The Effects of Early Intervention on Language Growth after age 3 for Children with Permanent Hearing Loss

Purpose: The overall goal of this study was to examine language performance in children with permanent hearing loss who were enrolled in a Listening and Spoken Language program. The influence of time spent in Early Intervention (EI) on language trajectories and ability to attain age-appropriate language skills was examined. Methods: Retrospective data were obtained from children (N=48) who attended Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) for various lengths of time between 2004 and 2017. Children were grouped into those who had received EI prior to age 3 years versus those who did not. Standardized tests of receptive and expressive language were administered annually. Comparisons of language levels attained at the initial and final assessment were conducted and linear mixed model analyses examined language scores over time. Results: Children receiving EI attained significantly higher levels of language than those receiving no EI. The rate of improvement over time in vocabulary scores was similar for both groups, however on a global language test that included morpho-syntax, children with EI made greater progress relative to age-matched peers than children without EI. Conclusions: Children receiving EI exhibited a lasting advantage in the acquisition of spoken language over children who did not have access to EI

Effects of Frequency of Early Intervention on Spoken Language and Literacy Levels of Children Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing in Preschool and Elementary School

Language delays associated with hearing loss during infancy may have a negative impact on academic development throughout childhood. Early intervention provided by the Moog Center for Deaf Education prior to 36 months of age was quantified, and associations with later outcomes were examined for 50 students who are DHH representing Moog Center alumni. The objective was to determine whether the amount of early intervention (referred to hereafter as dose of early intervention received at the Moog Center during the time children were 0-36 months of age) contributed uniquely to outcomes in preschool (4–6 years) and in elementary school (8–14 years). Analysis of language and reading outcomes concluded that greater doses of early intervention were beneficial, even when other contributing factors such as degree of hearing loss, nonverbal intelligence, and age at first intervention were taken into account. Those children with poor aided speech perception scores in preschool exhibited the most benefit from early intensive intervention. Average language scores were within the expected range in comparison with hearing peers in preschool and remained within expectation when assessed an average of four years later in elementary school. The intensity of early intervention provided at the Moog Center contributed significantly to long-term development of language and literacy over and above the benefits associated with the age at which intervention was delivered

The James Webb Space Telescope Mission

Twenty-six years ago a small committee report, building on earlier studies, expounded a compelling and poetic vision for the future of astronomy, calling for an infrared-optimized space telescope with an aperture of at least $4m$. With the support of their governments in the US, Europe, and Canada, 20,000 people realized that vision as the $6.5m$ James Webb Space Telescope. A generation of astronomers will celebrate their accomplishments for the life of the mission, potentially as long as 20 years, and beyond. This report and the scientific discoveries that follow are extended thank-you notes to the 20,000 team members. The telescope is working perfectly, with much better image quality than expected. In this and accompanying papers, we give a brief history, describe the observatory, outline its objectives and current observing program, and discuss the inventions and people who made it possible. We cite detailed reports on the design and the measured performance on orbit.Comment: Accepted by PASP for the special issue on The James Webb Space Telescope Overview, 29 pages, 4 figure

The Science Performance of JWST as Characterized in Commissioning

This paper characterizes the actual science performance of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), as determined from the six month commissioning period. We summarize the performance of the spacecraft, telescope, science instruments, and ground system, with an emphasis on differences from pre-launch expectations. Commissioning has made clear that JWST is fully capable of achieving the discoveries for which it was built. Moreover, almost across the board, the science performance of JWST is better than expected; in most cases, JWST will go deeper faster than expected. The telescope and instrument suite have demonstrated the sensitivity, stability, image quality, and spectral range that are necessary to transform our understanding of the cosmos through observations spanning from near-earth asteroids to the most distant galaxies.Comment: 5th version as accepted to PASP; 31 pages, 18 figures; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1538-3873/acb29

Spoken word recognition in adolescent cochlear implant users during quiet and multispeaker babble conditions

