15 research outputs found
EpsteināBarr virus LMP1 oncogene polymorphism in tatar and slavic populations in Russian Federation impacting on some malignant tumours
Objective: To compare genetic structure of the main EpsteināBarr virus (EBV) oncogene, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), in EBV strains circulating in two genetically distinct ethnic populations in Russian Federation, Tatars and Slavs, as well as assess an impact of diverse LMP1 variants on incidence and mortality rate for some malignant tumors partially associated with EBV infection. Materials and methods. Oral washing samples were collected from 60 ethnic Kazan Tatars and 65 ethnic Moscow Slavics. Carboxy-terminal nucleotide sequences (41 and 40 sequences, respectively) derived from hypervariable LMP1 gene region were amplified from EBV DNA samples. Next, final nucleotide sequences were translated into amino acid sequences and analyzed according to classification by Edwards et al. Results. Analysis of 41 and 40 LMP1 samples obtained from ethnic Kasan Tatars and ethnic Moscow Slavics, respectively, revealed significant difference in relevant amino acid structures. In particular, all LMP1 samples derived from Moscow Slavics were found to belong to the four protein variants: B95.8/A, Medā, China1 and NC. Among them, low-transforming variant B95.8/A was dominant (82.5%). In contrast, solely 21 out of 41 LMP1 samples derived from ethnic Tatars were classified as B95.8/A, Medā and China1 variants. Importantly, the percentage of low-transforming B95.8/A variant among ethnic Tatar samples was significantly lower compared to that one found in Moscow Slavics (29.3% vs. 82.5%). On the other hand, seven (17.1%) out of 20 other samples formed a unique protein mono group characterized by LMP1 amino acid sequence differed from that one available in the GenBank database. Such group of variants was designated as LMP1-TatK. The remaining 13 samples (31.7%) did not match either protein variants, thereby forming the ābeyond classificationā (LMP1-TatBC) group. Conclusion. The data obtained suggest that various LMP1 variants exist in EBV strains persisting in ethnic Tatrs and ethnic Slavics examined in Russian Federation. It was also found that EBV strains isolated from ethnic Tatars contained a unique LMP1 gene variant encoding protein LMP1-TatK lacked in EBV strains derived from ethnic Moscow Slavics. Taking into account the genealogy of Tatars, it cannot be ruled out that EBV strain bearing LMP1-TatK variant represented ethnically specific EBV strain that might circulate many centuries ago among their historical human predecessors called Mongol-Tatar tribes. In addition, it was shown that the LMP1 variants in EBV strains isolated from ethnic Kazan Tatars and ethnic Moscow Slavics did not affect the incidence and mortality of different forms of cancer consisting of EBV-associated cases
ŠŠøŃŃŃ ŠŠæŃŃŠµŠ¹Š½Š°āŠŠ°ŃŃ Ń ŃŃŠ½ŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠøŃ ŃŠ°ŃŠ°Ń: ŠøŠ½ŃŠøŃŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Š¾ŃŃŃ Šø ŃŠøŠŗŠ²ŠµŠ½ŃŠ½ŃŠµ Š²Š°ŃŠøŠ°Š½ŃŃ Š¾Š½ŠŗŠ¾Š³ŠµŠ½Š° LMP1
Objective of the investigation was to study the infection of ethnic Tatars with the EpsteināBarr virus (EBV) and to analyze the genetic structure of the oncogene of the virus, the latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), in the virus strains of Tatar origin. Materials and methods. The materials for the study were samples of boucle flushes of 60 students from the Kazan State Medical University who are ethnic Tatars (Tatars no less than in the 3rd generation). Amplified from DNA of boucle flushes the nucleotide sequences of the LMP1 samples translated into DNA amino acid sequences, have undergone classification based on the well-known and widely used in literature the R.H. Edwards et al. classification. Results. The analysis of nucleotide and deductive amino acid sequences of the 41 LMP1 amplicons revealed their homology with only three gene variants from the R.H. Edwards et al. classification (1999): 95.8/A (29.3 %; 12/41), Medā (14.6 %; 6/41) and China1 (7.3 %, 3/41).Ā Such variants of LMP1 as Alaskan, Med+, ChinŠ°2, China3 and NC, were not found. Among the LMP1 samples of Tatar origin in 20 cases (48.8 %), the composition of the mutations found did not allow them to be assigned to any of the oncogene variants listed above. Out of this number, in 7 (17.1 %) cases a mono group of LMP1 samples was found, differing not only from representatives of the Slavs, inhabitants of the European part of Russia, but also from other Kazan samples, and was designated as LMP1-TatK. The remaining 13 samples of LMP1 (31.7 %), not belonging to any of the known classifications, formed the group designated by us as an LMP1 group beside the classification (LMP1BC). Conclusion. Continuation of the study of the molecular-biological and functional properties of LMP1 in TatK and BC groups, which constitute 48.8 % of the number of gene samples studied, and an analysis of the peculiarities of the ethnic Tatar genotype, will probably help to clarify whether certain EBV strains influence morbidity and mortality in Tatar population with malignant neoplasms, which include EBVassociated cases.