3 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Acute ischaemic stroke in Listeria monocytogenes meningoencephalitis.
Listeria monocytogenes is the third most frequent cause of bacterial meningitis and has a predilection for elderly patients and the immunosuppressed. A small number of patients with Listeria monocytogenes meningoencephalitis have previously been reported to experience stroke-like symptoms that were attributed to microabscess formation and the mass effect of collections of infection in the brain. These infections led to temporary neurological deficits that resolved with antimicrobial treatment, rather than to true strokes with permanent neurological deficits. This report discusses the case of an 80- year-old male, who was immunosuppressed with mesalazine for the treatment of Crohn's disease, and who went on to develop Listeria monocytogenes meningoencephalitis. 1 week into his admission, for antibiotic therapy, the patient began to experience new onset right upper limb weakness, nystagmus and past pointing. These symptoms were initially thought to be a complication of the infection. However, subsequent diffusion-weighted MRI revealed that the patient had more likely suffered an acute ischaemic event and a contrast-enhanced MRI performed later could not detect any abscess or large infective focus in a region that could explain the symptoms. This case report highlights the fact that ischaemic and infective pathologists may coexist in immunosuppressed Listeria patients and that clinical signs and symptoms should guide the use of appropriate imaging modalities such as MRI to clarify differentials so that ischaemia is not mistaken for the more common stroke mimic caused by infection in these patients
Recommended from our members
Diabetes mellitus and obesity among South Asians with ischaemic stroke across three countries
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus and central obesity are more common among South Asian populations than among white British people. This study explores the differences in diabetes and obesity in South Asians with stroke living in the UK, India and Qatar compared with white British stroke patients. METHODS: The study included the UK, Indian and Qatari arms of the ongoing large Bio-Repository of DNA in Stroke (BRAINS) international prospective hospital-based study for South Asian stroke. BRAINS includes 4580 South Asian and white British recruits from UK, Indian and Qatar sites with first-ever ischemic stroke. RESULTS: The study population comprises 1751 white British (WB) UK residents, 1165 British South Asians (BSA), 1096 South Asians in India (ISA), and 568 South Asians in Qatar (QSA). ISA, BSA and QSA South Asians suffered from higher prevalence of diabetes compared to WB by 14.5% (ISA 95%CI: 18.6-33.0, PCONCLUSION: South Asian ischaemic stroke patients living in Britain and Qatar have a near 3.5-fold risk of diabetes compared to white British stroke patients. Their body composition may partly help explain that increased risk. These findings have important implications for public health policymakers in nations with large South Asian populations.</p
Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2) : a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy
Background: Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence.
Methods: ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362.
Findings: Between Jan 15, 2008, and Dec 31, 2020, 3625 patients in 130 centres were randomly allocated, 1811 to CAS and 1814 to CEA, with good compliance, good medical therapy and a mean 5 years of follow-up. Overall, 1% had disabling stroke or death procedurally (15 allocated to CAS and 18 to CEA) and 2% had non-disabling procedural stroke (48 allocated to CAS and 29 to CEA). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year non-procedural stroke were 2·5% in each group for fatal or disabling stroke, and 5·3% with CAS versus 4·5% with CEA for any stroke (rate ratio [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·86-1·57; p=0·33). Combining RRs for any non-procedural stroke in all CAS versus CEA trials, the RR was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (overall RR 1·11, 95% CI 0·91-1·32; p=0·21).
Interpretation: Serious complications are similarly uncommon after competent CAS and CEA, and the long-term effects of these two carotid artery procedures on fatal or disabling stroke are comparable