Highlights of the 2021 Brano Heart Failure Forum

Since 2007, the Branislav “Brano” Radovancevic Heart Failure Forum has been held annually to provide a venue for experts to present and discuss “Innovations and New Treatment Strategies in Heart Failure.” Clinicians and researchers gather yearly in a different Eastern European city to discuss the latest in heart failure diagnostics and therapeutics. The forum was postponed in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic and then resumed in September of 2021 in Graz, Austria. It was attended by over 75 faculty from 13 countries. Due to the ongoing pandemic, 13 presentations were given virtually. Throughout the forum, 17 separate sessions focused on challenges and solutions related to mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation. In this special issue of The VAD Journal, a summary of conference highlights from available presentations is presented

Highlights of the 2022 Brano Heart Failure Forum: Part Two

Since 2007, the Branislav “Brano” Radovancevic Heart Failure Forum (BHFF) has been held annually to provide a venue for experts to present and discuss “Innovations and New Treatment Strategies in Heart Failure.” Clinicians and researchers gather yearly in a different Eastern European city to discuss the latest in heart failure diagnostics and therapeutics. The 2022 BHFF forum was held on the 6th thru 8th of September 2022 in Trieste, Italy. It was attended by over 94 faculty from 14 countries. In addition, participation through online streaming was available. Throughout the forum, 17 sessions focused on challenges and solutions related to mechanical circulatory support (MCS) and heart transplantation. The second portion of conference highlights from available presentations is presented herein

Highlights of the 2022 Brano Heart Failure Forum: Part One

Since 2007, the Branislav “Brano” Radovancevic Heart Failure Forum (BHFF) has been held annually to provide a venue for experts to present and discuss “Innovations and New Treatment Strategies in Heart Failure.” Clinicians and researchers gather yearly in a different Eastern European city to discuss the latest in heart failure diagnostics and therapeutics. The 2022 BHHF forum was held on the 6th thru 8th of September 2022 in Trieste, Italy. It was attended by over 94 faculty from 14 countries. In addition, participation through online streaming was available. Throughout the forum, 17 sessions focused on challenges and solutions related to mechanical circulatory support and heart transplantation. This special issue of The VAD Journal presents a summary of conference highlights from available presentations

Houston SHOCK: A Practical Scoring System Incorporating Cardiogenic Shock Dynamic Changes

Cardiogenic shock has an unacceptably high mortality rate and additional tools are needed to improve outcomes. The Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock severity classification has provided a unified definition of shock severity that has proven to be reproducible and predictive of survival. However, cardiogenic shock assessment goes beyond standardizing its severity, and a uniform and practical approach to comprehensive assessment that may guide therapy in a dynamic state is currently lacking. Since cardiogenic shock is a rapidly evolving pathophysiological catastrophe, we propose a new assessment tool – the Houston SHOCK Score – which incorporates dynamic changes. The acronym SHOCK can be used to emphasize five key aspects of patients in cardiogenic shock: Severity, Hemodynamics, Onset, Causes, and Kinetics. We believe this tool provides physicians with vital information that will facilitate appropriate care by incorporating dynamic changes in the patient’s profile

A Case of Inferior Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Ventricular Septal Rupture Leading to Cardiogenic Shock: Tandem Heart to the Rescue!

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but life-threatening complication of acute myocardial infarction. We present a case of VSR-related refractory cardiogenic shock that was successfully managed with TandemHeart® followed by surgical repair

Off-pump HeartMate II Exchange in a Patient with Severe Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Case Report

Thrombosis of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) pumps is a serious complication that often requires exchange of the device. A 66-year-old man with severe peripheral vascular disease presented with pump thrombosis of the HeartMate II (HMII) LVAD 1.5 years after implantation. The HMII was exchanged to another HMII through a subcostal incision and without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. For safety, the patient was prepared for cardiopulmonary bypass by exposing the right subclavian artery and insertion of a 5 FR cannula in the left common femoral vein. The pump was exchanged through a subcostal incision made over the LVAD pump pocket perpendicular to the costal margin. After deairing the pump and graft, LVAD support was resumed, postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged from the hospital four days later. Re-thrombosis, stroke, and right heart failure are frequent complications after LVAD exchange. Exchange through a subcostal incision with cardiopulmonary bypass backup appears to be safe

Improved outcomes in the treatment of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect with percutaneous TandemHeart left ventricular mechanical circulatory support

Background Post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal defect (VSD) is associated with 40% - 50% of peri-procedural mortalities; however, it is amenable to catheter-based therapies. We retrospectively investigated the impact of state-of-the-art bridging percutaneous left ventricular mechanical circulatory support (MCS) using the TandemHeart® (TH) ventricular assist device (VAD) on a patient with post-MI VSD. Results From July 2008 to March 2014, 23 patients were referred for treatment of post-MI VSD. Initially, 18/23 patients required MCS; 12 received an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), while 6 received initial TH support. Seven of the IABP patients later required TH support. Catheter-based device VSD closure was performed in 18 of the patients; however, three patients required conversion to conventional open cardiac surgical repair via VSD patch closure due to failure of the catheter-based approach. Five patients with TH underwent planned open cardiac surgical repair due to an anticipated lack of suitability for catheter-based treatment. Results revealed that delayed closure after MI correlated with improved survival. Overall, 30-day and 6-month survival rates were 83% (19/23) and 70% (16/23), respectively. Conclusions Further, Qp/Qs ratios of \u3c2.4 correlated with successful percutaneous VSD repair, and this assessment should be further explored as an assessment to inform clinical judgment in patients with post-MI VSD treatment

Adverse Events in Continuous-Flow LVAD Recipients: Gastrointestinal Bleeding is Still Notable?

Background: The etiology and risk factors associated with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are currently unknown. Therefore, we sought to assess the risk factors for GIB in these patients. Design and Methods: This was a retrospective, non-randomized, non-controlled study at a single center. Between 2012 and 2014, 65 men and 6 women (mean age = 55 ± 12 years) underwent CF-LVAD implantation at our institution. Overall, 23.9% of patients (17/71) had at least one GIB episode. Endoscopy confirmed GIB in 13/17. Arteriovenous malformation was the major GIB source in 8/13 (61%). There was no significant difference in incidence of GIB with regard to INTERMACS profile, blood type, or device type—HeartWare vs. HeartMateII. All our patients with GIB were men, most had hyperlipidemia, and most likely had ischemic cardiomyopathy (65%) and peripheral vascular disease (24%). The only significant risk factor for GIB was chronic kidney disease (odds ratio= 3.95; 95% confidence interval of 1.21 to 12.84; p=0.02). At the time of the first GIB, mean hemoglobin was 7.38 ± 1.06 g/dl, international normalized ratio was 2.08 ± 0.69 IU, and mean arterial pressure was 75 ± 12 mmHg. Ten patients (59%) required hospital admission for treatment. Conclusion: In our patients GIB was often a single event and often occurred within first month after implantation. Prevention strategies should be focused on this vulnerable period, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease