15 research outputs found
A Model of Chaotic Drug Markets and Their Control
Drug markets are often described informally as being chaotic, and there is a tendency
to believe that control efforts can make things worse, not better, at least in some circumstances.
This paper explores the idea that such statements might be literally true in a mathematical sense
by considering a discrete-time model of populations of drug users and drug sellers for which
initiation into either population is a function of relative numbers of both populations. The
structure of the system follows that considered in an arms control context by Behrens et al.
(1997). In this context, the model suggests that depending on the market parameter values, the
uncontrolled system may or may not be chaotic. Static application of either treatment or enforcement
applied to a system that is not initially chaotic can make it chaotic and vice versa, but
even if static control would create chaos, dynamic controls can be crafted that avoid it. Socalled
OGY controls seem to work well for this example
A Model of Moderation: Finding Skiba Points on a Slippery Slope
A simple model is considered that rewards ”moderation” - finding the
right balance between sliding down either of two ”slippery slopes”. Optimal
solutions are computed as a function of two key parameters: (1) the cost of
resisting the underlying uncontrolled dynamics and (2) the discount rate.
Analytical expressions are derived for bifurcation lines separating regions
where it is optimal to fight to stay balanced, to give in to the attraction
of the ”left” or the ”right”, or to decide based on one’s initial state. The
latter case includes situations both with and without so-called Dechert-
Nishimura-Skiba (DNS) points defining optimal solution strategies. The
model is unusual for having two DNS points in a one-state model, having
a single DNS point that bifurcates into two DNS points, and for the ability
to explicitly graph regions within which DNS points occur in the 2-D
parameter space. The latter helps give intuition and insight concerning
conditions under which these interesting points occur
An Age-Structured Single-State Initiation Model -- Cycles of Drug Epidemics and Optimal Prevention Programs
This paper introduces a model for drug initiation that extends traditional dynamic models by considering explicitly the age distribution of the users. On the basis of a 2-groups model in which the population in split into a user and a non-user group the advantage of a continuous age distribution is shown by considering more details and by yielding new results. Neglecting death rates reduces the model to a single state (1-group) descriptive model which can still simulate some of the complex behavior of drug epidemics such as repeated cycles. Furthermore, prevention programs - especially school-based programs - can eb targeted to certain age classes. So in order to discover how best to allocate resources to prevention programs over different age classes we formulate and solve optimal control models
High and Low Frequency Oscillations in Drug Epidemics
We extend the two-dimensional model of drug use introduced in Behrens et al. [1999, 2000, 2002] by introducing two additional states that model in more detail newly initiated (“light”) users’ response to the drug experience. Those who dislike the drug quickly “quit” and briefly suppress initiation by others. Those who like the drug progress to ongoing (“moderate”) use, from which they may or may not escalate to “heavy” or dependent use. Initiation is spread contagiously by light and moderate users, but is moderated by the drug’s reputation, which is a function of the number of unhappy users (recent quitters + heavy users). The model reproduces recent prevalence data from the U.S. cocaine epidemic reasonably well, with one pronounced peak followed by decay toward a steady state. However, minor variation in parameter values yields both long-run periodicity with a period akin to the gap between the first U.S. cocaine epidemic (peak ~1910) and the current one (peak ~1980), as well as short-run periodicity akin to that observed in data on youthful use for a variety of substances. The combination of short- and long-run periodicity is reminiscent of the elliptical burstors described by Rubin and Terman [2002]. The existence of such complex behavior including cycles, quasi periodic solutions, and chaos is proven by means of bifurcation analysis
Bifurcating DNS Thresholds in a Model of Organizational Bridge Building
A simple optimal control model is introduced, where “bridge building”
positions are rewarded. The optimal solutions can be classified in regards
of the two extern parameters, (1) costs for the control staying at such
an exposed position and (2) the discount rate. A complete analytical
description of the bifurcation lines in parameter space is derived, which
separates regions with different optimal behavior. These are resisting the
influence from inner and outer forces, always fall off from the boundaries
or decide based on one’s initial state. This latter case gives rise to the
emergence of so-called Dechert-Nishimura-Skiba (DNS) points describing
optimal solution strategies. Furthermore the bifurcation from a single
DNS point into two DNS points has been analyzed in parameter space.