Š¦ŠµŠ»Ń ŠøŃŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½ŠøŃ ā ŠøŠ·ŃŃŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ ŠøŠ½ŃŠøŃŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Š¾ŃŃŠø Š²ŠøŃŃŃŠ¾Š¼ ŠŠæŃŃŠµŠ¹Š½Š°āŠŠ°ŃŃ (ŠŠŠ) ŃŃŠ½ŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠøŃ
ŃŠ°ŃŠ°Ń Šø Š°Š½Š°Š»ŠøŠ· Š³ŠµŠ½ŠµŃŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠ¾Š¹ ŃŃŃŃŠŗŃŃŃŃ Š¾Š½ŠŗŠ¾Š³ŠµŠ½Š° Š²ŠøŃŃŃŠ°, Š»Š°ŃŠµŠ½ŃŠ½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š¼ŠµŠ¼Š±ŃŠ°Š½Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š±ŠµŠ»ŠŗŠ° 1 (LMP1), Š² ŃŃŠ°Š¼Š¼Š°Ń
Š²ŠøŃŃŃŠ° ŃŠ°ŃŠ°ŃŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ ŠæŃŠ¾ŠøŃŃ
Š¾Š¶Š“ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ. ŠŠ°ŃŠµŃŠøŠ°Š»Ń Šø Š¼ŠµŃŠ¾Š“Ń. ŠŠ°ŃŠµŃŠøŠ°Š»Š¾Š¼ Š“Š»Ń ŠøŃŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½ŠøŃ ŃŠ»ŃŠ¶ŠøŠ»Šø Š±ŃŠŗŠŗŠ°Š»ŃŠ½ŃŠµ ŃŠ¼ŃŠ²Ń 60 ŃŃŃŠ“ŠµŠ½ŃŠ¾Š² ŠŠ°Š·Š°Š½ŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ Š³Š¾ŃŃŠ“Š°ŃŃŃŠ²ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š¼ŠµŠ“ŠøŃŠøŠ½ŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ ŃŠ½ŠøŠ²ŠµŃŃŠøŃŠµŃŠ°, ŃŠ²Š»ŃŃŃŠøŃ
ŃŃ ŃŃŠ½ŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠøŠ¼Šø ŃŠ°ŃŠ°ŃŠ°Š¼Šø (Š½Šµ Š¼ŠµŠ½ŠµŠµ ŃŠµŠ¼ Š² III ŠæŠ¾ŠŗŠ¾Š»ŠµŠ½ŠøŠø). ŠŃŠ“ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½Š½ŃŃ ŠøŠ· ŃŠ¼ŃŠ²Š¾Š² ŠŠŠ ŠøŃŠæŠ¾Š»ŃŠ·Š¾Š²Š°Š»Šø Š“Š»Ń Š°Š¼ŠæŠ»ŠøŃŠøŠŗŠ°ŃŠø LMP1. ŠŠ¼ŠæŠ»ŠøŃŠøŃŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŠµ ŠøŠ· ŠŠŠ Š±ŃŠŗŠŗŠ°Š»ŃŠ½ŃŃ
ŃŠ¼ŃŠ²Š¾Š² Š½ŃŠŗŠ»ŠµŠ¾ŃŠøŠ“Š½ŃŠµ ŠæŠ¾ŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°ŃŠµŠ»ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŃŠø Š¾Š±ŃŠ°Š·ŃŠ¾Š² LMP1, ŃŃŠ°Š½ŃŠ»ŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŠµ Š² Š°Š¼ŠøŠ½Š¾ŠŗŠøŃŠ»Š¾ŃŠ½ŃŠµ ŠæŠ¾ŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°ŃŠµŠ»ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŃŠø, ŠæŠ¾Š“Š²ŠµŃŠ³Š»ŠøŃŃ ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠøŃŠøŠŗŠ°ŃŠøŠø Š½Š° Š¾ŃŠ½Š¾Š²Š°Š½ŠøŠø ŠøŠ·Š²ŠµŃŃŠ½Š¾Š¹ Šø ŃŠøŃŠ¾ŠŗŠ¾ ŠøŃŠæŠ¾Š»ŃŠ·ŃŠµŠ¼Š¾Š¹ Š² Š»ŠøŃŠµŃŠ°ŃŃŃŠµ ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠøŃŠøŠŗŠ°ŃŠøŠø R.H. Edwards Šø ŃŠ¾Š°Š²Ń. Š ŠµŠ·ŃŠ»ŃŃŠ°ŃŃ. ŠŠ½Š°Š»ŠøŠ· Š½ŃŠŗŠ»ŠµŠ¾ŃŠøŠ“Š½ŃŃ
Šø ŃŃŠ°Š½ŃŠ»ŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŃ
Š°Š¼ŠøŠ½Š¾ŠŗŠøŃŠ»Š¾ŃŠ½ŃŃ
ŠæŠ¾ŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°ŃŠµŠ»ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŃŠµŠ¹ 41-Š³Š¾ Š°Š¼ŠæŠ»ŠøŠŗŠ¾Š½Š° LMP1 Š²ŃŃŠ²ŠøŠ» ŠøŃ
Š³Š¾Š¼Š¾Š»Š¾Š³ŠøŃ ŃŠ¾Š»ŃŠŗŠ¾ Ń 3 Š²Š°ŃŠøŠ°Š½ŃŠ°Š¼Šø Š³ŠµŠ½Š° ŠøŠ· ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠøŃŠøŠŗŠ°ŃŠøŠø R.H. Edwards Šø ŃŠ¾Š°Š²Ń.: 95.8/Š (29,3 %; 12/41), Medā (14,6 %; 6/41) Šø China1 (7,3 %; 3/41). Š¢Š°ŠŗŠøŠµ Š²Š°ŃŠøŠ°Š½ŃŃ LMP1, ŠŗŠ°Šŗ Alaskan, Med+, ChinŠ°2, China3 Šø NC, Š½Šµ Š¾Š±Š½Š°ŃŃŠ¶ŠµŠ½Ń. Š Š¾ŃŃŠ°Š»ŃŠ½ŃŃ
20 ŃŠ»ŃŃŠ°ŃŃ
(48,8 %) ŃŠæŠµŠŗŃŃ Š¾Š±Š½Š°ŃŃŠ¶ŠµŠ½Š½ŃŃ
Š¼ŃŃŠ°ŃŠøŠ¹ Š² Š¾Š±ŃŠ°Š·ŃŠ°Ń
LMP1 ŃŠ°ŃŠ°ŃŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ ŠæŃŠ¾ŠøŃŃ
Š¾Š¶Š“ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ Š½Šµ ŠæŠ¾Š·Š²Š¾Š»ŠøŠ» ŠøŃ
Š¾ŃŠ½ŠµŃŃŠø Š½Šø Šŗ Š¾Š“Š½Š¾Š¼Ń ŠøŠ· ŠæŠµŃŠµŃŠøŃŠ»ŠµŠ½Š½ŃŃ
Š²ŃŃŠµ Š²Š°ŃŠøŠ°Š½ŃŠ¾Š² Š¾Š½ŠŗŠ¾Š³ŠµŠ½Š°. ŠŠ· Š½ŠøŃ
Š² 7 ŃŠ»ŃŃŠ°ŃŃ
(17,1 % Š²ŃŠµŃ
ŠøŃŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŃ
Š¾Š±ŃŠ°Š·ŃŠ¾Š²) Š¾Š±Š½Š°ŃŃŠ¶ŠµŠ½Š° Š¼Š¾Š½Š¾Š³ŃŃŠæŠæŠ° Š²Š°ŃŠøŠ°Š½ŃŠ¾Š² LMP1, Š¾ŃŠ»ŠøŃŠ°ŃŃŠ°ŃŃŃ Š½Šµ ŃŠ¾Š»ŃŠŗŠ¾ Š¾Ń ŠæŃŠµŠ“ŃŃŠ°Š²ŠøŃŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ ŃŠ»Š°Š²ŃŠ½, Š¶ŠøŃŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ ŠµŠ²ŃŠ¾ŠæŠµŠ¹ŃŠŗŠ¾Š¹ ŃŠ°ŃŃŠø Š Š¾ŃŃŠøŠø, Š½Š¾ Šø Š¾Ń Š“ŃŃŠ³ŠøŃ
ŠŗŠ°Š·Š°Š½ŃŠŗŠøŃ
Š¾Š±ŃŠ°Š·ŃŠ¾Š², Šø Š¾Š±Š¾Š·Š½Š°ŃŠµŠ½Š½Š°Ń Š½Š°Š¼Šø, ŠŗŠ°Šŗ LMP1-TatK. ŠŃŃŠ°Š»ŃŠ½ŃŠµ 13 Š¾Š±ŃŠ°Š·ŃŠ¾Š² LMP1 (31,7 %), Š½Šµ Š¾ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŃŃŠøŃ
ŃŃ Š½Šø Šŗ Š¾Š“Š½Š¾Š¹ ŠøŠ· ŠøŠ·Š²ŠµŃŃŠ½ŃŃ
ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠøŃŠøŠŗŠ°ŃŠøŠ¹, ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠ¼ŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š»Šø Š³ŃŃŠæŠæŃ, Š¾Š±Š¾Š·Š½Š°ŃŠµŠ½Š½ŃŃ Š½Š°Š¼Šø, ŠŗŠ°Šŗ Š³ŃŃŠæŠæŠ° LMP1 Š²Š½Šµ ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠøŃŠøŠŗŠ°ŃŠøŠø (LMP1ŠŠ). ŠŠ°ŠŗŠ»ŃŃŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ. ŠŠ°Š»ŃŠ½ŠµŠ¹ŃŠµŠµ ŠøŠ·ŃŃŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ Š¼Š¾Š»ŠµŠŗŃŠ»ŃŃŠ½Š¾-Š±ŠøŠ¾Š»Š¾Š³ŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠøŃ
