6 research outputs found

    Measurement of the branching fractions for Cabibbo-suppressed decays D+K+Kπ+π0D^{+}\to K^{+} K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0} and D(s)+K+ππ+π0D_{(s)}^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0} at Belle

    No full text
    International audienceWe present measurements of the branching fractions for the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays D+K+Kπ+π0D^+\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0} and Ds+K+ππ+π0D_s^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}, and the doubly Cabibbo-suppressed decay D+K+ππ+π0D^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}, based on 980 fb1{\rm fb}^{-1} of data recorded by the Belle experiment at the KEKB e+ee^{+}e^{-} collider. We measure these modes relative to the Cabibbo-favored modes D+Kπ+π+π0D^{+}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{0} and Ds+K+Kπ+π0D_s^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}. Our results for the ratios of branching fractions are B(D+K+Kπ+π0)/B(D+Kπ+π+π0)=(11.32±0.13±0.26)%B(D^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0})/B(D^{+}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) = (11.32 \pm 0.13 \pm 0.26)\%, B(D+K+ππ+π0)/B(D+Kπ+π+π0)=(1.68±0.11±0.03)%B(D^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0})/B(D^{+}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) = (1.68 \pm 0.11\pm 0.03)\%, and B(Ds+K+ππ+π0)/B(Ds+K+Kπ+π0)=(17.13±0.62±0.51)%B(D_s^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0})/B(D_s^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) = (17.13 \pm 0.62 \pm 0.51)\%, where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively. The second value corresponds to (5.83±0.42)×tan4θC(5.83\pm 0.42)\times\tan^4\theta_C, where θC\theta_C is the Cabibbo angle; this value is larger than other measured ratios of branching fractions for a doubly Cabibbo-suppressed charm decay to a Cabibbo-favored decay. Multiplying these results by world average values for B(D+Kπ+π+π0)B(D^{+}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) and B(Ds+K+Kπ+π0)B(D_s^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) yields B(D+K+Kπ+π0)=(7.08±0.08±0.16±0.20)×103B(D^{+}\to K^{+}K^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0})= (7.08\pm 0.08\pm 0.16\pm 0.20)\times10^{-3}, B(D+K+ππ+π0)=(1.05±0.07±0.02±0.03)×103B(D^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0})= (1.05\pm 0.07\pm 0.02\pm 0.03)\times10^{-3}, and B(Ds+K+ππ+π0)=(9.44±0.34±0.28±0.32)×103B(D_s^{+}\to K^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{+}\pi^{0}) = (9.44\pm 0.34\pm 0.28\pm 0.32)\times10^{-3}, where the third uncertainty is due to the branching fraction of the normalization mode. The first two results are consistent with, but more precise than, the current world averages. The last result is the first measurement of this branching fraction

    Measurement of branching fractions of Λc+pKS0KS0\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0K_S^0 and Λc+pKS0η\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0\eta at Belle

    No full text
    We present a study of a singly Cabibbo-suppressed decay Λc+pKS0KS0\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0K_S^0 and a Cabibbo-favored decay Λc+pKS0η\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0\eta based on 980 fb1\rm fb^{-1} of data collected by the Belle detector, operating at the KEKB energy-asymmetric e+ee^+e^- collider. We measure their branching fractions relative to Λc+pKS0\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0: B(Λc+pKS0KS0)/B(Λc+pKS0)=(1.48±0.08±0.04)×102\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0K_S^0)/\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0)={(1.48 \pm 0.08 \pm 0.04)\times 10^{-2}} and B(Λc+pKS0η)/B(Λc+pKS0)=(2.73±0.06±0.13)×101\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0\eta)/\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0)={(2.73\pm 0.06\pm 0.13)\times 10^{-1}}. Combining with the world average B(Λc+pKS0)\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0), we have the absolute branching fractions: B(Λc+pKS0KS0)=(2.35±0.12±0.07±0.12)×104\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0K_S^0) = {(2.35\pm 0.12\pm 0.07 \pm 0.12 )\times 10^{-4}} and B(Λc+pKS0η)=(4.35±0.10±0.20±0.22)×103\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0\eta) = {(4.35\pm 0.10\pm 0.20 \pm 0.22 )\times 10^{-3}}. The first and second uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively, while the third ones arise from the uncertainty on B(Λc+pKS0)\mathcal{B}(\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0). The mode Λc+pKS0KS0\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0K_S^0 is observed for the first time and has a statistical significance of > ⁣10σ>\!10\sigma. The branching fraction of Λc+pKS0η\Lambda_c^+\to{}pK_S^0\eta has been measured with a threefold improvement in precision over previous results and is found to be consistent with the world average
    corecore