15 research outputs found

    Epsteinā€“Barr virus LMP1 oncogene polymorphism in tatar and slavic populations in Russian Federation impacting on some malignant tumours

    Get PDF
    Objective: To compare genetic structure of the main Epsteinā€“Barr virus (EBV) oncogene, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), in EBV strains circulating in two genetically distinct ethnic populations in Russian Federation, Tatars and Slavs, as well as assess an impact of diverse LMP1 variants on incidence and mortality rate for some malignant tumors partially associated with EBV infection. Materials and methods. Oral washing samples were collected from 60 ethnic Kazan Tatars and 65 ethnic Moscow Slavics. Carboxy-terminal nucleotide sequences (41 and 40 sequences, respectively) derived from hypervariable LMP1 gene region were amplified from EBV DNA samples. Next, final nucleotide sequences were translated into amino acid sequences and analyzed according to classification by Edwards et al. Results. Analysis of 41 and 40 LMP1 samples obtained from ethnic Kasan Tatars and ethnic Moscow Slavics, respectively, revealed significant difference in relevant amino acid structures. In particular, all LMP1 samples derived from Moscow Slavics were found to belong to the four protein variants: B95.8/A, Medā€“, China1 and NC. Among them, low-transforming variant B95.8/A was dominant (82.5%). In contrast, solely 21 out of 41 LMP1 samples derived from ethnic Tatars were classified as B95.8/A, Medā€“ and China1 variants. Importantly, the percentage of low-transforming B95.8/A variant among ethnic Tatar samples was significantly lower compared to that one found in Moscow Slavics (29.3% vs. 82.5%). On the other hand, seven (17.1%) out of 20 other samples formed a unique protein mono group characterized by LMP1 amino acid sequence differed from that one available in the GenBank database. Such group of variants was designated as LMP1-TatK. The remaining 13 samples (31.7%) did not match either protein variants, thereby forming the ā€œbeyond classificationā€ (LMP1-TatBC) group. Conclusion. The data obtained suggest that various LMP1 variants exist in EBV strains persisting in ethnic Tatrs and ethnic Slavics examined in Russian Federation. It was also found that EBV strains isolated from ethnic Tatars contained a unique LMP1 gene variant encoding protein LMP1-TatK lacked in EBV strains derived from ethnic Moscow Slavics. Taking into account the genealogy of Tatars, it cannot be ruled out that EBV strain bearing LMP1-TatK variant represented ethnically specific EBV strain that might circulate many centuries ago among their historical human predecessors called Mongol-Tatar tribes. In addition, it was shown that the LMP1 variants in EBV strains isolated from ethnic Kazan Tatars and ethnic Moscow Slavics did not affect the incidence and mortality of different forms of cancer consisting of EBV-associated cases

    Š’Šøрус Š­ŠæштŠµŠ¹Š½Š°ā€“Š‘Š°Ń€Ń€ у этŠ½ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠøх тŠ°Ń‚Š°Ń€: ŠøŠ½Ń„ŠøцŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Š¾ŃŃ‚ŃŒ Šø сŠøŠŗŠ²ŠµŠ½ŃŠ½Ń‹Šµ Š²Š°Ń€ŠøŠ°Š½Ń‚Ń‹ Š¾Š½ŠŗŠ¾Š³ŠµŠ½Š° LMP1