Šø ŃŃŠ½ŠŗŃŠøŠ¾Š½Š°Š»ŃŠ½ŃŃ
ŃŠ²Š¾Š¹ŃŃŠ² LMP1 Š² Š³ŃŃŠæŠæŠ°Ń
ŠŠ Šø TatK, ŃŠ¾ŃŃŠ°Š²Š»ŃŃŃŠøŃ
48,8 % Š¾Ń ŃŠøŃŠ»Š° ŠøŠ·ŃŃŠµŠ½Š½ŃŃ
Š¾Š±ŃŠ°Š·ŃŠ¾Š² Š¾Š½ŠŗŠ¾Š±ŠµŠ»ŠŗŠ°, Šø Š°Š½Š°Š»ŠøŠ· Š¾ŃŠ¾Š±ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾ŃŃŠµŠ¹ Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾ŃŠøŠæŠ° ŃŃŠ½ŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠøŃ
ŃŠ°ŃŠ°Ń, Š²ŠµŃŠ¾ŃŃŠ½Š¾, ŠæŠ¾Š·Š²Š¾Š»ŃŃ Š²ŃŃŃŠ½ŠøŃŃ, Š¾ŠŗŠ°Š·ŃŠ²Š°ŃŃ Š»Šø Š¾ŠæŃŠµŠ“ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½Š½ŃŠµ ŃŃŠ°Š¼Š¼Ń ŠŠŠ Š²Š»ŠøŃŠ½ŠøŠµ Š½Š° ŠæŠ¾ŠŗŠ°Š·Š°ŃŠµŠ»Šø Š·Š°Š±Š¾Š»ŠµŠ²Š°ŠµŠ¼Š¾ŃŃŠø Šø ŃŠ¼ŠµŃŃŠ½Š¾ŃŃŠø Š·Š»Š¾ŠŗŠ°ŃŠµŃŃŠ²ŠµŠ½Š½ŃŠ¼Šø Š½Š¾Š²Š¾Š¾Š±ŃŠ°Š·Š¾Š²Š°Š½ŠøŃŠ¼Šø, Š² ŃŠ¾ŃŃŠ°Š² ŠŗŠ¾ŃŠ¾ŃŃŃ
Š²Ń
Š¾Š“ŃŃ ŠŠŠ-Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŠµ ŃŠ»ŃŃŠ°Šø, Ń ŃŠ°ŃŠ°ŃŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ Š½Š°ŃŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ
Š Š°ŃŠæŃŠµŠ“ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² HLA II Ń Š±Š¾Š»ŃŠ½ŃŃ ŃŠ°ŠŗŠ¾Š¼ Š½Š¾ŃŠ¾Š³Š»Š¾ŃŠŗŠø, Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŠ¼ Ń Š²ŠøŃŃŃŠ¾Š¼ ŠŠæŃŃŠµŠ¹Š½Š°āŠŠ°ŃŃ, Šø Š“ŃŃŠ³ŠøŠ¼Šø Š¾ŠæŃŃ Š¾Š»ŃŠ¼Šø ŃŠ¾ŃŠ¾Š²Š¾Š¹ ŠæŠ¾Š»Š¾ŃŃŠø Š² Š Š¾ŃŃŠøŠø
Background. It has been proved that for the nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) the etiological agent is the EpsteināBarr virus (EBV). Being an ubiquitous infection, EBV, under certain conditions, is able to display its oncogenic potential. Among a wide range of tumors associated with EBV, the NPC occupies a special place because it is characterized by a geographically and ethnically heterogeneous distribution, suggesting that in the pathogenesis of NPC, in addition to EBV, an important role is played by other factors, such as genetic predisposition to this neoplasm. Among known genetic factors influencing the frequency of NPC development, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex occupies an important place, as it plays a central role in the presentation of viral antigens to the immune system. In Russia, the association of HLA alleles with the risk of EBV associated forms of NPC development and with development of other oral cavity tumors (OOCT), not associated with the virus, has not been studied. In the literature there are contradictory information about HLA genes, which determine the predisposition to the emergence of these tumors, and their role in the initiation and formation an immune response to EBV proteins.Objective: to study the distribution of the of DQA1-, DQB1-, DRB1-HLA class II gene variants associated with respectively the risk or resistance to the development of NPC and OOCT and with a high and low level of antibody response to EBV main proteins. A group of healthy persons served as a control.Materials and methods. Blood samples from 62 patients with NPC, 44 patients with OOCT, and as control, 300 healthy individuals, were used in the study. The blood serum samples of NPC and OOCT patients were tested for the presence of immunoglobulin classes G and A antibodies to capsid and early EBV antigens by indirect immunofluorescence. All serum samples of patients and healthy individuals were genotyped on HLA-DQA1, -DQB1 and -DRB1 by the method of multi-primer amplification by sequence-specific primers by real-time polymerase chain reaction.Results. In NPC patients, an increase in the frequency of HLA-DRB1*08 was found when compared with the frequency of a similar allele in healthy individuals (5.6 % vs 1.8 %; odds ratio (OR) 3.2; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.1ā9.1; p = 0.02), and, on the contrary, a lower HLA-DQB1*0301 frequency was detected (16.1 % vs 25.3 %; p <0.05) than in healthy individuals. The data obtained suggest that the HLA-DRB1*08 gene is associated with an increased sensitivity to NPC.In OOCT patients, HLA-DQB1*0502ā4 and HLA-DRB1*16 variants were less common than in healthy individuals (1.1 % vs 6.8 %; p <0.05 and 1.1 % vs 6.7 %; OR 0.16; 95 % CI 0.01ā1.08; p <0.05, respectively), suggesting that the HLA-DQB1*0301 gene is associated with resistance to NPC, and HLA-DQB1*0502ā4 and HLA-DRB1*16 variants ā with resistance to OOCT. It is interesting to note the difference in the frequency of HLA-DRB1*13 between NPC and OOCT patients (17.7 % vs 6.8 %; OR 2.9; 95 %CI 1.1ā8.6; p <0.05). One can suggest that this difference is related to the proven involvement of EBV in the NPC development. There were no other differences in the frequencies of class II HLA genes between the groups of NPC and OOCT patients. For the first time in Russia the importance of alleles DQA1, DQB1 and DRB1 of the HLA gene for the NPC and OOCT development, malignant tumors, respectively associated and