participants first assessed an initial set of reporting criteria (round 1). Next, in interactive meetings participants revised these criteria and reached consensus on reporting content (rounds 2 & 3). We present 20 criteria constituting the first comprehensive reporting guidelines for SCOBe research using existing, newly developed, or modified coding systems. The criteria encompass three procedural domains: 1. Research context; 2. Properties of the coding scheme; and 3. Application of the coding scheme. The presented guidelines will assist in substantiating and assessing the quality of SCOBe research. We encourage researchers to adopt these guidelines, to enhance quality of mono- and interdisciplinary research
- …