2 research outputs found

    Maxillary sinus lift with or without biomaterials in humans: radiographic and histomorphometric evaluation

    Get PDF
    Biomaterials are frequently used for sinus lift procedures at the time of implant installation in the posterior upper jaw. Nevertheless, some authors have reported the possibility of leaving an empty space, in order to exploit the regenerative potential of the residual periosteal and bony walls following the Schneiderian membrane elevation. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic changes and histological characteristics of newly formed bone following sinus lift without any biomaterials or Bio-Oss®. Fifteen patients with edentulousness of the maxillary molar-premolar area and a residual crest thickness < 6 mm, were randomly allocated to a test group (sinus lift without biomaterial) or a control group (with Bio-Oss®). Two submerged Astra Tech implants were placed in the most mesial and distal portion of the augmented area. Six months later, a bone biopsy was harvested in the area between the 2 previously placed fixtures, where a third central implant was placed. Standard radiographies were taken before sinus lift and 6 months later in order to measure and compare the vertical bone changes. The biopsies were processed for ground sectioning. All implants but one case were successful. Radiographically, the basic level of bone tissue in the test group (n=5) was 5 ± 0.86 mm and 3.5 ± 0.57 mm in the control group (n=10); in the test group the bone tissue was increased vertically of 10 ± 2.53 (range 7-13), in the control group 13 ± 1.41 (range 12-14). At histological observation, all samples showed new bone formation without signs of inflammation. Bone remodeling was observed in the apical portion of both groups. Residual particles of biomaterial were embedded in mineralized new bone. Histometric results for the control group were: LB 38.8% ± 8.1, WB 9.2% ± 2.4, BM 30.2% ± 7.5, BO 21.7% ± 8.9; for the test group: LB 54.5% ± 2.1, WB 115.5% ± 6.1 and BM 33.5% ± 6.4. A clinically significant bone increase was achieved both with and without the use of biomaterials. The implants showed similar performances when inserted at sites augmented with or without biomaterials. The success of such procedure might depend on the anatomical conformation of the crest and on the level of surgical experience of the surgeon

    Uncinate process deviation in patients with odontogenic sinusitis: a computed tomographic evaluation

    Get PDF
    The uncinate process of the ethmoidis is one of the anatomic boundaries of osti- omeatal complex. Its relationship with the maxillary sinus ostium makes it the key landmark for endoscopic sinus surgery. Many authors denied a direct role of the uncinate process in the development of sinonasal infections (1). Nevertheless, chronic sinonasal diseases are often accompanied by an uncinate process antero-medialization, most notably in presence of an odontogenic etiology. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze uncinate process anatomy on computed tomographic (CT) scans, defining the association between uncinate process inclination and sinonasal health status. Sinonasal CT examinations of 46 individuals were reviewed, comparing patients without clinical and radiographic signs of sinonasal diseases (Group I), and patients diagnosed with odontogenic sinusitis according to the criteria proposed by Felisati et al. (2)(Group II). Uncinate process inclination was calculated by Radiant Dicom Viewer software, as the angle between the straight line connecting the antero- superior and the postero-inferior part of uncinate process, and the axis of symmetry, passing through sphenoidal rostrum and perpendicular to bizygomatic line. For each patient three axial scans (the most cranial, median, the most caudal), in which uncinate process was clearly detectable, were selected and a mean value was computed. Descriptive statistics of uncinate process inclination were calculated separately in the two groups. In Group I the mean angle was13.18° ± 10.33°with confidence limits (CL) (99%) between 6.21° and 20.15°,in Group II the mean angle was 29.89°±9.56° with CL between 24.44° and 35.34°. From these preliminary results, a marked medial devia tion of uncinate process was identified in odontogenic sinusitis compared to healthy sites. Additional assessments are required to confirm the role of this anatomical varia- tion in the pathogenesis of odontogenic sinusitis
    corecore