non-associated with EBV, was studied. The results of the investigation completed together with known literature data allow us to conclude that the above alleles of the HLA class II gene can serve as a factor predisposing to the development of NPC in Russia.Conclusion. However, in order to establish a strict association between a specific HLA haplotype and the NPC and OOCT incidence, the information obtained is insufficient due to the complexity and variability of the genetic control of immune responses controlling the tumor process. A comprehensive study of this issue using different immune response genes and populations of different ethnic origins will probably help to elucidate the effect of genetic polymorphism on the risk of NPC and OOCT development in Russia.ŠŠ²ŠµŠ“ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ. ŠŠ°Š·Š¾ŃŠ°ŃŠøŠ½Š³ŠµŠ°Š»ŃŠ½Š°Ń ŠŗŠ°ŃŃŠøŠ½Š¾Š¼Š° (ŃŠ°Šŗ Š½Š¾ŃŠ¾Š³Š»Š¾ŃŠŗŠø, Š ŠŠ), ŠŗŠ°Šŗ ŠøŠ·Š²ŠµŃŃŠ½Š¾, ŃŃŃŠ¾Š³Š¾ Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š° Ń Š²ŠøŃŃŃŠ¾Š¼ ŠŠæŃŃŠµŠ¹Š½Š°āŠŠ°ŃŃ (ŠŠŠ). ŠŠ“Š½Š°ŠŗŠ¾ ŠŠŠ ŃŠ²Š»ŃŠµŃŃŃ ŃŠ±ŠøŠŗŠ²ŠøŃŠ°ŃŠ½Š¾Š¹ ŠøŠ½ŃŠµŠŗŃŠøŠµŠ¹, ŃŠ¾Š³Š“Š° ŠŗŠ°Šŗ Š ŠŠ ŃŠ°Š·Š²ŠøŠ²Š°ŠµŃŃŃ Š“Š¾Š²Š¾Š»ŃŠ½Š¾ ŃŠµŠ“ŠŗŠ¾ Šø Ń
Š°ŃŠ°ŠŗŃŠµŃŠøŠ·ŃŠµŃŃŃ Š³ŠµŠ¾Š³ŃŠ°ŃŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠø Šø ŃŃŠ½ŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠø Š½ŠµŠ¾Š“Š½Š¾ŃŠ¾Š“Š½ŃŠ¼ ŃŠ°ŃŠæŃŠ¾ŃŃŃŠ°Š½ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµŠ¼, ŃŃŠ¾ ŠæŠ¾Š·Š²Š¾Š»ŃŠµŃ ŠæŃŠµŠ“ŠæŠ¾Š»Š¾Š¶ŠøŃŃ Š²Š°Š¶Š½ŃŃ ŃŠ¾Š»Ń Š“ŃŃŠ³ŠøŃ
ŠŗŠ¾ŃŠ°ŠŗŃŠ¾ŃŠ¾Š² Š² ŠæŠ°ŃŠ¾Š³ŠµŠ½ŠµŠ·Šµ Š ŠŠ, ŃŠ°ŠŗŠøŃ
ŠŗŠ°Šŗ Š¾ŠŗŃŃŠ¶Š°ŃŃŠ°Ń ŃŃŠµŠ“Š° Šø Š³ŠµŠ½ŠµŃŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠ°Ń ŠæŃŠµŠ“ŃŠ°ŃŠæŠ¾Š»Š¾Š¶ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾ŃŃŃ. Š”ŃŠµŠ“Šø ŠøŠ·Š²ŠµŃŃŠ½ŃŃ
Š³ŠµŠ½ŠµŃŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠøŃ
ŃŠ°ŠŗŃŠ¾ŃŠ¾Š², Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŃ
Ń Š ŠŠ, Š³Š»Š°Š²Š½ŃŠ¹ ŠŗŠ¾Š¼ŠæŠ»ŠµŠŗŃ Š³ŠøŃŃŠ¾ŃŠ¾Š²Š¼ŠµŃŃŠøŠ¼Š¾ŃŃŠø (Š»ŠµŠ¹ŠŗŠ¾ŃŠøŃŠ°ŃŠ½ŃŠ¹ Š°Š½ŃŠøŠ³ŠµŠ½ ŃŠµŠ»Š¾Š²ŠµŠŗŠ°, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)) Š·Š°Š½ŠøŠ¼Š°ŠµŃ Š²Š°Š¶Š½Š¾Šµ ŠæŠ¾Š»Š¾Š¶ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ, ŃŠ°Šŗ ŠŗŠ°Šŗ ŠøŠ³ŃŠ°ŠµŃ ŠŗŠ»ŃŃŠµŠ²ŃŃ ŃŠ¾Š»Ń Š² ŠæŃŠµŠ·ŠµŠ½ŃŠ°ŃŠøŠø Š²ŠøŃŃŃŠ½ŃŃ
Š°Š½ŃŠøŠ³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃŠ½Š½Š¾Š¹ ŃŠøŃŃŠµŠ¼Ń. Š Š Š¾ŃŃŠøŠø ŠøŠ·ŃŃŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠ°ŃŠøŠø Š°Š»Š»ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ HLA Ń ŃŠøŃŠŗŠ¾Š¼ ŃŠ°Š·Š²ŠøŃŠøŃ Š ŠŠ, ŃŠ²ŃŠ·Š°Š½Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ Ń ŠŠŠ, Š½Šµ ŠæŃŠ¾Š²Š¾Š“ŠøŠ»Š¾ŃŃ, Š° Š² Š»ŠøŃŠµŃŠ°ŃŃŃŠµ ŃŃŃŠµŃŃŠ²ŃŃŃ ŠæŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠ²Š¾ŃŠµŃŠøŠ²ŃŠµ ŃŠ²ŠµŠ“ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ Š¾ ŃŠ¾Š»Šø ŃŠ°Š·Š½ŃŃ
HLA-Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² ŠŗŠ°Šŗ Š² Š²Š¾Š·Š½ŠøŠŗŠ½Š¾Š²ŠµŠ½ŠøŠø Šø ŃŠ°Š·Š²ŠøŃŠøŠø Š ŠŠ, ŃŠ°Šŗ Šø Š² ŠøŠ½ŠøŃŠøŠ°ŃŠøŠø Šø Š¾ŃŠ¾Š±ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾ŃŃŃŃ
ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃŠ½Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š¾ŃŠ²ŠµŃŠ° Šŗ Š±ŠµŠ»ŠŗŠ°Š¼ ŠŠŠ.Š¦ŠµŠ»Ń ŠøŃŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½ŠøŃ ā ŠøŠ·ŃŃŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ ŃŠ°ŃŠæŃŠµŠ“ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ Š²Š°ŃŠøŠ°Š½ŃŠ¾Š² DQA1-, DQB1-, DRB1-Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² HLA ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠ° II Ń Š±Š¾Š»ŃŠ½ŃŃ
Š ŠŠ Šø ŠæŠ°ŃŠøŠµŠ½ŃŠ¾Š² Ń Š“ŃŃŠ³ŠøŠ¼Šø Š¾ŠæŃŃ
Š¾Š»ŃŠ¼Šø ŠæŠ¾Š»Š¾ŃŃŠø ŃŃŠ° (ŠŠŠŠ ), Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŠ¼Šø Šø Š½Šµ Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŠ¼Šø Ń ŠŠŠ, Š² Š³ŃŃŠæŠæŠ°Ń
Ń Š²ŃŃŠ¾ŠŗŠøŠ¼ Šø Š½ŠøŠ·ŠŗŠøŠ¼ ŃŃŠ¾Š²Š½ŠµŠ¼ Š³ŃŠ¼Š¾ŃŠ°Š»ŃŠ½Š¾Š³Š¾ ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃŠ½Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š¾ŃŠ²ŠµŃŠ° Šŗ Š¾ŃŠ½Š¾Š²Š½ŃŠ¼ Š±ŠµŠ»ŠŗŠ°Š¼ ŠŠŠ ŠæŠ¾ ŃŃŠ°Š²Š½ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ Ń ŠŗŠ¾Š½ŃŃŠ¾Š»ŃŠ½Š¾Š¹ Š³ŃŃŠæŠæŠ¾Š¹ Š·Š“Š¾ŃŠ¾Š²ŃŃ
Š»ŠøŃ.ŠŠ°ŃŠµŃŠøŠ°Š»Ń Šø Š¼ŠµŃŠ¾Š“Ń. ŠŃŠµŠ³Š¾ Š² ŠøŃŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½ŠøŠµ Š²Š¾ŃŠ»Šø 62 Š±Š¾Š»ŃŠ½ŃŃ
Š½ŠµŠ“ŠøŃŃŠµŃŠµŠ½ŃŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŠ¼ Š ŠŠ Šø 44 ŠæŠ°ŃŠøŠµŠ½ŃŠ° Ń ŠŠŠŠ , Š° ŃŠ°ŠŗŠ¶Šµ 300 Š·Š“Š¾ŃŠ¾Š²ŃŃ
Š»ŠøŃ. Š”ŃŠ²Š¾ŃŠ¾ŃŠŗŠ° ŠŗŃŠ¾Š²Šø Š²ŃŠµŃ
Š±Š¾Š»ŃŠ½ŃŃ
Š±ŃŠ»Š° ŠæŃŠ¾ŃŠµŃŃŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š° Š½Š° Š½Š°Š»ŠøŃŠøŠµ Š°Š½ŃŠøŃŠµŠ» ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃŠ½Š¾Š³Š»Š¾Š±ŃŠ»ŠøŠ½Š¾Š² ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠ¾Š² G Šø Š Šŗ ŠŗŠ°ŠæŃŠøŠ“Š½Š¾Š¼Ń Šø ŃŠ°Š½Š½ŠµŠ¼Ń Š°Š½ŃŠøŠ³ŠµŠ½Š°Š¼ ŠŠŠ Š¼ŠµŃŠ¾Š“Š¾Š¼ Š½ŠµŠæŃŃŠ¼Š¾Š¹ ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŠ»ŃŠ¾ŃŠµŃŃŠµŠ½ŃŠøŠø. ŠŃŠµ Š¾Š±ŃŠ°Š·ŃŃ Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾ŃŠøŠæŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Ń Š½Š° HLA-DQA1, -DQB1 Šø -DRB1 Ń ŠæŠ¾Š¼Š¾ŃŃŃ Š¼ŃŠ»ŃŃŠøŠæŃŠ°Š¹Š¼ŠµŃŠ½Š¾Š¹ Š°Š¼ŠæŠ»ŠøŃŠøŠŗŠ°ŃŠøŠø ŃŠøŠŗŠ²ŠµŠ½Ń-ŃŠæŠµŃŠøŃŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠøŠ¼Šø ŠæŃŠ°Š¹Š¼ŠµŃŠ°Š¼Šø Š¼ŠµŃŠ¾Š“Š¾Š¼ ŠæŠ¾Š»ŠøŠ¼ŠµŃŠ°Š·Š½Š¾Š¹ ŃŠµŠæŠ½Š¾Š¹ ŃŠµŠ°ŠŗŃŠøŠø Š² ŃŠµŠ¶ŠøŠ¼Šµ ŃŠµŠ°Š»ŃŠ½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š²ŃŠµŠ¼ŠµŠ½Šø.Š ŠµŠ·ŃŠ»ŃŃŠ°ŃŃ. ŠŠ¾ŠŗŠ°Š·Š°Š½Š¾ ŃŠ²ŠµŠ»ŠøŃŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ ŃŠ°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŃ HLA-DRB1*08 Ń ŠæŠ°ŃŠøŠµŠ½ŃŠ¾Š² Ń Š ŠŠ ŠæŠ¾ ŃŃŠ°Š²Š½ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ Ń ŠŗŠ¾Š½ŃŃŠ¾Š»ŠµŠ¼ (5,6 % ŠæŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠ² 1,8 %; Š¾ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ ŃŠ°Š½ŃŠ¾Š² (ŠŠØ) 3,2; 95 % Š“Š¾Š²ŠµŃŠøŃŠµŠ»ŃŠ½ŃŠ¹ ŠøŠ½ŃŠµŃŠ²Š°Š» (ŠŠ) 1,1ā9,1; Ń = 0,02). ŠŠ¾Š·Š¼Š¾Š¶Š½Š¾, Š³ŠµŠ½ HLA-DRB1*08 Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½ Ń ŠæŠ¾Š²ŃŃŠµŠ½Š½Š¾Š¹ ŃŃŠ²ŃŃŠ²ŠøŃŠµŠ»ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŃŃŃ Šŗ Š ŠŠ. Š ŃŠ¾ Š¶Šµ Š²ŃŠµŠ¼Ń Ń ŠæŠ°ŃŠøŠµŠ½ŃŠ¾Š² Ń Š ŠŠ Š±ŃŠ»Š° Š²ŃŃŠ²Š»ŠµŠ½Š° Š±Š¾Š»ŠµŠµ Š½ŠøŠ·ŠŗŠ°Ń, ŃŠµŠ¼ Š² ŠŗŠ¾Š½ŃŃŠ¾Š»Šµ, ŃŠ°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠ° HLA-DQB1*0301 (16,1 % ŠæŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠ² 25,3 %; Ń <0,05). ŠŠ°ŃŠøŠ°Š½Ń HLA-DQB1*0502ā4, Š½Š°Š¾Š±Š¾ŃŠ¾Ń, ŃŠµŠ¶Šµ Š²ŃŃŃŠµŃŠ°Š»ŃŃ Ń ŠæŠ°ŃŠøŠµŠ½ŃŠ¾Š² Ń ŠŠŠŠ , ŃŠµŠ¼ Š² ŠŗŠ¾Š½ŃŃŠ¾Š»Šµ (1,1 % ŠæŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠ² 6,8 %; Ń <0,05). ŠŠ½Š°Š»Š¾Š³ŠøŃŠ½ŃŠµ Š½Š°Š±Š»ŃŠ“ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ ŠŗŠ°ŃŠ°ŃŃŃŃ HLA-DRB1*16, ŃŠ°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠ° ŠŗŠ¾ŃŠ¾ŃŠ¾Š³Š¾ Ń ŠæŠ°ŃŠøŠµŠ½ŃŠ¾Š² Ń ŠŠŠŠ Š±ŃŠ»Š° Š½ŠøŠ¶Šµ, ŃŠµŠ¼ Š² ŠŗŠ¾Š½ŃŃŠ¾Š»Šµ (1,1 % ŠæŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠ² 6,7 %; ŠŠØ 0,16; 95 % ŠŠ 0,01ā1,08; Ń <0,05), Ń. Šµ. Š³ŠµŠ½ HLA-DQB1*0301 Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½ Ń ŃŠµŠ·ŠøŃŃŠµŠ½ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŃŃŃ Šŗ Š ŠŠ, Š° Š²Š°ŃŠøŠ°Š½ŃŃ HLA-DQB1*0502ā4 Šø HLA-DRB1*16 ā Ń ŃŠµŠ·ŠøŃŃŠµŠ½ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŃŃŃ Šŗ ŠŠŠŠ .ŠŠ½ŃŠµŃŠµŃŠµŠ½ ŃŠ°ŠŗŃ Š¾Š±Š½Š°ŃŃŠ¶ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ ŃŠ°Š·Š»ŠøŃŠøŠ¹ Š² ŃŠ°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠµ HLA-DRB1*13 Ń ŠæŠ°ŃŠøŠµŠ½ŃŠ¾Š² Ń Š ŠŠ Šø ŠŠŠŠ (17,7 % ŠæŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠ² 6,8 %; ŠŠØ 2,9; 95 % ŠŠ 1,1ā8,6; Ń <0,05). ŠŃŠø ŃŠ°Š·Š»ŠøŃŠøŃ Š¼Š¾Š³ŃŃ Š±ŃŃŃ ŃŠ²ŃŠ·Š°Š½Ń Ń Š“Š¾ŠŗŠ°Š·Š°Š½Š½ŃŠ¼ ŃŃŠ°ŃŃŠøŠµŠ¼ ŠŠŠ Š² ŃŠ°Š·Š²ŠøŃŠøŠø Š ŠŠ. ŠŃŃŠ³ŠøŃ
ŃŠ°Š·Š»ŠøŃŠøŠ¹ ŠæŠ¾ ŃŠ°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠ°Š¼ Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² HLA ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠ° II Š¼ŠµŠ¶Š“Ń Š³ŃŃŠæŠæŠ°Š¼Šø ŠæŠ°ŃŠøŠµŠ½ŃŠ¾Š² Ń Š ŠŠ Šø ŠŠŠŠ Š½Šµ Š²ŃŃŠ²Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾. ŠŠæŠµŃŠ²ŃŠµ Š² Š Š¾ŃŃŠøŠø ŠæŃŠ¾Š²ŠµŠ“ŠµŠ½Š¾ ŠøŠ·ŃŃŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ ŃŠ²ŃŠ·Šø Š°Š»Š»ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ DQA1, DQB1 Šø DRB1 Š³ŠµŠ½Š° HLA Ń ŃŠ°Š·Š²ŠøŃŠøŠµŠ¼ Š½Š°Š·Š¾ŃŠ°ŃŠøŠ½Š³ŠµŠ°Š»ŃŠ½Š¾Š¹ ŠŗŠ°ŃŃŠøŠ½Š¾Š¼Ń (Š ŠŠ) Šø ŠŠŠŠ , Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŃ
Šø Š½Šµ Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠøŃŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½ŃŃ
Ń ŠŠŠ.ŠŠ°ŠŗŠ»ŃŃŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ. ŠŠ°ŃŠø ŠøŃŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½ŠøŃ Š² ŃŠ¾Š²Š¾ŠŗŃŠæŠ½Š¾ŃŃŠø Ń ŃŠ¶Šµ ŠøŠ·Š²ŠµŃŃŠ½ŃŠ¼Šø Š“Š°Š½Š½ŃŠ¼Šø ŠæŠ¾Š·Š²Š¾Š»ŃŃŃ Š·Š°ŠŗŠ»ŃŃŠøŃŃ, ŃŃŠ¾ ŠøŠ¼ŠµŠµŃŃŃ Š¾ŠæŃŠµŠ“ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½Š½Š°Ń ŃŠ²ŃŠ·Ń Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² HLA ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠ° II c ŃŠ°Š·Š²ŠøŃŠøŠµŠ¼ Š ŠŠ, Š¾Š“Š½Š°ŠŗŠ¾ Š“Š»Ń ŃŃŃŠ°Š½Š¾Š²Š»ŠµŠ½ŠøŃ ŃŃŃŠ¾Š³Š¾Š¹ Š°ŃŃŠ¾ŃŠøŠ°ŃŠøŠø Š°Š»Š»ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ HLA ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠ° II Ń Š ŠŠ Šø Š“ŃŃŠ³ŠøŠ¼Šø Š¾ŠæŃŃ
Š¾Š»ŃŠ¼Šø Š¾Š±Š»Š°ŃŃŠø Š³Š¾Š»Š¾Š²Ń Šø ŃŠµŠø ŠæŠ¾Š»ŃŃŠµŠ½Š½ŃŃ
ŃŠ²ŠµŠ“ŠµŠ½ŠøŠ¹ Š½ŠµŠ“Š¾ŃŃŠ°ŃŠ¾ŃŠ½Š¾ ŠøŠ·-Š·Š° ŃŠ»Š¾Š¶Š½Š¾ŃŃŠø Šø Š²Š°ŃŠøŠ°Š±ŠµŠ»ŃŠ½Š¾ŃŃŠø Š³ŠµŠ½ŠµŃŠøŃŠµŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ ŠŗŠ¾Š½ŃŃŠ¾Š»Ń ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃŠ½Š½ŃŃ
ŃŠµŠ°ŠŗŃŠøŠ¹, ŠŗŠ¾Š½ŃŃŠ¾Š»ŠøŃŃŃŃŠøŃ
Š¾ŠæŃŃ
Š¾Š»ŠµŠ²ŃŠ¹ ŠæŃŠ¾ŃŠµŃŃ
Epigenetic mechanisms in virus-induced tumorigenesis
