3 research outputs found

    Scoring tools to identify TB patients facing catastrophic costs in the Philippines.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: This study was to meet a practical need to design a simple tool to identify TB patients who may potentially be facing catastrophic costs while seeking TB care in the public sector. Such a tool may help prevent and address catastrophic costs among individual patients. METHODS: We used data from the national TB patient cost survey in the Philippines. We randomly allocated TB patients to either the derivation or validation sample. Using adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and β coefficients of logistic regression, we developed four scoring systems to identify TB patients who may be facing catastrophic costs from the derivation sample. We validated each scoring system in the validation sample. RESULTS: We identified a total of 12 factors as predictive indicators associated with catastrophic costs. Using all 12 factors, the β coefficients-based scoring system (area under the curve [AUC] 0.783, 95% CI 0.754-0.812) had a high validity. Even with seven selected factors with OR > 2.0, the validity remained in the acceptable range (β coefficients-based: AUC 0.767, 95% CI 0.737-0.798). CONCLUSION: The β coefficients-based scoring systems in this analysis can be used to identify those at high risk of facing catastrophic costs due to TB in the Philippines. Operational feasibility needs to be investigated further to implement this in routine TB surveillance

    Cost of TB prevention and treatment in the Philippines in 2017.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The Philippines aims to accelerate TB reduction through the provision of universally accessible and affordable services. The objectives of this paper are to estimate the costs of TB services and interventions using a health systems´ perspective, and to explore cost differences in service delivery via primary care facilities or hospitals.METHODS: Data were collected from a multi-stage stratified random sampling of 28 facilities in accordance with Global Health Cost Consortium costing standards and analysis tools. Unit costs (in US)estimatedusingtop−down(TD)andbottom−up(BU)approaches,aresummarisedfollowingValueTBreportingstandardsandbybroadfacilitytype.RESULTS:Costofdelivering32TBservicesandeightinterventionsvariedbycostingmethodanddeliveryplatform.AverageBUcostsrangedfromUS) estimated using top-down (TD) and bottom-up (BU) approaches, are summarised following Value TB reporting standards and by broad facility type.RESULTS: Cost of delivering 32 TB services and eight interventions varied by costing method and delivery platform. Average BU costs ranged from US0.38 for treatment support visits, US2.5forBCGvaccination,US2.5 for BCG vaccination, US19.48 for the Xpert® MTB/RIF test to US$3,677 for MDR-TB treatment using the long regimen. Delivering TB care in hospitals was generally more costly than in primary care facilities, except for TB prevention in children and MDR-TB treatment using the long regimen.CONCLUSION: Comprehensive costing data for TB care in the Philippines are now available to aid in the design, planning, and prioritisation of delivery models to End TB

    Snakebites in Colombia

    No full text
    corecore