53 research outputs found

    Explaining the RKR_{K} and RD()R_{D^{(*)}} anomalies with vector leptoquarks

    Full text link
    Recently the BB factories BaBar and Belle as well as the LHCb experiment have reported several anomalies in the semileptonic BB meson decays such as RKR_{K} and RD()R_{D^{(*)}} etc. We investigate these deviations by considering the vector leptoquarks relevant for both bsl+lb \to s l^+ l^- and bclνˉlb \to c l \bar \nu_l transitions. The leptoquark parameter space is constrained by using the experimentally measured branching ratios of Bsl+lB_s \to l^+ l^-, BˉXsl+l(ννˉ)\bar B \to X_s l^+ l^- (\nu \bar \nu) and Bu+l+νlB_u^+ \to l^+ \nu_l processes. Using the constrained leptoquark couplings, we compute the branching ratios, forward-backward asymmetries, τ\tau and DD^* polarization parameters in the BˉD()lνˉl\bar B \to D^{(*)} l \bar \nu_l processes. We find that the vector leptoquarks can explain both RD()R_{D^{(*)}} and RKR_K anomalies simultaneously. Furthermore, we study the rare leptonic Bu,clνˉB_{u, c}^* \to l \bar\nu decay processes in this model.Comment: 33 pages, 14 figures, typos correcte

    Perturbative Bottom-up Approach for Neutrino Mass Matrix in Light of Large \theta_{13} and Role of Lightest Neutrino Mass

    Full text link
    We discuss the role of lightest neutrino mass (m_0) in the neutrino mass matrix, defined in a flavor basis, through a bottom-up approach using the current neutrino oscillation data. We find that if m_0 < 10^{-3} eV, then the deviation \delta M_\nu in the neutrino mass matrix from a tree-level, say tribimaximal neutrino mass matrix, does not depend on m_0. As a result \delta M_\nu's are exactly predicted in terms of the experimentally determined quantities such as solar and atmospheric mass squared differences and the mixing angles. On the other hand for m_0 \gsim 10^{-3} eV, \delta M_\nu strongly depends on m_0 and hence can not be determined within the knowledge of oscillation parameters alone. In this limit, we provide an exponential parameterization for \delta M_\nu for all values of m_0 such that it can factorize the m_0 dependency of \delta M_\nu from rest of the oscillation parameters. This helps us in finding \delta M_\nu as a function of the solar and atmospheric mass squared differences and the mixing angles for all values of m_0. We use this information to build up a model of neutrino masses and mixings in a top-down scenario which can predict large \theta_{13} perturbatively.Comment: 26 pages, 42 eps figures, revtex (references are added, more discussions are added in section-III

    Implications of light Z′ on semileptonic B(Bs)→T{K2*(1430)(f2′(1525))}ℓ+ℓ− decays at large recoil

    Get PDF
    We probe the rare semileptonic decays B(s)→K2∗(1430)(f2′(1525))+- proceeding via b→s transition in the presence of a light Z′ boson. We employ the presence of an additional vector-type interaction and constrain the new physics coupling parameter using the existing experimental measurements on RK and RK∗ observables. To understand the sensitivity of the new physics coupling, we investigate the impact of this coupling on various physical observables such as differential branching ratio, the forward-backward asymmetry, the lepton polarization asymmetry, the angular observable P5′, and the lepton universality parameters such as the ratio of the branching ratio Rf2′(K2∗) and some important Q parameters of B(s)→K2∗(1430)(f2′(1525))+- processes at large recoil. We find some noticeable differences of the observables in the presence of light Z′ contribution. © 2021 authors. Published by the American Physical Society

    Delving into the Bs B_s \to \ell \ell^{\prime}, B(s)(K(),ϕ,f2,K2)B_{(s)} \to (K^{(*)}, \phi, f_2^{\prime}, K_2^*) \ell \ell ^{\prime} processes