    Get PDF
    Objective of the investigation was to study the infection of ethnic Tatars with the Epsteinā€“Barr virus (EBV) and to analyze the genetic structure of the oncogene of the virus, the latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), in the virus strains of Tatar origin. Materials and methods. The materials for the study were samples of boucle flushes of 60 students from the Kazan State Medical University who are ethnic Tatars (Tatars no less than in the 3rd generation). Amplified from DNA of boucle flushes the nucleotide sequences of the LMP1 samples translated into DNA amino acid sequences, have undergone classification based on the well-known and widely used in literature the R.H. Edwards et al. classification. Results. The analysis of nucleotide and deductive amino acid sequences of the 41 LMP1 amplicons revealed their homology with only three gene variants from the R.H. Edwards et al. classification (1999): 95.8/A (29.3 %; 12/41), Medā€“ (14.6 %; 6/41) and China1 (7.3 %, 3/41).Ā Such variants of LMP1 as Alaskan, Med+, ChinŠ°2, China3 and NC, were not found. Among the LMP1 samples of Tatar origin in 20 cases (48.8 %), the composition of the mutations found did not allow them to be assigned to any of the oncogene variants listed above. Out of this number, in 7 (17.1 %) cases a mono group of LMP1 samples was found, differing not only from representatives of the Slavs, inhabitants of the European part of Russia, but also from other Kazan samples, and was designated as LMP1-TatK. The remaining 13 samples of LMP1 (31.7 %), not belonging to any of the known classifications, formed the group designated by us as an LMP1 group beside the classification (LMP1BC). Conclusion. Continuation of the study of the molecular-biological and functional properties of LMP1 in TatK and BC groups, which constitute 48.8 % of the number of gene samples studied, and an analysis of the peculiarities of the ethnic Tatar genotype, will probably help to clarify whether certain EBV strains influence morbidity and mortality in Tatar population with malignant neoplasms, which include EBVassociated cases.Š¦ŠµŠ»ŃŒ ŠøссŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½Šøя ā€“ ŠøŠ·ŃƒŃ‡ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ ŠøŠ½Ń„ŠøцŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø Š²ŠøрусŠ¾Š¼ Š­ŠæштŠµŠ¹Š½Š°ā€“Š‘Š°Ń€Ń€ (Š’Š­Š‘) этŠ½ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠøх тŠ°Ń‚Š°Ń€ Šø Š°Š½Š°Š»ŠøŠ· Š³ŠµŠ½ŠµŃ‚ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠ¾Š¹ струŠŗтуры Š¾Š½ŠŗŠ¾Š³ŠµŠ½Š° Š²ŠøрусŠ°, Š»Š°Ń‚ŠµŠ½Ń‚Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š¼ŠµŠ¼Š±Ń€Š°Š½Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š±ŠµŠ»ŠŗŠ° 1 (LMP1), Š² штŠ°Š¼Š¼Š°Ń… Š²ŠøрусŠ° тŠ°Ń‚Š°Ń€ŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ ŠæрŠ¾ŠøсхŠ¾Š¶Š“ŠµŠ½Šøя. ŠœŠ°Ń‚ŠµŃ€ŠøŠ°Š»Ń‹ Šø Š¼ŠµŃ‚Š¾Š“ы. ŠœŠ°Ń‚ŠµŃ€ŠøŠ°Š»Š¾Š¼ Š“Š»Ń ŠøссŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½Šøя сŠ»ŃƒŠ¶ŠøŠ»Šø Š±ŃƒŠŗŠŗŠ°Š»ŃŒŠ½Ń‹Šµ сŠ¼Ń‹Š²Ń‹ 60 стуŠ“ŠµŠ½Ń‚Š¾Š² ŠšŠ°Š·Š°Š½ŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ Š³Š¾ŃŃƒŠ“Š°Ń€ŃŃ‚Š²ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š¼ŠµŠ“ŠøцŠøŠ½ŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ уŠ½ŠøŠ²ŠµŃ€ŃŠøтŠµŃ‚Š°, яŠ²Š»ŃŃŽŃ‰Šøхся этŠ½ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠøŠ¼Šø тŠ°Ń‚Š°Ń€Š°Š¼Šø (Š½Šµ Š¼ŠµŠ½ŠµŠµ чŠµŠ¼ Š² III ŠæŠ¾ŠŗŠ¾Š»ŠµŠ½ŠøŠø). Š’Ń‹Š“ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½Š½ŃƒŃŽ ŠøŠ· сŠ¼Ń‹Š²Š¾Š² Š”ŠŠš ŠøсŠæŠ¾Š»ŃŒŠ·Š¾Š²Š°Š»Šø Š“Š»Ń Š°Š¼ŠæŠ»ŠøфŠøŠŗŠ°Ń†Šø LMP1. ŠŠ¼ŠæŠ»ŠøфŠøцŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Šµ ŠøŠ· Š”ŠŠš Š±ŃƒŠŗŠŗŠ°Š»ŃŒŠ½Ń‹Ń… сŠ¼Ń‹Š²Š¾Š² Š½ŃƒŠŗŠ»ŠµŠ¾Ń‚ŠøŠ“Š½Ń‹Šµ ŠæŠ¾ŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Ń‚ŠµŠ»ŃŒŠ½Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø