Management of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial hemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is considered a potentially severe complication of oral anticoagulants (OACs) and antiplatelet therapy (APT). Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who survived ICH present both an increased ischemic and bleeding risk. Due to its lethality, initiating or reinitiating OACs in ICH survivors with AF is challenging. Since ICH recurrence may be life-threatening, patients who experience an ICH are often not treated with OACs, and thus remain at a higher risk of thromboembolic events. It is worthy of mention that subjects with a recent ICH and AF have been scarcely enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ischemic stroke risk management in AF. Nevertheless, in observational studies, stroke incidence and mortality of patients with AF who survived ICH had been shown to be significantly reduced among those treated with OACs. However, the risk of hemorrhagic events, including recurrent ICH, was not necessarily increased, especially in patients with post-traumatic ICH. The optimal timing of anticoagulation initiation or restarting after an ICH in AF patients is also largely debated. Finally, the left atrial appendage occlusion option should be evaluated in AF patients with a very high risk of recurrent ICH. Overall, an interdisciplinary unit consisting of cardiologists, neurologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, patients, and their families should be involved in management decisions. According to available evidence, this review outlines the most appropriate anticoagulation strategies after an ICH that should be adopted to treat this neglected subset of patients

A Therapeutic Pathway in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes: Proposal for Optimization

There is uncertainty in cardiologists' attitudes for prolonging dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with ticagrelor 60 mg beyond 12 months in post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. We aimed at characterizing the Italian cardiologists' perceptions and needs in the management of such patients. Two consecutive questionnaires were proposed between June and November 2021, and compiled by 122 and 87 Cardiologists, respectively. Agreement among cardiologists was defined as either a >70% frequency of concordant responses relative to total respondents or following the Delphi method as developed by the RAND Corporation. An agreement was reached on the indication of ticagrelor as the first choice P2Y12 inhibitor in MI patients, irrespective of the presentation [ST elevation MI (STEMI), 72%, vs. non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI), 71%] or the management [invasive vs. conservative (75%)]. A consensus was also achieved on the possibility to consider a patient suitable for long-term DAPT with ticagrelor 60 mg even in case of another P2Y12 inhibitor used in the first year after the acute event (74, 85%). To define ischemic and bleeding risks, a consensus was reached on the utilization of one or more scores (87, 71%)

Drug eluting stent and coronary chronic total occlusions

Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is a common finding on diagnostic coronary angiography and represents one of the most challenging lesion subset in interventional cardiology. The introduction of dedicated guidewires and the development of new techniques have led to improve the success rate in the crossing of CTO lesion while the use of bare metal stent first, and, then, the use of drug eluting stent (DES) have significantly reduced the occurrence of restenosis and the need for target lesion revascularization in short and mid-term follow-up after CTO recanalization. However, new unsolved issues about the use of DES in CTO, that might impact long-term outcome, are emerging. The aim of this article is to review the current stage of knowledge on the application of stents in the treatment of CTO, with a particular attention to DES use and to DES-related challenges

New paradigm for the management of cardio-nephro-metabolic syndrome: multidisciplinary approach and role of telemedicine

Heart failure (HF), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are some of the most important health problems of this century, and these three conditions often coexist, one worsening the prognosis of the other two. No disease is more important than the others in the composition of risk, which is significantly increased by their overlap. Thus, it would be more appropriate to refer to this cluster as cardio-nephro-metabolic syndrome. The aim of this review is to promote the development of an integrated multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of HF, T2DM and CKD in a perspective of paradigm shift from an individual management among different specialists to a shared one. Nowadays, this is achievable thanks to telemedicine and optimized therapy consisting in the new drugs with pleiotropic effect available today. The need is to have technological solutions, which also include telemedicine, for the management of patients affected by all three diseases to consider their fragility, sometimes due to a wrong, partial, or incomplete treatment. Multicentric, multidisciplinary trials on cardio-nephro-metabolic syndrome and new telemedicine/telemonitoring technologies could help place the chronic and fragile patient at the center of such multidimensionally integrated care

A meta-analysis of first-generation drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents for coronary chronic total occlusion: effect of length of follow-up on clinical outcome

N/