BRCA1 and CtIP suppress long tract gene conversion between sister chromatids

BRCA1 controls early steps of the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) pathway of homologous recombination, but has no known role following Rad51-mediated synapsis. Here we show that BRCA1 influences post-synaptic homologous recombination events, controlling the balance between short- (STGC) and long-tract gene conversion (LTGC) between sister chromatids. Brca1 mutant cells reveal a bias towards LTGC that is corrected by expression of wild type but not cancer-predisposing BRCA1 alleles. The LTGC bias is enhanced by depletion of CtIP but reversed by inhibition of 53BP1, implicating DNA end resection as a contributor to the STGC/LTGC balance. The impact of BRCA1/CtIP loss on the STGC/LTGC balance is abolished when the second (non-invading) end of the break is unable to support termination of STGC by homologous pairing (“annealing”). This suggests that BRCA1/CtIP-mediated processing of the second end of the break controls the annealing step that normally terminates SDSA, thereby suppressing the error-prone LTGC outcome

BRCA1 controls homologous recombination at Tus/Ter-stalled mammalian replication forks

Replication fork stalling can promote genomic instability, predisposing to cancer and other diseases1–3. Stalled replication forks may be processed by sister chromatid recombination (SCR), generating error-free or error-prone homologous recombination (HR) outcomes4–8. In mammalian cells, a long-standing hypothesis proposes that the major hereditary breast/ovarian cancer predisposition gene products, BRCA1 and BRCA2, control HR/SCR at stalled replication forks9. Although BRCA1 and BRCA2 affect replication fork processing10–12, direct evidence that BRCA genes regulate HR at stalled chromosomal replication forks is lacking due to a dearth of tools for studying this process. We report that the Escherichia coli Tus/Ter complex13–16 can be engineered to induce site-specific replication fork stalling and chromosomal HR/SCR in mammalian cells. Tus/Ter-induced HR entails processing of bidirectionally arrested forks. We find that the BRCA1 C-terminal tandem BRCT repeat and regions of BRCA1 encoded by exon 11—two BRCA1 elements implicated in tumor suppression—control Tus/Ter-induced HR. Inactivation of either BRCA1 or BRCA2 increases the absolute frequency of “long-tract” gene conversions at Tus/Ter-stalled forks—an outcome not observed in response to a restriction endonuclease-mediated chromosomal double strand break (DSB). Therefore, HR at stalled forks is regulated differently from HR at DSBs arising independently of a fork. We propose that aberrant long-tract HR at stalled replication forks contributes to genomic instability and breast/ovarian cancer predisposition in BRCA mutant cells

A protective role for BRCA2 at stalled replication forks

The hereditary breast and ovarian cancer predisposition genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for the lion's share of heritable breast cancer risk in the human population. Loss of function of either gene results in defective homologous recombination (HR) and triggers genomic instability, accelerating breast tumorigenesis. A long-standing hypothesis proposes that BRCA1 and BRCA2 mediate HR following attempted replication across damaged DNA, ensuring error-free processing of the stalled replication fork. A recent paper describes a new replication fork protective function of BRCA2, which appears to collaborate with its HR function to suppress genomic instability

Tissue polarity meets nuclear function: Polarity as a modulator of cell proliferation and DNA repair