Š¾Š±Ń€Š°Š·Ń†Š¾Š² LMP1, трŠ°Š½ŃŠ»ŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Šµ Š² Š°Š¼ŠøŠ½Š¾ŠŗŠøсŠ»Š¾Ń‚Š½Ń‹Šµ ŠæŠ¾ŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Ń‚ŠµŠ»ŃŒŠ½Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø, ŠæŠ¾Š“Š²ŠµŃ€Š³Š»Šøсь ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠøфŠøŠŗŠ°Ń†ŠøŠø Š½Š° Š¾ŃŠ½Š¾Š²Š°Š½ŠøŠø ŠøŠ·Š²ŠµŃŃ‚Š½Š¾Š¹ Šø шŠøрŠ¾ŠŗŠ¾ ŠøсŠæŠ¾Š»ŃŒŠ·ŃƒŠµŠ¼Š¾Š¹ Š² Š»ŠøтŠµŃ€Š°Ń‚ŃƒŃ€Šµ ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠøфŠøŠŗŠ°Ń†ŠøŠø R.H. Edwards Šø сŠ¾Š°Š²Ń‚. Š ŠµŠ·ŃƒŠ»ŃŒŃ‚Š°Ń‚Ń‹. ŠŠ½Š°Š»ŠøŠ· Š½ŃƒŠŗŠ»ŠµŠ¾Ń‚ŠøŠ“Š½Ń‹Ń… Šø трŠ°Š½ŃŠ»ŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Ń… Š°Š¼ŠøŠ½Š¾ŠŗŠøсŠ»Š¾Ń‚Š½Ń‹Ń… ŠæŠ¾ŃŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Ń‚ŠµŠ»ŃŒŠ½Š¾ŃŃ‚ŠµŠ¹ 41-Š³Š¾ Š°Š¼ŠæŠ»ŠøŠŗŠ¾Š½Š° LMP1 Š²Ń‹ŃŠ²ŠøŠ» Šøх Š³Š¾Š¼Š¾Š»Š¾Š³Šøю тŠ¾Š»ŃŒŠŗŠ¾ с 3 Š²Š°Ń€ŠøŠ°Š½Ń‚Š°Š¼Šø Š³ŠµŠ½Š° ŠøŠ· ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠøфŠøŠŗŠ°Ń†ŠøŠø R.H. Edwards Šø сŠ¾Š°Š²Ń‚.: 95.8/Š (29,3 %; 12/41), Medā€“ (14,6 %; 6/41) Šø China1 (7,3 %; 3/41). Š¢Š°ŠŗŠøŠµ Š²Š°Ń€ŠøŠ°Š½Ń‚Ń‹ LMP1, ŠŗŠ°Šŗ Alaskan, Med+, ChinŠ°2, China3 Šø NC, Š½Šµ Š¾Š±Š½Š°Ń€ŃƒŠ¶ŠµŠ½Ń‹. Š’ Š¾ŃŃ‚Š°Š»ŃŒŠ½Ń‹Ń… 20 сŠ»ŃƒŃ‡Š°ŃŃ… (48,8 %) сŠæŠµŠŗтр Š¾Š±Š½Š°Ń€ŃƒŠ¶ŠµŠ½Š½Ń‹Ń… Š¼ŃƒŃ‚Š°Ń†ŠøŠ¹ Š² Š¾Š±Ń€Š°Š·Ń†Š°Ń… LMP1 тŠ°Ń‚Š°Ń€ŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ ŠæрŠ¾ŠøсхŠ¾Š¶Š“ŠµŠ½Šøя Š½Šµ ŠæŠ¾Š·Š²Š¾Š»ŠøŠ» Šøх Š¾Ń‚Š½ŠµŃŃ‚Šø Š½Šø Šŗ Š¾Š“Š½Š¾Š¼Ńƒ ŠøŠ· ŠæŠµŃ€ŠµŃ‡ŠøсŠ»ŠµŠ½Š½Ń‹Ń… Š²Ń‹ŃˆŠµ Š²Š°Ń€ŠøŠ°Š½Ń‚Š¾Š² Š¾Š½ŠŗŠ¾Š³ŠµŠ½Š°. Š˜Š· Š½Šøх Š² 7 сŠ»ŃƒŃ‡Š°ŃŃ… (17,1 % Š²ŃŠµŃ… ŠøссŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Ń… Š¾Š±Ń€Š°Š·Ń†Š¾Š²) Š¾Š±Š½Š°Ń€ŃƒŠ¶ŠµŠ½Š° Š¼Š¾Š½Š¾Š³Ń€ŃƒŠæŠæŠ° Š²Š°Ń€ŠøŠ°Š½Ń‚Š¾Š² LMP1, Š¾Ń‚Š»ŠøчŠ°ŃŽŃ‰Š°ŃŃŃ Š½Šµ тŠ¾Š»ŃŒŠŗŠ¾ Š¾Ń‚ ŠæрŠµŠ“стŠ°Š²ŠøтŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ сŠ»Š°Š²ŃŠ½, Š¶ŠøтŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ ŠµŠ²Ń€Š¾ŠæŠµŠ¹ŃŠŗŠ¾Š¹ чŠ°ŃŃ‚Šø Š Š¾ŃŃŠøŠø, Š½Š¾ Šø Š¾Ń‚ Š“руŠ³Šøх ŠŗŠ°Š·Š°Š½ŃŠŗŠøх Š¾Š±Ń€Š°Š·Ń†Š¾Š², Šø Š¾Š±Š¾Š·Š½Š°Ń‡ŠµŠ½Š½Š°Ń Š½Š°Š¼Šø, ŠŗŠ°Šŗ LMP1-TatK. ŠžŃŃ‚Š°Š»ŃŒŠ½Ń‹Šµ 13 Š¾Š±Ń€Š°Š·Ń†Š¾Š² LMP1 (31,7 %), Š½Šµ Š¾Ń‚Š½Š¾ŃŃŃ‰Šøхся Š½Šø Šŗ Š¾Š“Š½Š¾Š¹ ŠøŠ· ŠøŠ·Š²ŠµŃŃ‚Š½Ń‹Ń… ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠøфŠøŠŗŠ°Ń†ŠøŠ¹, сфŠ¾Ń€Š¼ŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š»Šø Š³Ń€ŃƒŠæŠæу, Š¾Š±Š¾Š·Š½Š°Ń‡ŠµŠ½Š½ŃƒŃŽ Š½Š°Š¼Šø, ŠŗŠ°Šŗ Š³Ń€ŃƒŠæŠæŠ° LMP1 Š²Š½Šµ ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠøфŠøŠŗŠ°Ń†ŠøŠø (LMP1Š’Šš). Š—Š°ŠŗŠ»ŃŽŃ‡ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ. Š”Š°Š»ŃŒŠ½ŠµŠ¹ŃˆŠµŠµ ŠøŠ·ŃƒŃ‡ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ Š¼Š¾Š»ŠµŠŗуŠ»ŃŃ€Š½Š¾-Š±ŠøŠ¾Š»Š¾Š³ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠøх Šø фуŠ½ŠŗцŠøŠ¾Š½Š°Š»ŃŒŠ½Ń‹Ń… сŠ²Š¾Š¹ŃŃ‚Š² LMP1 Š² Š³Ń€ŃƒŠæŠæŠ°Ń… Š’Šš Šø TatK, сŠ¾ŃŃ‚Š°Š²Š»ŃŃŽŃ‰Šøх 48,8 % Š¾Ń‚ чŠøсŠ»Š° ŠøŠ·ŃƒŃ‡ŠµŠ½Š½Ń‹Ń… Š¾Š±Ń€Š°Š·Ń†Š¾Š² Š¾Š½ŠŗŠ¾Š±ŠµŠ»ŠŗŠ°, Šø Š°Š½Š°Š»ŠøŠ· Š¾ŃŠ¾Š±ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾ŃŃ‚ŠµŠ¹ Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Ń‚ŠøŠæŠ° этŠ½ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠøх тŠ°Ń‚Š°Ń€, Š²ŠµŃ€Š¾ŃŃ‚Š½Š¾, ŠæŠ¾Š·Š²Š¾Š»ŃŃ‚ Š²Ń‹ŃŃŠ½Šøть, Š¾ŠŗŠ°Š·Ń‹Š²Š°ŃŽŃ‚ Š»Šø Š¾ŠæрŠµŠ“ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½Š½Ń‹Šµ штŠ°Š¼Š¼Ń‹ Š’Š­Š‘ Š²Š»ŠøяŠ½ŠøŠµ Š½Š° ŠæŠ¾ŠŗŠ°Š·Š°Ń‚ŠµŠ»Šø Š·Š°Š±Š¾Š»ŠµŠ²Š°ŠµŠ¼Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø Šø сŠ¼ŠµŃ€Ń‚Š½Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø Š·Š»Š¾ŠŗŠ°Ń‡ŠµŃŃ‚Š²ŠµŠ½Š½Ń‹Š¼Šø Š½Š¾Š²Š¾Š¾Š±Ń€Š°Š·Š¾Š²Š°Š½ŠøяŠ¼Šø, Š² сŠ¾ŃŃ‚Š°Š² ŠŗŠ¾Ń‚Š¾Ń€Ń‹Ń… Š²Ń…Š¾Š“ят Š’Š­Š‘-Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Šµ сŠ»ŃƒŃ‡Š°Šø, у тŠ°Ń‚Š°Ń€ŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ Š½Š°ŃŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½Šøя

