4 research outputs found
Disentangling the impact of COVID-19 infection on clinical outcomes and preventive strategies in older persons: An Italian perspective
Italy was one of the first western countries to embrace the first wave of COVID-19 and undergo detrimental outcomes in older adults in different clinical settings, especially in those with comorbidity and frailty. In addition, older nursing home (NH) residents had significantly higher mortality rates most likely due to the increased susceptibility of infection due to combined physical vulnerability and risks linked to the NH living environment itself. Different reports throughout Italy have rapidly highlighted selected outcomes related to COVID-19 in older patients being treated in acute and long-term care (LTC) settings. However, the majority of these studies are single center studies. Thus, it remains fundamental to collect large data from prospective based-population studies in order to identify preventive and therapeutic COVID-19 risk/protective factors correlated with COVID-19 health status outcomes. In this commentary paper, we will discuss different Italian reports according to clinical settings and highlight the importance of GeroCovid Observational and GeroCovid Vax, two large population based prospective studies in Italy
Diabetes mellitus Affects Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Older Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities: Data from the GeroCovid Vax Study
 Â
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Type 2 Diabetes mellitus may affect the humoral immune response following vaccinations, but data concerning COVID-19 vaccines are scarce. We evaluated the impact of diabetes mellitus on antibody response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in older long-term care facilities (LTCF) residents and tested for differences according to anti-diabetic treatment.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 555 older LTCF residents participating in the GeroCovid Vax study were included for this analysis. SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S Immunoglobulin G (anti-S-IgG) concentrations using chemiluminescent assays were tested before the first dose and after 2- and 6-months. The impact of diabetes on anti-S-IgG levels was evaluated using linear mixed models, which included the interaction between time and the presence of diabetes. A second model considered also diabetes treatment: no insulin therapy (including dietary only or use of oral anti-diabetic agents) and insulin therapy (alone or in combination with oral anti-diabetic agents).
RESULTS: The sample's mean age was 82.1 years, 68.1% were women and 25.2% were diabetic. In linear mixed models, the presence of diabetes mellitus was associated with lower anti-S-IgG levels 2 (β=-0.20, 95%CI:-0.34,-0.06) and 6 months (β=-0.22, 95%CI:-0.37,-0.07) after the first vaccine dose. Compared to those without diabetes, diabetic residents not using insulin had lower IgG levels at 2- and 6-month assessments (β=-0.24, 95%CI:-0.43,-0.05, and β=-0.30, 95%CI:-0.50,-0.10, respectively), while no differences were observed for those under insulin.Â
CONCLUSION: Older LTCF residents with diabetes tended to have weaker antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination. Insulin treatment might buffer this effect and establish a humoral immunity similar to non-diabetic individuals.</p
Diabetes Affects Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Older Residents of Long-term Care Facilities: Data From the GeroCovid Vax Study
Objective: Type 2 diabetes may affect the humoral immune response after vaccination, but data concerning coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) vaccines are scarce. We evaluated the impact of diabetes on antibody response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in older residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) and tested for differences according to antidiabetic treatment. Research design and methods: For this analysis, 555 older residents of LTCFs participating in the GeroCovid Vax study were included. SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S immunoglobulin G (anti-S IgG) concentrations using chemiluminescent assays were tested before the first dose and after 2 and 6 months. The impact of diabetes on anti-S IgG levels was evaluated using linear mixed models, which included the interaction between time and presence of diabetes. A second model also considered diabetes treatment: no insulin therapy (including dietary only or use of oral antidiabetic agents) and insulin therapy (alone or in combination with oral antidiabetic agents). Results: The mean age of the sample was 82.1 years, 68.1% were women, and 25.2% had diabetes. In linear mixed models, presence of diabetes was associated with lower anti-S IgG levels at 2 (β = -0.20; 95% CI -0.34, -0.06) and 6 months (β = -0.22; 95% CI -0.37, -0.07) after the first vaccine dose. Compared with those without diabetes, residents with diabetes not using insulin had lower IgG levels at 2- and 6-month assessments (β = -0.24; 95% CI -0.43, -0.05 and β = -0.30; 95% CI -0.50, -0.10, respectively), whereas no differences were observed for those using insulin. Conclusions: Older residents of LTCFs with diabetes tended to have weaker antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination. Insulin treatment might buffer this effect and establish humoral immunity similar to that in individuals without diabetes