About 15ā20% of human cancers worldwide have viral etiology. Emerging data clearly indicate that several human DNA and RNA viruses, such as human papillomavirus, EpsteināBarr virus, Kaposiās sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human T-cell lymphotropic virus, contribute to cancer development. Human tumor-associated viruses have evolved multiple molecular mechanisms to disrupt specific cellular pathways to facilitate aberrant replication. Although oncogenic viruses belong to different families, their strategies in human cancer development show many similarities and involve viral-encoded oncoproteins targeting the key cellular proteins that regulate cell growth. Recent studies show that virus and host interactions also occur at the epigenetic level. In this review, we summarize the published information related to the interactions between viral proteins and epigenetic machinery which lead to alterations in the epigenetic landscape of the cell contributing to carcinogenesis
P20
The EpsteināBarr virus (EBV) represents an etiological agent for a number of human benign and malignant tumors. One of the EBV encoded proteins, the latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), is involved in activation of many signaling pathways and transcription factors leading EBV infected cells to immortalization and transformation.
Itās well known that almost all worldsā population is infected with EBV. As usually, infection occurs during early childhood without serious consequences for infected people. At the same time a secondary infection by additional EBV strain(s) occurs quite often. During the in vitro cultivation of peripheral blood lymphocyte from persons infected with multiple strains of the virus, only one of them having LMP1 oncogene with highest transforming potential becomes dominant while the others are eliminated.
To figure out whether pattern of LMP1 expressions reflects the origin of EBV strains, six cell lines from patients with tumors, associated and not-associated with the virus and healthy individuals were established. The nucleotide and deductive amino acid (a.a.) sequences of LMP1 isolates tested were analyzed and compared with those of LMP1 isolates obtained from eight cell lines of African and Japanese EBV-associated Burkittās lymphomas (BL) origin.
As the result, in four out of six cell lines of Russian origin (2 from patients with lymphoid pathology and 2 from PBLs of blood donors) the low divergent LMP1 B95.8/A variant characterized by a low transforming activity and a small number of a.a. substitutions was detected. For other two cell lines originated from EBV-associated patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and not virus-associated Hodgkinās lymphoma patient the LMP1Med- and LMP1China1 variants, characterized by a larger set of mutations and high transforming potential, were found. Low divergent LMP1 variants (B95.8 or B95.8/A) were observed for 13 of 15 LMP1 samples from PBLs of Russian blood donors; in 2 donors highly divergent China1 and NC LMP1 variants were also detected. Among eight cell lines of BL origin three lines were the sources of the prototype EBV strain B95.8 (Jijoye, P3HR1, Raji). From other five cell lines (Daudi, Namalva, Ag 876, NC37 and Akata) LMP1 variants Med- and China1, characterized by a significant number of mutations and high transforming capacity were obtained.
Genetic relationship between LMP1 isolates from cell lines of Russian and BL origin were analyzed by the phylogenetic tree. It follows from the constructed tree that cell lines of Russian and BL lymphoma origin formed two separate clusters located at the tree a distance from each other, indicating genetic proximity for respective groups of cell lines. The data obtained complemented with the results of our previous studies suggest that among Russians represented by cancer patients and healthy individuals, EBV strains with predominantly low transforming capacity of LMP1 are persisting. These findings are likely can explain the non-endemic nature of the EBV-associated pathologies in Russia.On the other hand, one can speculate that in African countries which are endemic for BL highly oncogenic strains of EBV are dominated, the indirect confirmation of what is the detection in cell lines of BL origin LMP1 isolates having high transforming activity. The results of this study let us also to suggest that LMP1 expression pattern in non-endemic region like Russia does not reflect the type of malignancy but rather reflect their geographic origin
HLA II genes distribution in EpsteināBarr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma and other tumors of the oral cavity patients in Russia