Establishment of baso-apical polarity, a fundamental property of tissue architecture in epithelial cells is involved in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis. Recent data suggests that nuclear organization also participates in tissue homeostasis. I have used three-dimensional (3D) culture system that can reproduce different levels of polarity to explore the relationship between nuclear organization and tissue polarity in the control of cell fate. The HMT-3522 non-neoplastic mammary epithelial cells (S1) differentiate to form baso-apically polarized structures (acini) in 3D culture in the presence of laminin rich basement membrane (BM). Under similar 3D culture conditions, tumor (T4-2) cells form tumor-like nodules and upon induction of phenotypic reversion, T4-2 cells form tissue structures (spheroids) that have basal, but no apical polarity (RT4-2). I show that RT4-2 cells display nuclear structural characteristics of acinar differentiation. Alteration of nuclear organization in S1 acini and RT4-2 spheroids by treatment with anti-NuMA (nuclear mitotic apparatus protein) antibodies leads to loss of differentiation. However, while non-neoplastic cells subsequently undergo apoptosis, reverted tumor cells enter the cell cycle. My results demonstrate that the impact of nuclear organization on cell fate depends on the status of tissue polarity. Cell contact with the BM is required for the establishment of basal polarity. Loss of cell-BM interaction in cancer is characterized by accumulation of genomic instability in the form of mutations. I asked whether cell-BM interaction will affect DNA repair in mammary epithelial cells. My results demonstrate that basally polarized S1 and RT4-2 cells undergo DNA repair and the DNA damage response in S1 and RT4-2 cells involves activation of ATM and p53. Furthermore, inhibition of PI3 kinase decreased DNA repair in S1 and RT4-2 cells. When RT4-2 cells were cultured in the absence of BM, the DNA repair activity was decreased. Blocking alpha 6 integrin signaling in RT4-2 cells also resulted in decrease in DNA repair activity. The above results demonstrate the importance of cell-BM interaction in the DNA repair of RT4-2 cells. Overall, the results from this thesis reinforce the importance of tissue polarity in nuclear function

XRCC2 and XRCC3 Regulate the Balance between Short- and Long-Tract Gene Conversions between Sister Chromatids▿ §

Sister chromatid recombination (SCR) is a potentially error-free pathway for the repair of DNA lesions associated with replication and is thought to be important for suppressing genomic instability. The mechanisms regulating the initiation and termination of SCR in mammalian cells are poorly understood. Previous work has implicated all the Rad51 paralogs in the initiation of gene conversion and the Rad51C/XRCC3 complex in its termination. Here, we show that hamster cells deficient in the Rad51 paralog XRCC2, a component of the Rad51B/Rad51C/Rad51D/XRCC2 complex, reveal a bias in favor of long-tract gene conversion (LTGC) during SCR. This defect is corrected by expression of wild-type XRCC2 and also by XRCC2 mutants defective in ATP binding and hydrolysis. In contrast, XRCC3-mediated homologous recombination and suppression of LTGC are dependent on ATP binding and hydrolysis. These results reveal an unexpectedly general role for Rad51 paralogs in the control of the termination of gene conversion between sister chromatids

Publisher Correction: Molecular basis of microhomology-mediated end-joining by purified full-length Polθ (Nature Communications, (2019), 10, 1, (4423), 10.1038/s41467-019-12272-9)

The original version of this Article contained errors in Figure 6. In panel o, the labels incorrectly stated ‘Poleθ’ and “Poleθ + DNA” and should be labelled “Polθ” and “Polθ + DNA”. In the result section, in the sub-section entitled “Polθ Promotes MMEJ of Long ssDNA”, the sentence “Importantly, the ability of Polθ- pol to perform MMEJ on short (≤12 nt) ssDNA (Fig. 1p, left; Supplementary Fig. 3D and 3E), and short (≤15 nt) overhangs, demonstrates it performs interstrand pairing without Polθ-hel”. should read as follow: “Importantly, the ability of Polθ-pol to perform MMEJ on short (≤12 nt) ssDNA (Fig. 1p, left; Supplementary Fig. 3D and 3E), and short (≤15 nt) overhangs, demonstrates that it performs interstrand pairing without Polθ-hel”. In the sub-section entitled “Preventing Intrastrand Pairing Stimulates MMEJ by Polθ-Pol”, the sentence “We predicted that preventing base-pairing opportunities between 3' terminal bases and bases upstream along long the 5' region of long ssDNA substrates would suppress intrastrand pairing and enable interstrand pairing by Polθ-pol (Fig. 3c)”. should read as follows: “We predicted that preventing base-pairing opportunities between 3' terminal bases and bases upstream along the 5' region of long ssDNA substrates would suppress intrastrand pairing and enable interstrand pairing by Polθ-pol (Fig. 3c)”. In the method section, in the “Proteins” sub-section the sentence “Polθ-pol, Polθ-hel and RPA were purified as described”. should read as follows: “Polθ-pol and Polθ-hel were purified as described”. These corrections have now been included in the HTML and pdf of the article. Additionally, a technical problem during the publication process resulted in loss of image quality in Figs. 1, 3 and 4. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article