11 research outputs found

    Actical Accelerometry Cut-points for Quantifying Levels of Exertion in Overweight Adults

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study was to develop Actical count cut-points for overweight adults that correspond to moderate and vigorous intensity exercise. The standard definitions of moderate (3 METS) and vigorous (6 METS) were used. Cut-points in overweight subjects (OW) were also compared to cut-points in normal weight (NW) subjects. Thirty overweight (BMI >25 kg/m) male and female adults completed a progressive submaximal exercise session on a treadmill while oxygen uptake was measured. The activity count cut-point derived from ROC curves for moderate intensity was 1839 for OW and 1994 for NW and cut-points for vigorous intensity were 3900 for OW and 4381 for NW. Activity count thresholds were greater in the NW compared to the OW subjects at both moderate and vigorous intensities

    Actical Accelerometry Cut-points for Quantifying Levels of Exertion: Comparing Normal and Overweight Adults

    Get PDF
    Int J Exerc Sci 5(2) : 170-182, 2012. Weight, body fatness and ambulatory pattern all have the potential to affect accelerometer output and cause differences in output between overweight and normal-weight adults. The purpose of this study was to determine if Actical (Philips Respironics, Bend, OR) activity count cut-points for moderate and vigorous intensity exercise are different for overweight adults compared to normal-weight adults. Overweight adults with BMI \u3e25 kg/m² (n=29) and Normal-Weight adults (n=25) walked at 3.2 and 4.8 km∙h-1 and ran at 6.4 km∙h-1 on a treadmill while simultaneously wearing an Actical accelerometer and obtaining measurements of oxygen uptake. Counts per minute (counts∙min-1) were determined at 3 METS (moderate) and 6 METS (vigorous) using ROC curves. The counts∙min-1 at 3 METs was 1726 and 1923 counts∙min-1 for Overweight and Normal-Weight groups, respectively. The cut-points at 6 METs were 4117 and 4032 counts∙min-1 for Overweight and Normal-Weight groups, respectively. The differences between groups were not statistically significant (p\u3e0.73 for both). Correlations between BMI and counts∙min-1 were not significant (p\u3e0.05) at any speed for the Normal-Weight group but were significant at 3.2 and 4.8 km∙h-1 for the Overweight group. Although there appears to be some relationship between activity counts∙min-1 and BMI, the results suggest that similar cut-points may be used for normal weight and overweight adults. However, the greater variability in counts at each speed and lower ROC curve areas for overweight adults suggest that it is harder to classify the activity intensity of overweight subjects compared to normal weight subjects

    Physical Functioning, Physical Activity, and Variability in Gait Performance during the Six-Minute Walk Test

    No full text
    Instrumenting the six-minute walk test (6MWT) adds information about gait quality and insight into fall risk. Being physically active and preserving multi-directional stepping abilities are also important for fall risk reduction. This analysis investigated the relationship of gait quality during the 6MWT with physical functioning and physical activity. Twenty-one veterans (62.2 ± 6.4 years) completed the four square step test (FSST) multi-directional stepping assessment, a gait speed assessment, health questionnaires, and the accelerometer-instrumented 6MWT. An activity monitor worn at home captured free-living physical activity. Gait measures were not significantly different between minutes of the 6MWT. However, participants with greater increases in stride time (ρ = −0.594, p p p p < 0.05) during the 6MWT required more time to complete the FSST. Participants needing at least 15 s to complete the FSST meaningfully differed from those completing the FSST more quickly on all gait measures studied. Instrumenting the 6MWT helps detect ranges of gait performance and provides insight into functional limitations missed with uninstrumented administration. Established FSST cut points identify aging adults with poorer gait quality

    Should Structured Exercise Be Promoted As a Model of Care? Dissemination of the Department of Veterans Affairs Gerofit Program

    No full text
    Exercise provides a wide range of health‐promoting benefits, but support is limited for clinical programs that use exercise as a means of health promotion. This stands in contrast to restorative or rehabilitative exercise, which is considered an essential medical service. We propose that there is a place for ongoing, structured wellness and health promotion programs, with exercise as the primary therapeutic focus. Such programs have long‐lasting health benefits, are easily implementable, and are associated with high levels of participant satisfaction. We describe the dissemination and implementation of a long‐standing exercise and health promotion program, Gerofit, for which significant gains in physical function that have been maintained over 5 years of follow‐up, improvements in well‐being, and a 10‐year 25% survival benefit among program adherents have been documented. The program has been replicated at 6 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. The pooled characteristics of enrolled participants (n = 691) demonstrate substantial baseline functional impairment (usual gait speed 1.05 ± 0.3 m/s, 8‐foot up and go 8.7 ± 6.7 seconds, 30‐second chair stands 10.7 ± 5.1, 6‐minute walk distance 404.31 ± 141.9 m), highlighting the need for such programs. Change scores over baseline for 3, 6, and 12 months of follow‐up are clinically and statistically significant (P < .05 all measures) and replicate findings from the parent program. Patient satisfaction ratings of high ranged from 88% to 94%. We describe the implementation process and present 1‐year outcomes. We suggest that such programs be considered essential elements of healthcare systems
    corecore