    Š Š°ŃŠæрŠµŠ“ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² HLA II у Š±Š¾Š»ŃŒŠ½Ń‹Ń… рŠ°ŠŗŠ¾Š¼ Š½Š¾ŃŠ¾Š³Š»Š¾Ń‚ŠŗŠø, Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Š¼ с Š²ŠøрусŠ¾Š¼ Š­ŠæштŠµŠ¹Š½Š°ā€“Š‘Š°Ń€Ń€, Šø Š“руŠ³ŠøŠ¼Šø Š¾ŠæухŠ¾Š»ŃŠ¼Šø рŠ¾Ń‚Š¾Š²Š¾Š¹ ŠæŠ¾Š»Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø Š² Š Š¾ŃŃŠøŠø

    Get PDF
    Background. It has been proved that for the nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) the etiological agent is the Epsteinā€“Barr virus (EBV). Being an ubiquitous infection, EBV, under certain conditions, is able to display its oncogenic potential. Among a wide range of tumors associated with EBV, the NPC occupies a special place because it is characterized by a geographically and ethnically heterogeneous distribution, suggesting that in the pathogenesis of NPC, in addition to EBV, an important role is played by other factors, such as genetic predisposition to this neoplasm. Among known genetic factors influencing the frequency of NPC development, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex occupies an important place, as it plays a central role in the presentation of viral antigens to the immune system. In Russia, the association of HLA alleles with the risk of EBV associated forms of NPC development and with development of other oral cavity tumors (OOCT), not associated with the virus, has not been studied. In the literature there are contradictory information about HLA genes, which determine the predisposition to the emergence of these tumors, and their role in the initiation and formation an immune response to EBV proteins.Objective: to study the distribution of the of DQA1-, DQB1-, DRB1-HLA class II gene variants associated with respectively the risk or resistance to the development of NPC and OOCT and with a high and low level of antibody response to EBV main proteins. A group of healthy persons served as a control.Materials and methods. Blood samples from 62 patients with NPC, 44 patients with OOCT, and as control, 300 healthy individuals, were used in the study. The blood serum samples of NPC and OOCT patients were tested for the presence of immunoglobulin classes G and A antibodies to capsid and early EBV antigens by indirect immunofluorescence. All serum samples of patients and healthy individuals were genotyped on HLA-DQA1, -DQB1 and -DRB1 by the method of multi-primer amplification by sequence-specific primers by real-time polymerase chain reaction.Results. In NPC patients, an increase in the frequency of HLA-DRB1*08 was found when compared with the frequency of a similar allele in healthy individuals (5.6 % vs 1.8 %; odds ratio (OR) 3.2; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.1ā€“9.1; p = 0.02), and, on the contrary, a lower HLA-DQB1*0301 frequency was detected (16.1 % vs 25.3 %; p <0.05) than in healthy individuals. The data obtained suggest that the HLA-DRB1*08 gene is associated with an increased sensitivity to NPC.In OOCT patients, HLA-DQB1*0502ā€“4 and HLA-DRB1*16 variants were less common than in healthy individuals (1.1 % vs 6.8 %; p <0.05 and 1.1 % vs 6.7 %; OR 0.16; 95 % CI 0.01ā€“1.08; p <0.05, respectively), suggesting that the HLA-DQB1*0301 gene is associated with resistance to NPC, and HLA-DQB1*0502ā€“4 and HLA-DRB1*16 variants ā€“ with resistance to OOCT. It is interesting to note the difference in the frequency of HLA-DRB1*13 between NPC and OOCT patients (17.7 % vs 6.8 %; OR 2.9; 95 %CI 1.1ā€“8.6; p <0.05). One can suggest that this difference is related to the proven involvement of EBV in the NPC development. There were no other differences in the frequencies of class II HLA genes between the groups of NPC and OOCT patients. For the first time in Russia the importance of alleles DQA1, DQB1 and DRB1 of the HLA gene for the NPC and OOCT development, malignant tumors, respectively associated and non-associated with EBV, was studied. The results of the investigation completed together with known literature data allow us to conclude that the above alleles of the HLA class II gene can serve as a factor predisposing to the development of NPC in Russia.Conclusion. However, in order to establish a strict association between a specific HLA haplotype and the NPC and OOCT incidence, the information obtained is insufficient due to the complexity and variability of the genetic control of immune responses controlling the tumor process. A comprehensive study of this issue using different immune response genes and populations of different ethnic origins will probably help to elucidate the effect of genetic polymorphism on the risk of NPC and OOCT development in Russia.