    Full text link
    To shed light on the indirect search for new physics beyond the standard model, the long standing discrepancies between the theory and experiment mediated by FCNC bsb\to s \ell \ell quark level transitions set an ideal testing ground. Though the very recent measurements of RKR_K and RKR_{K^*} are consistent with the standard model, still the excitements remain on the measurements of LHCb experiment with the observables B(Bsϕμ+μ)\mathcal{B} (B_s \to \phi \mu ^+ \mu ^-) which has deviations at the level of 3.6σ3.6 \sigma. Additionally, standard deviation of 3.3σ\sim 3.3 \sigma and 1.2σ1.2 \sigma, respectively for P5P_5^{\prime} in BKμ+μB \to K^* \mu ^+ \mu ^- and the branching ratio in Bsμ+μB_s \to \mu^+ \mu^- processes are observed. Inspired by these discrepancies, we work out the constraints on the new physics coupling parameters in the presence of a non-universal ZZ' model. We then probe the exclusive leptonic decay channels Bs B_s \to \ell \ell^{\prime}, B(s)(K(),ϕ,f2,K2)B_{(s)} \to (K^{(*)}, \phi, f_2^{\prime}, K_2^*) \ell \ell ^{\prime} induced by the neutral current transition bsb\to s \ell \ell^{\prime}. We find that the q2q^2 variation of the observables, such as, branching ratio, forward-backward asymmetry, lepton polarization asymmetry, and the very sensible observable, so called non-universality observables for LFV decays display the sensitivity of new physics. In this analysis. we estimate above mentioned observables that could shed light on the window of new physics in the near future.Comment: I have updated the title of the paper. Also I have added few references and changed the title of the image

    Search for lepton-flavor-violating tau-lepton decays to ℓγ at Belle

    Get PDF
    Charged lepton flavor violation is forbidden in the Standard Model but possible in several new physics scenarios. In many of these models, the radiative decays τ± → ℓ±γ (ℓ = e, μ) are predicted to have a sizeable probability, making them particularly interesting channels to search at various experiments. An updated search via τ± → ℓ±γ using full data of the Belle experiment, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 988 fb−1, is reported for charged lepton flavor violation. No significant excess over background predictions from the Standard Model is observed, and the upper limits on the branching fractions, B(τ± → μ±γ) ≤ 4.2 × 10−8 and B(τ± → e±γ) ≤ 5.6 × 10−8, are set at 90% confidence level. [Figure not available: see fulltext.]. © 2021, The Author(s)

    An improved search for the electric dipole moment of the τ lepton

    Get PDF
    We report a measurement of the electric dipole moment of the τ lepton (dτ) using an 833 fb−1 data sample collected near the Υ(4S) resonance, with the Belle detector at the KEKB asymmetric-energy e+e− collider. Using an optimal observable method, we obtain the real and imaginary parts of dτ as Re(dτ) = (−0.62 ± 0.63) × 10−17ecm and Im(dτ) = (−0.40 ± 0.32) × 10−17ecm, respectively. These results are consistent with null electric dipole moment at the present level of experimental sensitivity and improve the sensitivity by about a factor of three. [Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2022, The Author(s)

    Measurement of branching fractions and search for CP violation in D 0 → π + π − η, D 0 → K + K − η, and D 0 → ϕη at Belle

    Get PDF
    We measure the branching fractions and CP asymmetries for the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D0 → π+π−η, D0 → K+K−η, and D0 → ϕη, using 980 fb−1 of data from the Belle experiment at the KEKB e+e− collider. We obtainB(D0→π+π−η)=[1.22±0.02(stat)±0.02(syst)±0.03(Bref)]×10−3,B(D0→K+K−η)=[1.80−0.06+0.07(stat)±0.04(syst)±0.05(Bref)]×10−4,B(D0→ϕη)=[1.84±0.09(stat)±0.06(syst)±0.05(Bref)]×10−4, where the third uncertainty (Bref) is from the uncertainty in the branching fraction of the reference mode D0 → K−π+η. The color-suppressed decay D0 → ϕη is observed for the first time, with very high significance. The results for the CP asymmetries areACP(D0π+π−η)=[0.9±1.2(stat)±0.5(syst)]%,ACP(D0→K+K−η)=[−1.4±3.3(stat)±1.1(syst)]%,ACP(D0→ϕη)=[−1.9±4.4(stat)±0.6(syst)]%. The results for D0 → π+π−η are a significant improvement over previous results. The branching fraction and ACP results for D0 → K+K−η, and the ACP result for D0 → ϕη, are the first such measurements. No evidence for CP violation is found in any of these decays. [Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2021, The Author(s)
    corecore