2 research outputs found

    A Modified Intramedullary Nail Interlocking Design Yields Improved Stability for Fatigue Cycling in a Canine Femur Fracture Model

    Full text link
    Intramedullary nailing has evolved to become the standard of care for most diaphyseal femoral and tibial fractures, as well as an expanding number of metaphyseal fractures. Owing to the unstable nature of some fractures, the intramedullary device may be subjected to significant stresses owing to a lack of solid cortical contact after nailing. In such cases, excessive interfragmentary motion (due to construct toggle) has been shown to occur. Such motion increases the likelihood of a non- or delayed-union. In the current study, two versions of a modified, angle stable interlocking design were subjected to fatigue testing in a segmental defect fracture model representing a canine femur. As a control, a third group of constructs were stabilized with a traditional nail that allowed a small amount of toggle. All constructs were subjected to 50,000 fatigue cycles representing 12 weeks of cage activity at physiologic levels of combined axial-torsional loading. Torsional testing pre- and post-fatigue revealed 4.6 ± 1.3° of toggle in the traditional nail and no toggle with the angle stable nail designs. The stable nails were also significantly stiffer in axial compression and torsion before and after cycling. These data indicate that the enhanced stability of the modified interlocking designs can be maintained throughout fatigue cycling in a challenging fracture model

    Angle Stable Nails Provide Improved Healing for a Complex Fracture Model in the Femur

    Full text link
    Background Conventional nails are being used for an expanding range of fractures from simple to more complex. Angle stable designs are a relatively new innovation; however, it is unknown if they will improve healing for complex fractures. Questions/purposes When comparing traditional and angle stable nails to treat complex open canine femur fractures, the current study addressed the following questions: do the two constructs differ in (1) radiographic evidence of bone union across the cortices; (2) stability as determined by toggle (torsional motion with little accompanying torque) and angular deformation; (3) biomechanical properties, including stiffness in bending, axial compression, and torsional loading, and construct failure properties in torsion; and (4) degree of bone tissue mineralization? Methods Ten hounds with a 1-cm femoral defect and periosteal stripping were treated with a reamed titanium angle stable or nonangle stable nail after the creation of a long soft tissue wound. Before the study, the animals were randomly assigned to receive one of the nails and to be evaluated with biomechanical testing or histology. After euthanasia at 16 weeks, all operative femora were assessed radiographically. Histological or biomechanical evaluation was conducted of the operative bones with nails left in situ compared with the nonoperative contralateral femora. Results Radiographic and gross inspection demonstrated hypertrophic nonunion in all 10 animals treated with the nonangle stable nail, whereas six of 10 animals treated with the angle stable nail bridged at least one cortex (p = 0.023). The angle stable nail construct demonstrated no toggle in nine of 10 animals, whereas all control femora exhibited toggle. The angle stable nail demonstrated less angular deformation and toggle (p ≤ 0.005) and increased compressive stiffness (p = 0.001) compared with the conventional nonangle stable nail. Histology demonstrated more nonmineralized tissue in the limbs treated with the conventional nail (p = 0.005). Conclusions Angle stable nails that eliminate toggle lead to enhanced yet incomplete fracture healing in a complex canine fracture model. Clinical Relevance Care should be taken in tailoring the nail design features to the characteristics of the fracture and the patient
    corecore