Background. It has been proved that for the nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) the etiological agent is the EpsteināBarr virus (EBV). Being an ubiquitous infection, EBV, under certain conditions, is able to display its oncogenic potential. Among a wide range of tumors associated with EBV, the NPC occupies a special place because it is characterized by a geographically and ethnically heterogeneous distribution, suggesting that in the pathogenesis of NPC, in addition to EBV, an important role is played by other factors, such as genetic predisposition to this neoplasm. Among known genetic factors influencing the frequency of NPC development, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex occupies an important place, as it plays a central role in the presentation of viral antigens to the immune system. In Russia, the association of HLA alleles with the risk of EBV associated forms of NPC development and with development of other oral cavity tumors (OOCT), not associated with the virus, has not been studied. In the literature there are contradictory information about HLA genes, which determine the predisposition to the emergence of these tumors, and their role in the initiation and formation an immune response to EBV proteins.Objective: to study the distribution of the of DQA1-, DQB1-, DRB1-HLA class II gene variants associated with respectively the risk or resistance to the development of NPC and OOCT and with a high and low level of antibody response to EBV main proteins. A group of healthy persons served as a control.Materials and methods. Blood samples from 62 patients with NPC, 44 patients with OOCT, and as control, 300 healthy individuals, were used in the study. The blood serum samples of NPC and OOCT patients were tested for the presence of immunoglobulin classes G and A antibodies to capsid and early EBV antigens by indirect immunofluorescence. All serum samples of patients and healthy individuals were genotyped on HLA-DQA1, -DQB1 and -DRB1 by the method of multi-primer amplification by sequence-specific primers by real-time polymerase chain reaction.Results. In NPC patients, an increase in the frequency of HLA-DRB1*08 was found when compared with the frequency of a similar allele in healthy individuals (5.6 % vs 1.8 %; odds ratio (OR) 3.2; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.1ā9.1; p = 0.02), and, on the contrary, a lower HLA-DQB1*0301 frequency was detected (16.1 % vs 25.3 %; p <0.05) than in healthy individuals. The data obtained suggest that the HLA-DRB1*08 gene is associated with an increased sensitivity to NPC.In OOCT patients, HLA-DQB1*0502ā4 and HLA-DRB1*16 variants were less common than in healthy individuals (1.1 % vs 6.8 %; p <0.05 and 1.1 % vs 6.7 %; OR 0.16; 95 % CI 0.01ā1.08; p <0.05, respectively), suggesting that the HLA-DQB1*0301 gene is associated with resistance to NPC, and HLA-DQB1*0502ā4 and HLA-DRB1*16 variants ā with resistance to OOCT. It is interesting to note the difference in the frequency of HLA-DRB1*13 between NPC and OOCT patients (17.7 % vs 6.8 %; OR 2.9; 95 %CI 1.1ā8.6; p <0.05). One can suggest that this difference is related to the proven involvement of EBV in the NPC development. There were no other differences in the frequencies of class II HLA genes between the groups of NPC and OOCT patients. For the first time in Russia the importance of alleles DQA1, DQB1 and DRB1 of the HLA gene for the NPC and OOCT development, malignant tumors, respectively associated and non-associated with EBV, was studied. The results of the investigation completed together with known literature data allow us to conclude that the above alleles of the HLA class II gene can serve as a factor predisposing to the development of NPC in Russia.Conclusion. However, in order to establish a strict association between a specific HLA haplotype and the NPC and OOCT incidence, the information obtained is insufficient due to the complexity and variability of the genetic control of immune responses controlling the tumor process. A comprehensive study of this issue using different immune response genes and populations of different ethnic origins will probably help to elucidate the effect of genetic polymorphism on the risk of NPC and OOCT development in Russia
EpsteināBarr virus in the ethnic Tatars population: the infection and sequence variants of LMP1 oncogene
