The LiberAction Project: Implementation of a Pediatric Liberation Bundle to Screen Delirium, Reduce Benzodiazepine Sedation, and Provide Early Mobilization in a Human Resource-Limited Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Background: Delirium, bed immobilization, and heavy sedation are among the major contributors of pediatric post-intensive care syndrome. Recently, the Society of Critical Care Medicine has proposed the implementation of daily interventions to minimize the incidence of these morbidities and optimize children functional outcomes and quality of life. Unfortunately, these interventions require important clinical and economical efforts which prevent their use in many pediatric intensive care units (PICU). Aim: First, to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a PICU bundle implementation prioritizing delirium screening and treatment, early mobilization (<72 h from PICU admission) and benzodiazepine-limited sedation in a human resource-limited PICU. Second, to evaluate the incidence of delirium and describe the early mobilization practices and sedative drugs used during the pre- and post-implementation periods. Third, to describe the barriers and adverse events encountered during early mobilization. Methods: This observational study was structured in a pre- (15th November 2019-30th June 2020) and post-implementation period (1st July 2020-31st December 2020). All patients admitted in PICU for more than 72 h during the pre and post-implementation period were included in the study. Patients were excluded if early mobilization was contraindicated. During the pre-implementation period, a rehabilitation program including delirium screening and treatment, early mobilization and benzodiazepine-sparing sedation guidelines was developed and all PICU staff trained. During the post-implementation period, delirium screening with the Connell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium scale was implemented at bedside. Early mobilization was performed using a structured tiered protocol and a new sedation protocol, limiting the use of benzodiazepine, was adopted. Results: Two hundred and twenty-five children were enrolled in the study, 137 in the pre-implementation period and 88 in the post-implementation period. Adherence to delirium screening, benzodiazepine-limited sedation and early mobilization was 90.9, 81.1, and 70.4%, respectively. Incidence of delirium was 23% in the post-implementation period. The median cumulative dose of benzodiazepines corrected for the total number of sedation days (mg/kg/sedation days) was significantly lower in the post-implementation period compared with the pre-implementation period: [0.83 (IQR: 0.53-1.31) vs. 0.74 (IQR: 0.55-1.16), p = 0.0001]. The median cumulative doses of fentanyl, remifentanil, and morphine corrected for the total number of sedation days were lower in the post-implementation period, but these differences were not significant. The median number of mobilizations per patient and the duration of each mobilization significantly increased in the post-implementation period [3.00 (IQR: 2.0-4.0) vs. 7.00 (IQR: 3.0-12.0); p = 0.004 and 4 min (IQR: 3.50-4.50) vs. 5.50 min (IQR: 5.25-6.5); p < 0.0001, respectively]. Barriers to early mobilization were: disease severity and bed rest orders (55%), lack of physicians' order (20%), lack of human resources (20%), and lack of adequate devices for patient mobilization (5%). No adverse events related to early mobilization were reported in both periods. Duration of mechanical ventilation and PICU length of stay was significantly lower in the post-implementation period as well as the occurrence of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome. Conclusion: This study showed that the implementation of a PICU liberation bundle prioritizing delirium screening and treatment, benzodiazepine-limited sedation and early mobilization was feasible and safe even in a human resource-limited PICU. Further pediatric studies are needed to evaluate the clinical impact of delirium, benzodiazepine-limited sedation and early mobilization protocols on patients' long-term functional outcomes and on hospital finances

Levosimendan improves hemodynamics and coronary flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction

Background Positive inotropic agents may be associated with increasing myocardial ischemia or malignant arrhythmias. Levosimendan, a new calcium sensitizer, with its little effect on myocardial oxygen demand is better tolerated by patients with acute coronary syndromes. We evaluated the acute effects of levosimendan on hemodynamics and coronary flow velocities in patients with left I ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) for an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods Patients with AMI and LV dysfunction undergoing primary PCI were randomized to intravenous infusion of levosimendan (10 minutes bolus with 12 mu g/kg followed by 0.1 mu g/kg per minute for 24 hours) or placebo, 10 minutes after 14 a primary PCI. Evaluation of hemodynamics and of coronary flow reserve (CFR) were performed at baseline and after bolus. I Results Twenty-six consecutive patients (mean age 57 +/- 5.4 years, 18 males) were included into the study. At baseline, 14 mean values of hemodynamics and coronary flow velocities were comparable between groups. After bolus, patients with levosimendan (n = 12) showed a significant decrease of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (from 24 to 19 mm Hg) and a significant increase of cardiac index (from 1.8 to 2.4 L/m(2) per minute) resulting in a significant decrease of systemic vascular resistance (from 1366 to 1075 [dyne . s]/cm(2)). Moreover, CFR on infarct-related artery and on reference vessel significantly improved in patients treated with levosimendan (from 1.6 to 2.0 and from 2.1 to 2.4, respectively). On the other hand, no statistically significant changes have been observed in the placebo group (n = 14). Conclusions Levosimendan, given intravenously after a PCI procedure in patients with AMI and LV dysfunction, significantly improves hemodynamics and CFR, compared with placebo

Drug self-poisoning in adolescents: A report of 267 cases

Introduction: The current study aims at describing a sample of adolescents admitted to a tertiary referral pediatric hospital for drug self-poisoning and to identify variables that could explain and predict a higher severity of intoxication. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of drug self-poisoning in adolescents admitted to the Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital between January 2014 and June 2022 requiring consultation by the local Pediatric Poison Control Center (PPCC). We reported the type and class of drug ingested and correlated the clinical characteristics of the patients with their Poison Severity Score. Results: The data of 267 patients were reported. Most patients were female (85.8 %), with a median age of 15.8 years at presentation. Half of the patients were symptomatic at admission (44.2 %), and most had at least one psychiatric comorbidity (71.1 %). Most patients were hospitalized (79.6 %), 16.6 % of cases required antidote administration and a minority required intensive care. Most patients received a PSS score of 0 (59.6 %). The most frequently ingested drug was acetaminophen (28.1 %) followed by ibuprofen (10.1 %) and aripiprazole (10.1 %). Antipsychotics as a class were the most abused drugs (33.1 %). The correlation of clinical variables with the PSS showed that older and male patients were more prone to be severely intoxicated. Conclusions: This single-center study identifies the most commonly ingested drugs in a large sample of adolescents with voluntary drug self-poisoning, also showing that older and male patients are more susceptible to severe intoxication