Š’Š²ŠµŠ“ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ. ŠŠ°Š·Š¾Ń„Š°Ń€ŠøŠ½Š³ŠµŠ°Š»ŃŒŠ½Š°Ń ŠŗŠ°Ń€Ń†ŠøŠ½Š¾Š¼Š° (рŠ°Šŗ Š½Š¾ŃŠ¾Š³Š»Š¾Ń‚ŠŗŠø, Š ŠŠ“), ŠŗŠ°Šŗ ŠøŠ·Š²ŠµŃŃ‚Š½Š¾, стрŠ¾Š³Š¾ Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š° с Š²ŠøрусŠ¾Š¼ Š­ŠæштŠµŠ¹Š½Š°ā€“Š‘Š°Ń€Ń€ (Š’Š­Š‘). ŠžŠ“Š½Š°ŠŗŠ¾ Š’Š­Š‘ яŠ²Š»ŃŠµŃ‚ся уŠ±ŠøŠŗŠ²ŠøтŠ°Ń€Š½Š¾Š¹ ŠøŠ½Ń„ŠµŠŗцŠøŠµŠ¹, тŠ¾Š³Š“Š° ŠŗŠ°Šŗ Š ŠŠ“ рŠ°Š·Š²ŠøŠ²Š°ŠµŃ‚ся Š“Š¾Š²Š¾Š»ŃŒŠ½Š¾ рŠµŠ“ŠŗŠ¾ Šø хŠ°Ń€Š°ŠŗтŠµŃ€ŠøŠ·ŃƒŠµŃ‚ся Š³ŠµŠ¾Š³Ń€Š°Ń„ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠø Šø этŠ½ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠø Š½ŠµŠ¾Š“Š½Š¾Ń€Š¾Š“Š½Ń‹Š¼ рŠ°ŃŠæрŠ¾ŃŃ‚Ń€Š°Š½ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµŠ¼, чтŠ¾ ŠæŠ¾Š·Š²Š¾Š»ŃŠµŃ‚ ŠæрŠµŠ“ŠæŠ¾Š»Š¾Š¶Šøть Š²Š°Š¶Š½ŃƒŃŽ рŠ¾Š»ŃŒ Š“руŠ³Šøх ŠŗŠ¾Ń„Š°ŠŗтŠ¾Ń€Š¾Š² Š² ŠæŠ°Ń‚Š¾Š³ŠµŠ½ŠµŠ·Šµ Š ŠŠ“, тŠ°ŠŗŠøх ŠŗŠ°Šŗ Š¾ŠŗруŠ¶Š°ŃŽŃ‰Š°Ń срŠµŠ“Š° Šø Š³ŠµŠ½ŠµŃ‚ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠ°Ń ŠæрŠµŠ“рŠ°ŃŠæŠ¾Š»Š¾Š¶ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾ŃŃ‚ŃŒ. Š”рŠµŠ“Šø ŠøŠ·Š²ŠµŃŃ‚Š½Ń‹Ń… Š³ŠµŠ½ŠµŃ‚ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠøх фŠ°ŠŗтŠ¾Ń€Š¾Š², Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Ń… с Š ŠŠ“, Š³Š»Š°Š²Š½Ń‹Š¹ ŠŗŠ¾Š¼ŠæŠ»ŠµŠŗс Š³ŠøстŠ¾ŃŠ¾Š²Š¼ŠµŃŃ‚ŠøŠ¼Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø (Š»ŠµŠ¹ŠŗŠ¾Ń†ŠøтŠ°Ń€Š½Ń‹Š¹ Š°Š½Ń‚ŠøŠ³ŠµŠ½ чŠµŠ»Š¾Š²ŠµŠŗŠ°, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)) Š·Š°Š½ŠøŠ¼Š°ŠµŃ‚ Š²Š°Š¶Š½Š¾Šµ ŠæŠ¾Š»Š¾Š¶ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ, тŠ°Šŗ ŠŗŠ°Šŗ ŠøŠ³Ń€Š°ŠµŃ‚ ŠŗŠ»ŃŽŃ‡ŠµŠ²ŃƒŃŽ рŠ¾Š»ŃŒ Š² ŠæрŠµŠ·ŠµŠ½Ń‚Š°Ń†ŠøŠø Š²ŠøрусŠ½Ń‹Ń… Š°Š½Ń‚ŠøŠ³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃƒŠ½Š½Š¾Š¹ сŠøстŠµŠ¼Ń‹. Š’ Š Š¾ŃŃŠøŠø ŠøŠ·ŃƒŃ‡ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠ°Ń†ŠøŠø Š°Š»Š»ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ HLA с рŠøсŠŗŠ¾Š¼ рŠ°Š·Š²ŠøтŠøя Š ŠŠ“, сŠ²ŃŠ·Š°Š½Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ с Š’Š­Š‘, Š½Šµ ŠæрŠ¾Š²Š¾Š“ŠøŠ»Š¾ŃŃŒ, Š° Š² Š»ŠøтŠµŃ€Š°Ń‚ŃƒŃ€Šµ сущŠµŃŃ‚Š²ŃƒŃŽŃ‚ ŠæрŠ¾Ń‚ŠøŠ²Š¾Ń€ŠµŃ‡ŠøŠ²Ń‹Šµ сŠ²ŠµŠ“ŠµŠ½Šøя Š¾ рŠ¾Š»Šø рŠ°Š·Š½Ń‹Ń… HLA-Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² ŠŗŠ°Šŗ Š² Š²Š¾Š·Š½ŠøŠŗŠ½Š¾Š²ŠµŠ½ŠøŠø Šø рŠ°Š·Š²ŠøтŠøŠø Š ŠŠ“, тŠ°Šŗ Šø Š² ŠøŠ½ŠøцŠøŠ°Ń†ŠøŠø Šø Š¾ŃŠ¾Š±ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾ŃŃ‚ŃŃ… ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃƒŠ½Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š¾Ń‚Š²ŠµŃ‚Š° Šŗ Š±ŠµŠ»ŠŗŠ°Š¼ Š’Š­Š‘.Š¦ŠµŠ»ŃŒ ŠøссŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½Šøя ā€“ ŠøŠ·ŃƒŃ‡ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ рŠ°ŃŠæрŠµŠ“ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½Šøя Š²Š°Ń€ŠøŠ°Š½Ń‚Š¾Š² DQA1-, DQB1-, DRB1-Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² HLA ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠ° II у Š±Š¾Š»ŃŒŠ½Ń‹Ń… Š ŠŠ“ Šø ŠæŠ°Ń†ŠøŠµŠ½Ń‚Š¾Š² с Š“руŠ³ŠøŠ¼Šø Š¾ŠæухŠ¾Š»ŃŠ¼Šø ŠæŠ¾Š»Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø ртŠ° (Š”ŠžŠŸŠ ), Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Š¼Šø Šø Š½Šµ Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Š¼Šø с Š’Š­Š‘, Š² Š³Ń€ŃƒŠæŠæŠ°Ń… с Š²Ń‹ŃŠ¾ŠŗŠøŠ¼ Šø Š½ŠøŠ·ŠŗŠøŠ¼ урŠ¾Š²Š½ŠµŠ¼ Š³ŃƒŠ¼Š¾Ń€Š°Š»ŃŒŠ½Š¾Š³Š¾ ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃƒŠ½Š½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š¾Ń‚Š²ŠµŃ‚Š° Šŗ Š¾ŃŠ½Š¾Š²Š½Ń‹Š¼ Š±ŠµŠ»ŠŗŠ°Š¼ Š’Š­Š‘ ŠæŠ¾ срŠ°Š²Š½ŠµŠ½Šøю с ŠŗŠ¾Š½Ń‚Ń€Š¾Š»ŃŒŠ½Š¾Š¹ Š³Ń€ŃƒŠæŠæŠ¾Š¹ Š·Š“Š¾Ń€Š¾Š²Ń‹Ń… Š»Šøц.