All these strategies have a funded interpretation within the limits of the
model
Optimizing Counter-Terror Operations: Should One Fight Fire with "Fire" or "Water"?
This paper deals dynamically with the question of how recruitment
to terror organizations is influenced by counter-terror operations. This is
done within a optimal control model, where the key state is the (relative)
number of terrorists and the key controls are two types of counter-terror
tactics, one (“water”) that does not one (“fire”) that does provoke recruitment
of new terrorists. The model is nonlinear and does not admit
analytical solutions, but an efficient numerical implementation of Pontryagin’s
Minimum Principle allows for solution with base case parameters and
considerable sensitivity analysis. Generally this model yields two different
steady states, one where the terror-organization is nearly eradicated and
one with a high number of terrorists. Whereas water strategies are used at
almost any time, it can be optimal not to use fire strategies if the number
of terrorists is below a certain threshold
Cycles of Violence: A Dynamic Control Analysis (or Model?)
This paper introduce and analyze a simple model of cycle of violence in which oscillations are generated when surges in lethal violence shrink the pool of active violent offenders. Models with such endogenously induced variation may help explain why historically observed trends in violence are generally not well correlated with exogenous forcing functions, such as changes in the state of the economy. The analysis includes finding the optimal dynamic trajectory of incarceration and violence prevention inteverventions. Those trajectories yield some surprising results, including situations in which myopic decision makers will invest more in prevention than will far-sighted decision makers
Incentive Stackelberg Strategies for a Dynamic Game on Terrorism
This paper presents a dynamic game model of international terrorism.
The time horizon is finite, about the size of one presidency,
or infinite. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of incentive Stackelberg
strategies for both decision-makers of the game (“The West”
and “International Terror Organization”) allows statements about the
possibilities and limitations of terror control interventions. Recurrent
behavior is excluded with monotonic variation in the frequency of
terror attacks whose direction depends on when the terror organization
launches its terror war. Even optimal pacing of terror control
operations does not greatly alter the equilibrium of the infinite horizon
game, but outcomes from the West’s perspective can be greatly
improved if the game is only “played” for brief periods of time and
if certain parameters could be influenced, notably those pertaining to
the terror organization’s ability to recruit replacements
High and Low Frequency Oscillations in Drug Epidemics
We extend the two-dimensional model of drug use introduced in Behrens et al. [1999, 2000, 2002] by introducing two additional states that model in more detail newly initiated (“light”) users’ response to the drug experience. Those who dislike the drug quickly “quit” and briefly suppress initiation by others. Those who like the drug progress to ongoing (“moderate”) use, from which they may or may not escalate to “heavy” or dependent use. Initiation is spread contagiously by light and moderate users, but is moderated by the drug’s reputation, which is a function of the number of unhappy users (recent quitters + heavy users). The model reproduces recent prevalence data from the U.S. cocaine epidemic reasonably well, with one pronounced peak followed by decay toward a steady state. However, minor variation in parameter values yields both long-run periodicity with a period akin to the gap between the first U.S. cocaine epidemic (peak ~1910) and the current one (peak ~1980), as well as short-run periodicity akin to that observed in data on youthful use for a variety of substances. The combination of short- and long-run periodicity is reminiscent of the elliptical burstors described by Rubin and Terman [2002]. The existence of such complex behavior including cycles, quasi periodic solutions, and chaos is proven by means of bifurcation analysis
Cycles of Violence: A Dynamic Control Analysis (or Model?)
We introduce and analyze a simple model of cycle of violence in which oscillations are generated when surges in lethal violence shrink the pool of active violent offenders. Models with such endogenously induced variation may help explain why historically observed trends in violence are generally not well correlated with exogenous forcing functions, such as changes in the state of the economy. The analysis includes finding the optimal dynamic trajectory of incarceration and violence prevention inteverventions. Those trajectories yield some surprising results, including situations in which myopic decision makers will invest more in prevention than will far-sighted decision makers