Impaired aortic distensibility and elevated central blood pressure in Turner Syndrome:a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Abstract Background Women with Turner Syndrome have an increased risk for aortic dissection. Arterial stiffening is a risk factor for aortic dilatation and dissection. Here we investigate if arterial stiffening can be observed in Turner Syndrome patients and is an initial step in the development of aortic dilatation and subsequent dissection. Methods Fifty-seven women with Turner Syndrome (48 years [29–66]) and thirty-six age- and sex-matched controls (49 years [26–68]) were included. Distensibility, blood pressure, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), the augmentation index (Aix) and central blood pressure were determined using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, a 24-h blood pressure measurement and applanation tonometry. Aortic distensibility was determined at three locations: ascending aorta, transverse aortic arch, and descending aorta. Results Mean aortic distensibility in the descending aorta was significantly lower in Turner Syndrome compared to healthy controls (P = 0.02), however, this was due to a much lower distensibility among Turner Syndrome with coarctation, while Turner Syndrome without coarctation had similar distensibility as controls. Both the mean heart rate adjusted Aix (31.4% vs. 24.4%; P = 0.02) and central diastolic blood pressure (78.8 mmHg vs. 73.7 mmHg; P = 0.02) were higher in Turner Syndrome compared to controls, and these indices correlated significantly with ambulatory night-time diastolic blood pressure. The presence of aortic coarctation (r = − 0.44, P = 0.005) and a higher central systolic blood pressure (r = − 0.34, P = 0.03), age and presence of diabetes were inversely correlated with aortic distensibility in TS. Conclusion Aortic wall function in the descending aorta is impaired in Turner Syndrome with lower distensibility among those with coarctation of the aorta, and among all Turner Syndrome higher Aix, and elevated central diastolic blood pressure when compared to sex- and age-matched controls. Trial registration The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT01678274) on September 3, 2012

Cell-Free DNA Screening Positive for Monosomy X: Clinical Evaluation and Management of Suspected Maternal or Fetal Turner Syndrome

Initially provided as an alternate to evaluation of serum analytes and nuchal translucency for the evaluation of pregnancies at high-risk of Trisomy 21, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for fetal aneuploidy, also referred to as non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), can now also screen for fetal sex chromosome anomalies (SCAs) such as monosomy X as early as 9 to 10 weeks of gestation. Early identification of Turner syndrome, a SCA resulting from the complete or partial absence of the second X chromosome, allows for medical interventions such as optimizing obstetrical outcomes, hormone replacement therapy, fertility protection and support as well improved neurocognitive outcomes. However, cfDNA screening for SCAs and monosomy X in particular is associated with high false positive rates and low positive predictive value. A cfDNA result positive for monosomy X may represent fetal TS, maternal TS, or confined placental mosaicism. A positive screen for monosomy X with discordant results of diagnostic fetal karyotype presents unique interpretation and management challenges due to potential implications for previously unrecognized maternal Turner syndrome (TS). . The current international consensus clinical practice guidelines for the care of individuals with TS throughout the lifespan do not specifically address management of individuals with a cfDNA screen positive for monosomy X. The objective of this manuscript is to provide context and expert-driven recommendations for maternal and/or fetal evaluation and management when cfDNA screening is positive for monosomy X. We highlight unique challenges of cfDNA screening that is incidentally positive for monosomy X, present recommendations for determining if the result is a true positive and discuss when diagnosis of TS is applicable to the fetus or the mother. While we defer the subsequent management of confirmed TS to the clinical practice guidelines, we highlight unique considerations for these individuals initially identified through cfDNA screening

Additional file 1: of Impaired aortic distensibility and elevated central blood pressure in Turner Syndrome: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study

Table S1. Aortic distensibility in women with Turner Syndrome but no aortic coarctation compared to healthy age and gender matched controls. Overall model P-valu