Objective: To assess overall speech intelligibility in adolescent cochlear implant speakers during quiet and multispeaker babble conditions. Study Design: A cross-sectional assessment of intelligibility incorporating group (auditory-oral versus total communication speakers), sentence context (high versus low contexts), and background conditions (quiet versus multispeaker babble). Setting: A camp designed to assess adolescents over a concentrated period. Participants: Fifty-seven adolescents who participated in an earlier study when they were 8 to 9 years old examining functional outcomes of speech perception, speech production, and language were asked to participate in follow-up study. Methods: Speech intelligibility was assessed by asking the adolescents to repeat sentences. Sentences were digitally edited and played to normal hearing listeners who either provided broad transcriptions of sound accuracy or wrote down the words they understood when the sentences were presented in quiet and in multispeaker babble. Main Outcome Variable: The dependent variables were percent correct consonants, vowels, and total words identified. Results: Very few substitutions or omissions occurred, resulting in high levels of accuracy for consonants and vowels. Speech intelligibility in quiet was significantly greater than in the multispeaker babble condition. Multispeaker babble decreased performance uniformly across sentence context for the 2 groups. Conclusion: Accurate consonant production based on measures of substitutions and omissions fails to account for distortions and allophonic variations. Reductions in speech intelligibility relative to the phoneme correct productions suggest that the allophonic variations related to distortions may influence naive listener\u27s ability to understand the speech of profoundly deaf individuals. Copyright © 2011 Otology & Neurotology, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited

Factors influencing speech production in elementary and high school-aged cochlear implant users.

The objectives of this study were to (a) evaluate changes in speech intelligibility in a group of 110 adolescent users of cochlear implants who were first assessed in elementary school (CI-E) and later in high school (CI-HS) and (b) examine factors influencing speech intelligibility performance at the CI-E and CI-HS sessions. Participants were 110 adolescents who participated in an earlier study examining 181 young elementary school-aged children. Primary outcome measures included speech intelligibility under quiet and multispeaker background conditions and consonants correct produced in the sentences. Multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate how participant, family, and performance measures influenced their speech production during adolescence. Performance measures included estimates of speech perception, working memory, sign enhancement, and duration of seven-syllable sentences. Participant and family measures included duration of deafness, performance intelligence quotients, gender, family size, and socioeconomic status. Principal component analyses were used to construct common variables across highly intercorrelated measures. Three sets of multiple linear regressions evaluated the contributions of the variables to the variance associated with adolescent speech intelligibility. Speech intelligibility and consonants correct significantly increased nearly 22% between the two test sessions. Speech intelligibility significantly decreased by approximately 20% in the multispeaker babble condition relative to the quiet condition. Duration of seven-syllable sentences significantly decreased during the two test sessions. Data revealed that 65.8% of the variance in adolescent speech intelligibility was predicted from participant, family, and performance measures observed in elementary school. Forty-nine percent of the variance at adolescence was accounted for by the participant, family, and performance measures observed during the high school test session. Evaluation of variance including participant and family measures at both time periods, in conjunction with the adolescent performance measures, accounted for 49% of the variance in adolescence performance. After contributions from participant and family variables at the elementary and adolescent test sessions were removed, 21% of the variance in adolescent speech intelligibility was due to the performance measures at adolescence. Independent predictors of performance at adolescence included negative effects of sign enhancement and duration of seven-syllable sentences. Substantial improvements were made in consonant accuracy, sentence duration, and speech intelligibility between elementary and high school test sessions. Reductions in speech intelligibility performance suggest that allophonic variations, distortions, or use of speech sounds in a nonambient language may contribute to the reductions observed in multispeaker background conditions. Although a significant amount of variance in adolescent performance is accounted for by participant and family characteristics, elementary school speech production and an early reliance on speaking and listening independently account for variance in adolescence speech intelligibility. Over and beyond all the contributions made by participant, family and performance measures, greater reliance on oral communication, and shorter sentence durations independently account for variance at adolescence

Assessing consonant production in children with cochlear implants

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the development of consonant inventory and accuracy in pediatric cochlear implant (CI) recipients and compare their performance to typical hearing (TH) children. Methods: One hundred and twenty nine children with CIs, implanted between 6–38 months of age, and 30 age-matched children with TH participated in this study. Spontaneous speech samples were collected at 3.5 and 4.5 years chronological age and the first 100 different words spoken by each participant were transcribed. Two consonant production measures were subsequently calculated to assess consonant acquisition and mastery. The percentage of Consonants Correct (CC) was used for measuring accuracy and Consonant Diversity (CD), an inventory measure, was used to identify the number of different consonants spoken by each participant. Repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted to examine the differences in consonant production scores based on presence of CI (participants with CI versus typical hearing (TH) participants), and chronological age at data collection (3.5 years versus 4.5 years). Results: CI recipients displayed lower consonant production scores compared to TH children. Children with the most device experience (32–38 months at 3.5 years) performed on par with their TH peers. Conclusions: The two measures used in this study together appear capable of comprehensively describing the changes in consonant production skills of children. Results from this study indicate that while most CI participants display lower scores compared to TH children, many of the CI users are able to produce speech sounds on par with TH children