ŠœŠ°Ń‚ŠµŃ€ŠøŠ°Š»Ń‹ Šø Š¼ŠµŃ‚Š¾Š“ы. Š’сŠµŠ³Š¾ Š² ŠøссŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½ŠøŠµ Š²Š¾ŃˆŠ»Šø 62 Š±Š¾Š»ŃŒŠ½Ń‹Ń… Š½ŠµŠ“ŠøффŠµŃ€ŠµŠ½Ń†ŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Š¼ Š ŠŠ“ Šø 44 ŠæŠ°Ń†ŠøŠµŠ½Ń‚Š° с Š”ŠžŠŸŠ , Š° тŠ°ŠŗŠ¶Šµ 300 Š·Š“Š¾Ń€Š¾Š²Ń‹Ń… Š»Šøц. Š”ыŠ²Š¾Ń€Š¾Ń‚ŠŗŠ° ŠŗрŠ¾Š²Šø Š²ŃŠµŃ… Š±Š¾Š»ŃŒŠ½Ń‹Ń… Š±Ń‹Š»Š° ŠæрŠ¾Ń‚ŠµŃŃ‚ŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š° Š½Š° Š½Š°Š»ŠøчŠøŠµ Š°Š½Ń‚ŠøтŠµŠ» ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃƒŠ½Š¾Š³Š»Š¾Š±ŃƒŠ»ŠøŠ½Š¾Š² ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠ¾Š² G Šø Š Šŗ ŠŗŠ°ŠæсŠøŠ“Š½Š¾Š¼Ńƒ Šø рŠ°Š½Š½ŠµŠ¼Ńƒ Š°Š½Ń‚ŠøŠ³ŠµŠ½Š°Š¼ Š’Š­Š‘ Š¼ŠµŃ‚Š¾Š“Š¾Š¼ Š½ŠµŠæряŠ¼Š¾Š¹ ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃƒŠ½Š¾Ń„Š»ŃŽŠ¾Ń€ŠµŃŃ†ŠµŠ½Ń†ŠøŠø. Š’сŠµ Š¾Š±Ń€Š°Š·Ń†Ń‹ Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Ń‚ŠøŠæŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Ń‹ Š½Š° HLA-DQA1, -DQB1 Šø -DRB1 с ŠæŠ¾Š¼Š¾Ń‰ŃŒŃŽ Š¼ŃƒŠ»ŃŒŃ‚ŠøŠæрŠ°Š¹Š¼ŠµŃ€Š½Š¾Š¹ Š°Š¼ŠæŠ»ŠøфŠøŠŗŠ°Ń†ŠøŠø сŠøŠŗŠ²ŠµŠ½Ń-сŠæŠµŃ†ŠøфŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠøŠ¼Šø ŠæрŠ°Š¹Š¼ŠµŃ€Š°Š¼Šø Š¼ŠµŃ‚Š¾Š“Š¾Š¼ ŠæŠ¾Š»ŠøŠ¼ŠµŃ€Š°Š·Š½Š¾Š¹ цŠµŠæŠ½Š¾Š¹ рŠµŠ°ŠŗцŠøŠø Š² рŠµŠ¶ŠøŠ¼Šµ рŠµŠ°Š»ŃŒŠ½Š¾Š³Š¾ Š²Ń€ŠµŠ¼ŠµŠ½Šø.Š ŠµŠ·ŃƒŠ»ŃŒŃ‚Š°Ń‚Ń‹. ŠŸŠ¾ŠŗŠ°Š·Š°Š½Š¾ уŠ²ŠµŠ»ŠøчŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ чŠ°ŃŃ‚Š¾Ń‚Ń‹ HLA-DRB1*08 у ŠæŠ°Ń†ŠøŠµŠ½Ń‚Š¾Š² с Š ŠŠ“ ŠæŠ¾ срŠ°Š²Š½ŠµŠ½Šøю с ŠŗŠ¾Š½Ń‚Ń€Š¾Š»ŠµŠ¼ (5,6 % ŠæрŠ¾Ń‚ŠøŠ² 1,8 %; Š¾Ń‚Š½Š¾ŃˆŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ шŠ°Š½ŃŠ¾Š² (ŠžŠØ) 3,2; 95 % Š“Š¾Š²ŠµŃ€ŠøтŠµŠ»ŃŒŠ½Ń‹Š¹ ŠøŠ½Ń‚ŠµŃ€Š²Š°Š» (Š”Š˜) 1,1ā€“9,1; р = 0,02). Š’Š¾Š·Š¼Š¾Š¶Š½Š¾, Š³ŠµŠ½ HLA-DRB1*08 Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½ с ŠæŠ¾Š²Ń‹ŃˆŠµŠ½Š½Š¾Š¹ чуŠ²ŃŃ‚Š²ŠøтŠµŠ»ŃŒŠ½Š¾ŃŃ‚ŃŒŃŽ Šŗ Š ŠŠ“. Š’ тŠ¾ Š¶Šµ Š²Ń€ŠµŠ¼Ń у ŠæŠ°Ń†ŠøŠµŠ½Ń‚Š¾Š² с Š ŠŠ“ Š±Ń‹Š»Š° Š²Ń‹ŃŠ²Š»ŠµŠ½Š° Š±Š¾Š»ŠµŠµ Š½ŠøŠ·ŠŗŠ°Ń, чŠµŠ¼ Š² ŠŗŠ¾Š½Ń‚Ń€Š¾Š»Šµ, чŠ°ŃŃ‚Š¾Ń‚Š° HLA-DQB1*0301 (16,1 % ŠæрŠ¾Ń‚ŠøŠ² 25,3 %; р <0,05). Š’Š°Ń€ŠøŠ°Š½Ń‚ HLA-DQB1*0502ā€“4, Š½Š°Š¾Š±Š¾Ń€Š¾Ń‚, рŠµŠ¶Šµ Š²ŃŃ‚Ń€ŠµŃ‡Š°Š»ŃŃ у ŠæŠ°Ń†ŠøŠµŠ½Ń‚Š¾Š² с Š”ŠžŠŸŠ , чŠµŠ¼ Š² ŠŗŠ¾Š½Ń‚Ń€Š¾Š»Šµ (1,1 % ŠæрŠ¾Ń‚ŠøŠ² 6,8 %; р <0,05). ŠŠ½Š°Š»Š¾Š³ŠøчŠ½Ń‹Šµ Š½Š°Š±Š»ŃŽŠ“ŠµŠ½Šøя ŠŗŠ°ŃŠ°ŃŽŃ‚ся HLA-DRB1*16, чŠ°ŃŃ‚Š¾Ń‚Š° ŠŗŠ¾Ń‚Š¾Ń€Š¾Š³Š¾ у ŠæŠ°Ń†ŠøŠµŠ½Ń‚Š¾Š² с Š”ŠžŠŸŠ  Š±Ń‹Š»Š° Š½ŠøŠ¶Šµ, чŠµŠ¼ Š² ŠŗŠ¾Š½Ń‚Ń€Š¾Š»Šµ (1,1 % ŠæрŠ¾Ń‚ŠøŠ² 6,7 %; ŠžŠØ 0,16; 95 % Š”Š˜ 0,01ā€“1,08; р <0,05), т. Šµ. Š³ŠµŠ½ HLA-DQB1*0301 Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½ с рŠµŠ·ŠøстŠµŠ½Ń‚Š½Š¾ŃŃ‚ŃŒŃŽ Šŗ Š ŠŠ“, Š° Š²Š°Ń€ŠøŠ°Š½Ń‚Ń‹ HLA-DQB1*0502ā€“4 Šø HLA-DRB1*16 ā€“ с рŠµŠ·ŠøстŠµŠ½Ń‚Š½Š¾ŃŃ‚ŃŒŃŽ Šŗ Š”ŠžŠŸŠ .Š˜Š½Ń‚ŠµŃ€ŠµŃŠµŠ½ фŠ°Šŗт Š¾Š±Š½Š°Ń€ŃƒŠ¶ŠµŠ½Šøя рŠ°Š·Š»ŠøчŠøŠ¹ Š² чŠ°ŃŃ‚Š¾Ń‚Šµ HLA-DRB1*13 у ŠæŠ°Ń†ŠøŠµŠ½Ń‚Š¾Š² с Š ŠŠ“ Šø Š”ŠžŠŸŠ  (17,7 % ŠæрŠ¾Ń‚ŠøŠ² 6,8 %; ŠžŠØ 2,9; 95 % Š”Š˜ 1,1ā€“8,6; р <0,05). Š­Ń‚Šø рŠ°Š·Š»ŠøчŠøя Š¼Š¾Š³ŃƒŃ‚ Š±Ń‹Ń‚ŃŒ сŠ²ŃŠ·Š°Š½Ń‹ с Š“Š¾ŠŗŠ°Š·Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Š¼ учŠ°ŃŃ‚ŠøŠµŠ¼ Š’Š­Š‘ Š² рŠ°Š·Š²ŠøтŠøŠø Š ŠŠ“. Š”Ń€ŃƒŠ³Šøх рŠ°Š·Š»ŠøчŠøŠ¹ ŠæŠ¾ чŠ°ŃŃ‚Š¾Ń‚Š°Š¼ Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² HLA ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠ° II Š¼ŠµŠ¶Š“у Š³Ń€ŃƒŠæŠæŠ°Š¼Šø ŠæŠ°Ń†ŠøŠµŠ½Ń‚Š¾Š² с Š ŠŠ“ Šø Š”ŠžŠŸŠ  Š½Šµ Š²Ń‹ŃŠ²Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾. Š’ŠæŠµŃ€Š²Ń‹Šµ Š² Š Š¾ŃŃŠøŠø ŠæрŠ¾Š²ŠµŠ“ŠµŠ½Š¾ ŠøŠ·ŃƒŃ‡ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ сŠ²ŃŠ·Šø Š°Š»Š»ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ DQA1, DQB1 Šø DRB1 Š³ŠµŠ½Š° HLA с рŠ°Š·Š²ŠøтŠøŠµŠ¼ Š½Š°Š·Š¾Ń„Š°Ń€ŠøŠ½Š³ŠµŠ°Š»ŃŒŠ½Š¾Š¹ ŠŗŠ°Ń€Ń†ŠøŠ½Š¾Š¼Ń‹ (Š ŠŠ“) Šø Š”ŠžŠŸŠ , Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Ń… Šø Š½Šµ Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠøрŠ¾Š²Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Ń… с Š’Š­Š‘.Š—Š°ŠŗŠ»ŃŽŃ‡ŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ. ŠŠ°ŃˆŠø ŠøссŠ»ŠµŠ“Š¾Š²Š°Š½Šøя Š² сŠ¾Š²Š¾ŠŗуŠæŠ½Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø с уŠ¶Šµ ŠøŠ·Š²ŠµŃŃ‚Š½Ń‹Š¼Šø Š“Š°Š½Š½Ń‹Š¼Šø ŠæŠ¾Š·Š²Š¾Š»ŃŃŽŃ‚ Š·Š°ŠŗŠ»ŃŽŃ‡Šøть, чтŠ¾ ŠøŠ¼ŠµŠµŃ‚ся Š¾ŠæрŠµŠ“ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ½Š½Š°Ń сŠ²ŃŠ·ŃŒ Š³ŠµŠ½Š¾Š² HLA ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠ° II c рŠ°Š·Š²ŠøтŠøŠµŠ¼ Š ŠŠ“, Š¾Š“Š½Š°ŠŗŠ¾ Š“Š»Ń устŠ°Š½Š¾Š²Š»ŠµŠ½Šøя стрŠ¾Š³Š¾Š¹ Š°ŃŃŠ¾Ń†ŠøŠ°Ń†ŠøŠø Š°Š»Š»ŠµŠ»ŠµŠ¹ HLA ŠŗŠ»Š°ŃŃŠ° II с Š ŠŠ“ Šø Š“руŠ³ŠøŠ¼Šø Š¾ŠæухŠ¾Š»ŃŠ¼Šø Š¾Š±Š»Š°ŃŃ‚Šø Š³Š¾Š»Š¾Š²Ń‹ Šø шŠµŠø ŠæŠ¾Š»ŃƒŃ‡ŠµŠ½Š½Ń‹Ń… сŠ²ŠµŠ“ŠµŠ½ŠøŠ¹ Š½ŠµŠ“Š¾ŃŃ‚Š°Ń‚Š¾Ń‡Š½Š¾ ŠøŠ·-Š·Š° сŠ»Š¾Š¶Š½Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø Šø Š²Š°Ń€ŠøŠ°Š±ŠµŠ»ŃŒŠ½Š¾ŃŃ‚Šø Š³ŠµŠ½ŠµŃ‚ŠøчŠµŃŠŗŠ¾Š³Š¾ ŠŗŠ¾Š½Ń‚Ń€Š¾Š»Ń ŠøŠ¼Š¼ŃƒŠ½Š½Ń‹Ń… рŠµŠ°ŠŗцŠøŠ¹, ŠŗŠ¾Š½Ń‚Ń€Š¾Š»ŠøрующŠøх Š¾ŠæухŠ¾Š»ŠµŠ²Ń‹Š¹ ŠæрŠ¾Ń†ŠµŃŃ

