6 research outputs found
Intracortical Remodeling Parameters Are Associated With Measures of Bone Robustness
Prior work identified a novel association between bone robustness and porosity, which may be part of a broader interaction whereby the skeletal system compensates for the natural variation in robustness (bone width relative to length) by modulating tissue‐level mechanical properties to increase stiffness of slender bones and to reduce mass of robust bones. To further understand this association, we tested the hypothesis that the relationship between robustness and porosity is mediated through intracortical, BMU‐based (basic multicellular unit) remodeling. We quantified cortical porosity, mineralization, and histomorphometry at two sites (38% and 66% of the length) in human cadaveric tibiae. We found significant correlations between robustness and several histomorphometric variables (e.g., % secondary tissue [R 2 = 0.68, P < 0.004], total osteon area [R 2 = 0.42, P < 0.04]) at the 66% site. Although these associations were weaker at the 38% site, significant correlations between histological variables were identified between the two sites indicating that both respond to the same global effects and demonstrate a similar character at the whole bone level. Thus, robust bones tended to have larger and more numerous osteons with less infilling, resulting in bigger pores and more secondary bone area. These results suggest that local regulation of BMU‐based remodeling may be further modulated by a global signal associated with robustness, such that remodeling is suppressed in slender bones but not in robust bones. Elucidating this mechanism further is crucial for better understanding the complex adaptive nature of the skeleton, and how interindividual variation in remodeling differentially impacts skeletal aging and an individuals' potential response to prophylactic treatments. Anat Rec, 297:1817–1828, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108629/1/ar22962.pd
Stress radiography Is a reliable method to quantify posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: A systematic review
PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of posterior tibial stress radiography techniques and radiographic measurement methods to compare their accuracy and efficacy to aid clinicians in quantifying posterior cruciate ligament laxity.
METHODS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase.com 1947- , Ovid Medline 1946- , Scopus 1823- , Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinicaltrials.gov 1997- were queried in December 2020. The abstracts of articles were reviewed by 2 authors for published studies comparing posterior tibial stress radiography techniques, describing, and comparing radiographic measurement methods, and comparing stress radiographs with instrumented knee testing.
RESULTS: The systematic review included 13 studies that satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were 3 studies comparing stress radiography with instrumented knee devices, 6 studies comparing stress radiography techniques, and 5 studies evaluating the reliability of radiographic measurements. Stress radiography was more sensitive for detecting posterior tibial translation than KT-1000 and KT-2000 and was similar to the Rolimeter knee arthrometer. The majority of studies found TELOS stress radiography to be more sensitive than gravity or hamstring contraction stress views. Kneeling stress radiographs were found to be equivalent to TELOS in one study and superior in another. All reported methods of radiographic measurement for posterior tibial translation showed good-to-excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability, and no single technique demonstrated clear superiority.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review indicate that posterior stress radiography with TELOS and kneeling stress radiography are the most reliable methods to evaluate posterior cruciate ligament laxity. Gravity stress and hamstring contraction can be used but may underestimate posterior tibial translation. Radiographic measurement methods are reliable and no single method is clearly superior.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This information will allow clinicians to use various radiographic methods to objectively measure posterior tibial translation to formulate a treatment plan
Global variation in studies of articular cartilage procedures of the knee: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether there are significant differences in terms of indications, techniques, patient variables, and objective and subjective outcome scores as a function of the geographic locale of published studies of knee articular cartilage surgery.
METHODS: An electronic database search was performed of clinical studies evaluating knee articular cartilage procedures from 2000 to 2021. Studies were separated into global regions (Europe, Asia, North America, and South America) based on the study country. All cartilage-based treatments in each region were recorded. Patient age and sex, mechanism of injury, cartilage lesion size and location, follow-up time, failure rate, and knee outcome scores utilized were summarized and compared by region.
RESULTS: A total of 2,923 studies were analyzed. Eighty level 1 and 2 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were from Europe (
CONCLUSION: Most high-level evidence for articular cartilage-based procedures of the knee comes from European countries. These studies vary by patient age and sex, anatomic location, and mechanism of injury. Global variation should be taken into consideration when interpreting and applying studies of knee articular cartilage surgery
Global variation in studies of articular cartilage procedures of the knee: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether there are significant differences in terms of indications, techniques, patient variables, and objective and subjective outcome scores as a function of the geographic locale of published studies of knee articular cartilage surgery.
METHODS: An electronic database search was performed of clinical studies evaluating knee articular cartilage procedures from 2000 to 2021. Studies were separated into global regions (Europe, Asia, North America, and South America) based on the study country. All cartilage-based treatments in each region were recorded. Patient age and sex, mechanism of injury, cartilage lesion size and location, follow-up time, failure rate, and knee outcome scores utilized were summarized and compared by region.
RESULTS: A total of 2,923 studies were analyzed. Eighty level 1 and 2 studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority were from Europe (
CONCLUSION: Most high-level evidence for articular cartilage-based procedures of the knee comes from European countries. These studies vary by patient age and sex, anatomic location, and mechanism of injury. Global variation should be taken into consideration when interpreting and applying studies of knee articular cartilage surgery
The Loop ‘N’ Tack Biceps Tenodesis: An All-Arthroscopic, Intra-Articular Technique
Tenodesis and tenotomy of the long head of the biceps are treatment options for a wide range of pathologies without clear superior technique or site of fixation. Clinical outcomes comparing numerous techniques for tenotomy versus tenodesis have resulted in similar pain relief; however, tenotomy may result in a cosmetic “Popeye” deformity and fatigue pain. We present a quick, simple, and knotless technique for tenodesis of the long head of the biceps at the proximal aspect of the bicipital grove that can be completed entirely arthroscopically. This technique uses suture to secure a tenotomized proximal biceps tendon to a knotless anchor just proximal to the subscapularis tendon at the proximal biceps groove. The tensionless repair allows the biceps to scar within the biceps groove, thereby reducing subsidence and formation of a “Popeye'' deformity and fatigue pain in the biceps seen with tenotomy alone while eliminating the ability to overtension