3 research outputs found
Social Pedagogy: An Approach Without Fixed Recipes
A historical and theoretical reconstruction of the specificity and peculiarity of the discipline of social pedagogy, as it has developed in Denmark. Social pedagogy takes its departure from the idea that the individual person and the community are complementary but at the same time opposed to each other, so the task of social pedagogy is rebalancing the dynamics between the two. Social pedagogy is also characterised as a discipline with three dimensions: a practical dimension, a theoretical dimension and a professional dimension. The
professional’s task is neither to apply theory in practice nor to uphold the usual practice; it is to mediate between theory and practice. The specificity of the discipline gives rise to particular challenges and
dilemmas that theorists make understandable and transparent and practitioners have to deal with. A big challenge for social pedagogy is the quest for evidence-based methods that overrides the specificity of the
social pedagogical approach. Balancing different forms of knowledge implies that programmes and methods are used as inspiration that can be contained in a social pedagogical approach
Social pedagogical perspectives on fidelity to a manual: Professional principles and dilemmas in everyday expertise
Manualised interventions, in use across the UK for decades and increasingly in use in Denmark, aim
to support change through professional practitioners following detailed prescriptions of what they must
do to affect a particular change in the target group. Social pedagogy, a strong professional tradition in
Denmark and an emerging profession in the UK, takes an approach that responds to the individual’s
experience of the immediate situation, seeks to nurture relational opportunities and to empower people
to fully participate in their lives and society. Harbo’s research reveals that this approach can be at odds
with manualised interventions for a variety of reasons. A social pedagogically informed programme
has been developed in London that uses a clear ethical stance and key theories as its foundation, and
upon which structures have been developed, but no manual. This article explores the use of these
manualised and non-manualised interventions in Denmark and the UK and the roles of social pedagogues
in supporting change through programmatic interventions. Harbo’s doctoral research findings on practice surrounding the highly prescriptive manual Aggression Replacement Training in Denmark
(Harbo, 2019) is explored alongside Kemp’s reflections on the social pedagogically informed Family
Learning Intervention Programme in England, examining the tensions and synergies that emerge around
each programme when they meet reality and the individual characteristics of day-to-day situations.
The perspectives presented emerge from practice research and reflections, and as such are based in an
experiential research tradition. Finally, we draw together our learning and openings for further research
and policy development