    Epigenetic mechanisms in virus-induced tumorigenesis

    Get PDF
    About 15ā€“20% of human cancers worldwide have viral etiology. Emerging data clearly indicate that several human DNA and RNA viruses, such as human papillomavirus, Epsteinā€“Barr virus, Kaposiā€™s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and human T-cell lymphotropic virus, contribute to cancer development. Human tumor-associated viruses have evolved multiple molecular mechanisms to disrupt specific cellular pathways to facilitate aberrant replication. Although oncogenic viruses belong to different families, their strategies in human cancer development show many similarities and involve viral-encoded oncoproteins targeting the key cellular proteins that regulate cell growth. Recent studies show that virus and host interactions also occur at the epigenetic level. In this review, we summarize the published information related to the interactions between viral proteins and epigenetic machinery which lead to alterations in the epigenetic landscape of the cell contributing to carcinogenesis

    P20

    Get PDF
    The Epsteinā€“Barr virus (EBV) represents an etiological agent for a number of human benign and malignant tumors. One of the EBV encoded proteins, the latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), is involved in activation of many signaling pathways and transcription factors leading EBV infected cells to immortalization and transformation. Itā€™s well known that almost all worldsā€™ population is infected with EBV. As usually, infection occurs during early childhood without serious consequences for infected people. At the same time a secondary infection by additional EBV strain(s) occurs quite often. During the in vitro cultivation of peripheral blood lymphocyte from persons infected with multiple strains of the virus, only one of them having LMP1 oncogene with highest transforming potential becomes dominant while the others are eliminated. To figure out whether pattern of LMP1 expressions reflects the origin of EBV strains, six cell lines from patients with tumors, associated and not-associated with the virus and healthy individuals were established. The nucleotide and deductive amino acid (a.a.) sequences of LMP1 isolates tested were analyzed and compared with those of LMP1 isolates obtained from eight cell lines of African and Japanese EBV-associated Burkittā€™s lymphomas (BL) origin. As the result, in four out of six cell lines of Russian origin (2 from patients with lymphoid pathology and 2 from PBLs of blood donors) the low divergent LMP1 B95.8/A variant characterized by a low transforming activity and a small number of a.a. substitutions was detected. For other two cell lines originated from EBV-associated patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and not virus-associated Hodgkinā€™s lymphoma patient the LMP1Med- and LMP1China1 variants, characterized by a larger set of mutations and high transforming potential, were found. Low divergent LMP1 variants (B95.8 or B95.8/A) were observed for 13 of 15 LMP1 samples from PBLs of Russian blood donors; in 2 donors highly divergent China1 and NC LMP1 variants were also detected. Among eight cell lines of BL origin three lines were the sources of the prototype EBV strain B95.8 (Jijoye, P3HR1, Raji). From other five cell lines (Daudi, Namalva, Ag 876, NC37 and Akata) LMP1 variants Med- and China1, characterized by a significant number of mutations and high transforming capacity were obtained. Genetic relationship between LMP1 isolates from cell lines of Russian and BL origin were analyzed by the phylogenetic tree. It follows from the constructed tree that cell lines of Russian and BL lymphoma origin formed two separate clusters located at the tree a distance from each other, indicating genetic proximity for respective groups of cell lines. The data obtained complemented with the results of our previous studies suggest that among Russians represented by cancer patients and healthy individuals, EBV strains with predominantly low transforming capacity of LMP1 are persisting. These findings are likely can explain the non-endemic nature of the EBV-associated pathologies in Russia.On the other hand, one can speculate that in African countries which are endemic for BL highly oncogenic strains of EBV are dominated, the indirect confirmation of what is the detection in cell lines of BL origin LMP1 isolates having high transforming activity. The results of this study let us also to suggest that LMP1 expression pattern in non-endemic region like Russia does not reflect the type of malignancy but rather reflect their geographic origin

    P20

    Full text link

    HLA II genes distribution in Epsteinā€“Barr virus-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma and other tumors of the oral cavity patients in Russia

