Childhood maltreatment and intimate partner violence in dissociative disorder patients

Background: Childhood maltreatment (CM) is a risk factor for subsequent intimate partner violence (IPV) in adulthood, with high rates of retrospectively reported CM among IPV victims and perpetrators. A theorized mechanism of the link between CM and IPV is dissociation. Dissociation may allow perpetrators of violence to remain emotionally distant from their behavior and minimize empathy toward those they victimize, enabling them to commit acts of violence similar to their own experiences. Indeed, elevated rates of dissociation and dissociative disorders (DD) have been found among IPV survivors and perpetrators. In addition, in pilot studies, DD clinicians have reported high levels of violent behavior among DD patients. Objective: The present study investigates IPV among DD patients with Dissociative Identity Disorder and Dissociative Disorder Not Otherwise Specified, a group with CM rates of 80–95% and severe dissociative symptoms. Methods: DD clinicians reported on rates of CM and IPV among 275 DD patients in outpatient treatment. DD patients also completed a self-report measure of dissociation. Analyses assessed the associations between CM typologies and IPV, as well as trait dissociation and IPV. Results: Physical and emotional child abuse were associated with physical IPV, and childhood witnessing of domestic violence (DV) and childhood neglect were associated with emotional IPV. Conclusions: The present study is the first to provide empirical support for a possible CM to adult IPV developmental trajectory among DD patients. Future research is needed to better understand the link between CM and IPV among those with trauma and DD

Measuring the understanding of sentences by hearing-impaired children: comparison with connected discourse ratings

Measuring the understanding of connected speech by hearing-impaired children is desirable if an appropriate rehabilitative or special educational program is to be implemented or monitored. This study was undertaken to explore the potential of a Cantonese version of the Helen sentence test as a measure of understanding connected speech by a group of 54 mildly to profoundly hearing-impaired children, and to compare the results from this sentence test with those achieved by the same children on a connected discourse lest. The effects of two different hearing aid frequency responses and two noise conditions on the results from both tests were also examined. Findings from the present study revealed that the Helen sentence test could be successfully adapted For use with Cantonese-speaking hearing-impaired children in Hong Kong. When compared to the connected discourse test, the modified Helen test produced significantly higher scores and was more sensitive to changes in noise level, especially for the severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children