Comparison of lidocaine/tetracaine cream and lidocaine/prilocaine cream for local anaesthesia during laser treatment of acne keloidalis nuchae and tattoo removal: Results of two randomized controlled trials

Background: Pain is a common adverse effect of dermatological laser procedures. Currently, no standard topical anaesthetic cream exists for deeper dermal laser procedures. Objectives: To compare the efficacy of lidocaine/tetracaine cream and lidocaine/prilocaine cream in reducing self-reported pain during deeper dermal laser treatment of acne keloidalis nuchae (AKN) and tattoos. Methods: We conducted two randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials with intrapatient, split-lesion designs: study A included patients with AKN (n = 15); study B included patients with black tattoos (n = 15). The primary end point was the patients' self-reported pain on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary objectives were the percentage of patients with adequate pain relief, willingness to pay €25 for the cream that provided the best pain relief and safety of the creams. Results: In both studies, VAS scores were lower for lidocaine/prilocaine cream, with a mean VAS difference in study A of 1·9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·0-2·8] and in study B of 0·6 (95% CI -0·7 to 1·9). In study A, adequate pain relief was achieved in 13% (n = 2) with lidocaine/tetracaine cream vs. 73% (n = 11) with lidocaine/prilocaine cream (P = 0·004), and in study B in 53% (n = 8) vs. 80% (n = 12), respectively (P = 0·289). In study A, 47% (n = 7) were willing to pay an additional €25 vs. 73% (n = 11) in study B. No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Lidocaine/prilocaine cream under plastic occlusion is the preferred topical anaesthetic during painful laser procedures targeting dermal chromophores

Lentigo maligna - anatomic location as a potential risk factor for recurrences after non-surgical treatment

Background: A higher incidence of lentigo maligna (LM) recurrences on the nose was previously observed in our cohort after non-surgical treatment. Objectives: To determine histological parameters that might be related to the previously observed higher incidence of LM recurrences on the nose after non-surgical treatment. Methods: We randomly selected 22 surgical specimens of LM on the nose and 22 on the cheek. Histopathological analysis was performed on haematoxylin and eosin stained and microphthalmia transcription factor immunohistochemically stained slides. The number of pilosebaceous units (PSU) per mm, maximum depth of atypical melanocytes along the skin appendages and maximum depth of the PSU itself were determined. Results: The nose had a significantly higher density of PSU than the cheek. The atypical melanocytes extended deeper along the PSU on the nose with a mean (SD) depth of 1.29 mm (0.48)

Efficacy and tolerability of intralesional bleomycin in dermatology: A systematic review

Bleomycin is widely used as an off-label treatment for various dermatologic indications. However, a much-needed critical appraisal of the currently available evidence is lacking. We therefore evaluated the quality of clinical evidence for the efficacy and safety of intralesional bleomycin treatment for dermatologic indications with the aim to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice. The PubMed, Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched. Two authors independently selected relevant studies according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We assessed the methodologic quality with the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias assessment tool and selected 10 randomized clinical trials and 15 clinical controlled trials. Treatment indications included common warts, nonmelanoma skin cancer, cutaneous metastases, keloid and hypertrophic scars, and hemangioma. Intralesional bleomycin treatment showed significantly higher cure rates for warts compared with other treatments. Local adverse events included erythema, blackening, eschar formation, and superficial ulceration. None of the studies reported systemic adverse events. Methodologic quality of the studies was generally low. Consequently, no firm recommendations can be made for intralesional bleomycin treatment in clinical practice. However, this review suggests that intralesional bleomycin is a successful and well-tolerated treatment for recalcitrant warts