Objective of the investigation was to study the infection of ethnic Tatars with the EpsteināBarr virus (EBV) and to analyze the genetic structure of the oncogene of the virus, the latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), in the virus strains of Tatar origin. Materials and methods. The materials for the study were samples of boucle flushes of 60 students from the Kazan State Medical University who are ethnic Tatars (Tatars no less than in the 3rd generation). Amplified from DNA of boucle flushes the nucleotide sequences of the LMP1 samples translated into DNA amino acid sequences, have undergone classification based on the well-known and widely used in literature the R.H. Edwards et al. classification. Results. The analysis of nucleotide and deductive amino acid sequences of the 41 LMP1 amplicons revealed their homology with only three gene variants from the R.H. Edwards et al. classification (1999): 95.8/A (29.3 %; 12/41), Medā (14.6 %; 6/41) and China1 (7.3 %, 3/41).Ā Such variants of LMP1 as Alaskan, Med+, ChinŠ°2, China3 and NC, were not found. Among the LMP1 samples of Tatar origin in 20 cases (48.8 %), the composition of the mutations found did not allow them to be assigned to any of the oncogene variants listed above. Out of this number, in 7 (17.1 %) cases a mono group of LMP1 samples was found, differing not only from representatives of the Slavs, inhabitants of the European part of Russia, but also from other Kazan samples, and was designated as LMP1-TatK. The remaining 13 samples of LMP1 (31.7 %), not belonging to any of the known classifications, formed the group designated by us as an LMP1 group beside the classification (LMP1BC). Conclusion. Continuation of the study of the molecular-biological and functional properties of LMP1 in TatK and BC groups, which constitute 48.8 % of the number of gene samples studied, and an analysis of the peculiarities of the ethnic Tatar genotype, will probably help to clarify whether certain EBV strains influence morbidity and mortality in Tatar population with malignant neoplasms, which include EBVassociated cases
The NP9 protein encoded by the human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K(HML-2) negatively regulates gene activation of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2).
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human tumour virus that efficiently growth-transforms primary human B-lymphocytes in vitro. The viral nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2) is essential for immortalisation of B-cells and stimulates viral and cellular gene expression through interaction with DNA-bound transcription factors. Like its cellular homologue Notch, it associates with the DNA-bound repressor RBPJκ (CSL/CBF1) thereby converting RBPJκ into the active state. For instance, both EBNA2 and Notch activate the cellular HES1 promoter. In EBV-transformed lymphocytes, the RNA of the NP9 protein encoded by human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K(HML-2) Type 1 is strongly up-regulated. The NP9 protein is detectable both in EBV-positive Raji cells, a Burkitt's lymphoma cell line, and in IB4, an EBV-transformed human lymphoblastoid cell line. NP9 binds to LNX that forms a complex with the Notch regulator Numb. Therefore, the function of NP9 vis-à-vis Notch and EBNA2 was analysed. Here, we show that NP9 binds to EBNA2 and negatively affects the EBNA2-mediated activation of the viral C- and LMP2A promoters. In contrast, NP9 did neither interfere in the activation of the HES1 promoter by Notch nor the induction of the viral LMP1 promoter by EBNA2. In an electrophoretic mobility shift analysis, NP9 reduced the binding of EBNA2 to DNA-bound RBPJκ by about 50%. The down-regulation of EBNA2-activity by NP9 might represent a cellular defence mechanism against viral infection or could, alternatively, represent an adaptation of the virus to prevent excessive viral protein production that might otherwise be harmful for the infected cell
Hepitopes: A live interactive database of HLA class I epitopes in hepatitis B virus
Increased clinical and scientific scrutiny is being applied to hepatitis B virus (HBV), with focus on the development of new therapeutic approaches, ultimately aiming for cure. Defining the optimum natural CD8+ T cell immune responses that arise in HBV, mediated by HLA class I epitope presentation, may help to inform novel immunotherapeutic strategies. Therefore, we have set out to develop a comprehensive database of these epitopes in HBV, coined āHepitopesā. This undertaking has its foundations in a systematic literature review to identify the sites and sequences of all published class I epitopes in HBV. We also collected information regarding the methods used to define each epitope, and any reported associations between an immune response to this epitope and disease outcome. The results of this search have been collated into a new open-access interactive database that is available at http://www.expmedndm.ox.ac.uk/hepitopes. Over time, we will continue to refine and update this resource, as well as inviting contributions from others in the field to support its development. This unique new database is an important foundation for ongoing investigations into the nature and impact of the CD8+ T cell response to HBV