6,100 research outputs found

    Anomaly, Charge Quantization and Family

    Get PDF
    We first review the three known chiral anomalies in four dimensions and then use the anomaly free conditions to study the uniqueness of quark and lepton representations and charge quantizations in the standard model. We also extend our results to theory with an arbitrary number of color. Finally, we discuss the family problem.Comment: 7 pages, LaTex file, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Nonperturbative Methods and Lattice QCD, Guangzhou, Chin

    Constraints on the Timeon Model

    Full text link
    The timeon model recently proposed by Friedberg and Lee has a potential problem of flavor changing neutral currents (FCNCs) if the mass of the timeon is small. In order to avoid, we introduce a small dimensionless parameter to suppress FCNCs. Even in this case, we find that the timeon mass must be larger than 151 GeV to satisfy all the constraints from processes involving FCNCs in the quark sectors. We also extend the timeon model to the lepton sector and examine the leptonic processes.Comment: 10 pages, 1 figure, published version in PR

    Search for XYZXYZ states in Λb\Lambda_b decays at the LHCb

    Get PDF
    We consider X(3872)X(3872) and Y(4140)Y(4140) as the vector tetraquark states of Xc0≡ccˉuuˉ(ddˉ)X_c^0\equiv c\bar c u\bar u(d\bar d) and ccˉssˉc\bar c s\bar s, respectively. By connecting Λb→Xc0Λ\Lambda_b\to X_c^0\Lambda to B−→Xc0K−B^-\to X_c^0 K^-, we predict that the branching ratios of Λb→Λ(X(3872)0→)J/ψπ+π−\Lambda_b\to \Lambda(X(3872)^0\to) J/\psi \pi^+\pi^- and Λb→Λ(Y(4140)→)J/ψϕ\Lambda_b\to \Lambda(Y(4140)\to) J/\psi \phi are (5.2±1.8)×10−6(5.2\pm 1.8)\times 10^{-6} and (4.7±2.6)×10−6(4.7\pm 2.6)\times 10^{-6}, which are accessible to the experiments at the LHCb, respectively. The measurements of these Λb\Lambda_b modes would be the first experimental evidences for the XYZXYZ states in baryonic decays.Comment: 7 pages, 1 figure

    Radiative Baryonic BB Decays

    Get PDF
    We study the structure-dependent contributions to the radiative baryonic BB decays of B→BBˉ′γB \to {\bf B}{\bf \bar B'}\gamma in the standard model. We show that the decay branching ratios of Br(B→BBˉ′γ)Br(B \to {\bf B}{\bf \bar B'}\gamma) are O(10−7)O(10^{-7}), which are larger than the estimated values of O(10−9)O(10^{-9}) induced from inner bremsstrahlung effects of the corresponding two-body modes. In particular, we find that Br(B−→Λpˉγ)Br(B^- \to \Lambda \bar p \gamma) is around 1×10−61 \times 10^{-6}, which is close to the pole model estimation but smaller than the experimental measurement from BELLE.Comment: 11 pages, 2 figures, Revtex4, new fitting is include

    Pentaquarks from intrinsic charms in Λb\Lambda_b decays

    Get PDF
    We study the three-body Λb\Lambda_b decays of Λb→J/ψpM\Lambda_b\to J/\psi pM with M=K−M=K^- and π−\pi^-. The two new states Pc1≡Pc(4380)+{\cal P}_{c1}\equiv {\cal P}_c(4380)^+ and Pc2≡Pc(4450)+{\cal P}_{c2}\equiv {\cal P}_c(4450)^+ observed recently as the resonances in the J/ψpJ/\psi p invariant mass spectrum of Λb→J/ψpK−\Lambda_b\to J/\psi p K^- can be identified to consist of five quarks, uudccˉuudc\bar c, being consistent with the existence of the pentaquark states. We argue that, in the doubly charmful Λb\Lambda_b decays of Λb→J/ψpK−\Lambda_b\to J/\psi pK^- through b→ccˉsb\to c\bar c s, apart from those through the non-resonant Λb→pK−\Lambda_b\to pK^- and resonant Λb→Λ∗→pK−\Lambda_b\to \Lambda^*\to pK^- transitions, the third contribution with the non-factorizable effects is not the dominant part for the resonant Λb→K−Pc1,c2,Pc1,c2→J/ψp\Lambda_b\to K^-{\cal P}_{c1,c2}, {\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to J/\psi p processes, such that we propose that the Pc1,c2{\cal P}_{c1,c2} productions are mainly from the charmless Λb\Lambda_b decays through b→uˉusb\to \bar u u s, in which the ccˉc\bar c content in Pc1,c2{\cal P}_{c1,c2} arises from the intrinsic charms within the Λb\Lambda_b baryon. We hence predict the observables related to the branching ratios and the direct CP violating asymmetries to be B(Λb→π−(Pc1,c2→)J/ψp)/B(Λb→K−(Pc1,c2→)J/ψp)=0.8±0.1{\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to \pi^-({\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to) J/\psi p)/{\cal B}(\Lambda_b\to K^-({\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to) J/\psi p)=0.8\pm 0.1, ACP(Λb→π−(Pc1,c2→)J/ψp)=(−3.9±0.2)%{\cal A}_{CP}(\Lambda_b\to \pi^-({\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to)J/\psi p)=(-3.9\pm 0.2)\%, and ACP(Λb→K−(Pc1,c2→)J/ψp)=(5.8±0.2)%{\cal A}_{CP}(\Lambda_b\to K^-({\cal P}_{c1,c2}\to)J/\psi p)=(5.8\pm 0.2)\%, which can alleviate the inconsistency between the theoretical expectations from the three contributions in the doubly charmful Λb\Lambda_b decays and the observed data.Comment: 10 pages, 2 figures, revised version accepted by PL
    • …
    corecore