    Get PDF
    Background. It has been proved that for the nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) the etiological agent is the Epsteinā€“Barr virus (EBV). Being an ubiquitous infection, EBV, under certain conditions, is able to display its oncogenic potential. Among a wide range of tumors associated with EBV, the NPC occupies a special place because it is characterized by a geographically and ethnically heterogeneous distribution, suggesting that in the pathogenesis of NPC, in addition to EBV, an important role is played by other factors, such as genetic predisposition to this neoplasm. Among known genetic factors influencing the frequency of NPC development, the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex occupies an important place, as it plays a central role in the presentation of viral antigens to the immune system. In Russia, the association of HLA alleles with the risk of EBV associated forms of NPC development and with development of other oral cavity tumors (OOCT), not associated with the virus, has not been studied. In the literature there are contradictory information about HLA genes, which determine the predisposition to the emergence of these tumors, and their role in the initiation and formation an immune response to EBV proteins.Objective: to study the distribution of the of DQA1-, DQB1-, DRB1-HLA class II gene variants associated with respectively the risk or resistance to the development of NPC and OOCT and with a high and low level of antibody response to EBV main proteins. A group of healthy persons served as a control.Materials and methods. Blood samples from 62 patients with NPC, 44 patients with OOCT, and as control, 300 healthy individuals, were used in the study. The blood serum samples of NPC and OOCT patients were tested for the presence of immunoglobulin classes G and A antibodies to capsid and early EBV antigens by indirect immunofluorescence. All serum samples of patients and healthy individuals were genotyped on HLA-DQA1, -DQB1 and -DRB1 by the method of multi-primer amplification by sequence-specific primers by real-time polymerase chain reaction.Results. In NPC patients, an increase in the frequency of HLA-DRB1*08 was found when compared with the frequency of a similar allele in healthy individuals (5.6 % vs 1.8 %; odds ratio (OR) 3.2; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.1ā€“9.1; p = 0.02), and, on the contrary, a lower HLA-DQB1*0301 frequency was detected (16.1 % vs 25.3 %; p <0.05) than in healthy individuals. The data obtained suggest that the HLA-DRB1*08 gene is associated with an increased sensitivity to NPC.In OOCT patients, HLA-DQB1*0502ā€“4 and HLA-DRB1*16 variants were less common than in healthy individuals (1.1 % vs 6.8 %; p <0.05 and 1.1 % vs 6.7 %; OR 0.16; 95 % CI 0.01ā€“1.08; p <0.05, respectively), suggesting that the HLA-DQB1*0301 gene is associated with resistance to NPC, and HLA-DQB1*0502ā€“4 and HLA-DRB1*16 variants ā€“ with resistance to OOCT. It is interesting to note the difference in the frequency of HLA-DRB1*13 between NPC and OOCT patients (17.7 % vs 6.8 %; OR 2.9; 95 %CI 1.1ā€“8.6; p <0.05). One can suggest that this difference is related to the proven involvement of EBV in the NPC development. There were no other differences in the frequencies of class II HLA genes between the groups of NPC and OOCT patients. For the first time in Russia the importance of alleles DQA1, DQB1 and DRB1 of the HLA gene for the NPC and OOCT development, malignant tumors, respectively associated and non-associated with EBV, was studied. The results of the investigation completed together with known literature data allow us to conclude that the above alleles of the HLA class II gene can serve as a factor predisposing to the development of NPC in Russia.Conclusion. However, in order to establish a strict association between a specific HLA haplotype and the NPC and OOCT incidence, the information obtained is insufficient due to the complexity and variability of the genetic control of immune responses controlling the tumor process. A comprehensive study of this issue using different immune response genes and populations of different ethnic origins will probably help to elucidate the effect of genetic polymorphism on the risk of NPC and OOCT development in Russia

    Epsteinā€“Barr virus in the ethnic Tatars population: the infection and sequence variants of LMP1 oncogene

    Get PDF
    Objective of the investigation was to study the infection of ethnic Tatars with the Epsteinā€“Barr virus (EBV) and to analyze the genetic structure of the oncogene of the virus, the latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), in the virus strains of Tatar origin. Materials and methods. The materials for the study were samples of boucle flushes of 60 students from the Kazan State Medical University who are ethnic Tatars (Tatars no less than in the 3rd generation). Amplified from DNA of boucle flushes the nucleotide sequences of the LMP1 samples translated into DNA amino acid sequences, have undergone classification based on the well-known and widely used in literature the R.H. Edwards et al. classification. Results. The analysis of nucleotide and deductive amino acid sequences of the 41 LMP1 amplicons revealed their homology with only three gene variants from the R.H. Edwards et al. classification (1999): 95.8/A (29.3 %; 12/41), Medā€“ (14.6 %; 6/41) and China1 (7.3 %, 3/41).Ā Such variants of LMP1 as Alaskan, Med+, ChinŠ°2, China3 and NC, were not found. Among the LMP1 samples of Tatar origin in 20 cases (48.8 %), the composition of the mutations found did not allow them to be assigned to any of the oncogene variants listed above. Out of this number, in 7 (17.1 %) cases a mono group of LMP1 samples was found, differing not only from representatives of the Slavs, inhabitants of the European part of Russia, but also from other Kazan samples, and was designated as LMP1-TatK. The remaining 13 samples of LMP1 (31.7 %), not belonging to any of the known classifications, formed the group designated by us as an LMP1 group beside the classification (LMP1BC). Conclusion. Continuation of the study of the molecular-biological and functional properties of LMP1 in TatK and BC groups, which constitute 48.8 % of the number of gene samples studied, and an analysis of the peculiarities of the ethnic Tatar genotype, will probably help to clarify whether certain EBV strains influence morbidity and mortality in Tatar population with malignant neoplasms, which include EBVassociated cases

    The NP9 protein encoded by the human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K(HML-2) negatively regulates gene activation of the Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2).

    Full text link
    Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human tumour virus that efficiently growth-transforms primary human B-lymphocytes in vitro. The viral nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2) is essential for immortalisation of B-cells and stimulates viral and cellular gene expression through interaction with DNA-bound transcription factors. Like its cellular homologue Notch, it associates with the DNA-bound repressor RBPJκ (CSL/CBF1) thereby converting RBPJκ into the active state. For instance, both EBNA2 and Notch activate the cellular HES1 promoter. In EBV-transformed lymphocytes, the RNA of the NP9 protein encoded by human endogenous retrovirus HERV-K(HML-2) Type 1 is strongly up-regulated. The NP9 protein is detectable both in EBV-positive Raji cells, a Burkitt's lymphoma cell line, and in IB4, an EBV-transformed human lymphoblastoid cell line. NP9 binds to LNX that forms a complex with the Notch regulator Numb. Therefore, the function of NP9 vis-à-vis Notch and EBNA2 was analysed. Here, we show that NP9 binds to EBNA2 and negatively affects the EBNA2-mediated activation of the viral C- and LMP2A promoters. In contrast, NP9 did neither interfere in the activation of the HES1 promoter by Notch nor the induction of the viral LMP1 promoter by EBNA2. In an electrophoretic mobility shift analysis, NP9 reduced the binding of EBNA2 to DNA-bound RBPJκ by about 50%. The down-regulation of EBNA2-activity by NP9 might represent a cellular defence mechanism against viral infection or could, alternatively, represent an adaptation of the virus to prevent excessive viral protein production that might otherwise be harmful for the infected cell

    Hepitopes: A live interactive database of HLA class I epitopes in hepatitis B virus

    Full text link
    Increased clinical and scientific scrutiny is being applied to hepatitis B virus (HBV), with focus on the development of new therapeutic approaches, ultimately aiming for cure. Defining the optimum natural CD8+ T cell immune responses that arise in HBV, mediated by HLA class I epitope presentation, may help to inform novel immunotherapeutic strategies. Therefore, we have set out to develop a comprehensive database of these epitopes in HBV, coined ā€˜Hepitopesā€™. This undertaking has its foundations in a systematic literature review to identify the sites and sequences of all published class I epitopes in HBV. We also collected information regarding the methods used to define each epitope, and any reported associations between an immune response to this epitope and disease outcome. The results of this search have been collated into a new open-access interactive database that is available at http://www.expmedndm.ox.ac.uk/hepitopes. Over time, we will continue to refine and update this resource, as well as inviting contributions from others in the field to support its development. This unique new database is an important foundation for ongoing investigations into the nature and impact of the CD8+ T cell response to HBV
    corecore