191 research outputs found
Fokker-Planck and Landau-Lifshitz-Bloch Equations for Classical Ferromagnets
A macroscopic equation of motion for the magnetization of a ferromagnet at
elevated temperatures should contain both transverse and longitudinal
relaxation terms and interpolate between Landau-Lifshitz equation at low
temperatures and the Bloch equation at high temperatures. It is shown that for
the classical model where spin-bath interactions are described by stochastic
Langevin fields and spin-spin interactions are treated within the mean-field
approximation (MFA), such a ``Landau-Lifshitz-Bloch'' (LLB) equation can be
derived exactly from the Fokker-Planck equation, if the external conditions
change slowly enough. For weakly anisotropic ferromagnets within the MFA the
LLB equation can be written in a macroscopic form based on the free-energy
functional interpolating between the Landau free energy near T_C and the
``micromagnetic'' free energy, which neglects changes of the magnetization
magnitude |{\bf M}|, at low temperatures.Comment: 9 pages, no figures, a small error correcte
Bloch-Wall Phase Transition in the Spherical Model
The temperature-induced second-order phase transition from Bloch to linear
(Ising-like) domain walls in uniaxial ferromagnets is investigated for the
model of D-component classical spin vectors in the limit D \to \infty. This
exactly soluble model is equivalent to the standard spherical model in the
homogeneous case, but deviates from it and is free from unphysical behavior in
a general inhomogeneous situation. It is shown that the thermal fluctuations of
the transverse magnetization in the wall (the Bloch-wall order parameter)
result in the diminishing of the wall transition temperature T_B in comparison
to its mean-field value, thus favouring the existence of linear walls. For
finite values of T_B an additional anisotropy in the basis plane x,y is
required; in purely uniaxial ferromagnets a domain wall behaves like a
2-dimensional system with a continuous spin symmetry and does not order into
the Bloch one.Comment: 16 pages, 2 figure
Nonlinear response of superparamagnets with finite damping: an analytical approach
The strongly damping-dependent nonlinear dynamical response of classical
superparamagnets is investigated by means of an analytical approach. Using
rigorous balance equations for the spin occupation numbers a simple approximate
expression is derived for the nonlinear susceptibility. The results are in good
agreement with those obtained from the exact (continued-fraction) solution of
the Fokker-Planck equation. The formula obtained could be of assistance in the
modelling of the experimental data and the determination of the damping
coefficient in superparamagnets.Comment: 7 PR pages, 2 figure
Quantum Nonlinear Switching Model
We present a method, the dynamical cumulant expansion, that allows to
calculate quantum corrections for time-dependent quantities of interacting spin
systems or single spins with anisotropy. This method is applied to the
quantum-spin model \hat{H} = -H_z(t)S_z + V(\bf{S}) with H_z(\pm\infty) =
\pm\infty and \Psi (-\infty)=|-S> we study the quantity P(t)=(1-_t/S)/2.
The case V(\bf{S})=-H_x S_x corresponds to the standard
Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg model of tunneling at avoided-level crossing for N=2S
independent particles mapped onto a single-spin-S problem, P(t) being the
staying probability. Here the solution does not depend on S and follows, e.g.,
from the classical Landau-Lifshitz equation. A term -DS_z^2 accounts for
particles' interaction and it makes the model nonlinear and essentially quantum
mechanical. The 1/S corrections obtained with our method are in a good accord
with a full quantum-mechanical solution if the classical motion is regular, as
for D>0.Comment: 4 Phys. Rev. pages 2 Fig
Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg effect in a model of interacting tunneling systems
The Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg (LZS) effect in a model system of interacting
tunneling particles is studied numerically and analytically. Each of N
tunneling particles interacts with each of the others with the same coupling J.
This problem maps onto that of the LZS effect for a large spin S=N/2. The
mean-field limit N=>\infty corresponds to the classical limit S=>\infty for the
effective spin. It is shown that the ferromagnetic coupling J>0 tends to
suppress the LZS transitions. For N=>\infty there is a critical value of J
above which the staying probability P does not go to zero in the slow sweep
limit, unlike the standard LZS effect. In the same limit for J>0 LZS
transitions are boosted and P=0 for a set of finite values of the sweep rate.
Various limiting cases such as strong and weak interaction, slow and fast sweep
are considered analytically. It is shown that the mean-field approach works
well for arbitrary N if the interaction J is weak.Comment: 13 PR pages, 15 Fig
Quantum statistical metastability for a finite spin
We study quantum-classical escape-rate transitions for uniaxial and biaxial
models with finite spins S=10 (such as Mn_12Ac and Fe_8) and S=100 by a direct
numerical approach. At second-order transitions the level making a dominant
contribution into thermally assisted tunneling changes gradually with
temperature whereas at first-order transitions a group of levels is skipped.
For finite spins, the quasiclassical boundaries between first- and second-order
transitions are shifted, favoring a second-order transition: For Fe_8 in zero
field the transition should be first order according to a theory with S \to
\infty, but we show that there are no skipped levels at the transition.
Applying a field along the hard axis in Fe_8 makes transition the strongest
first order. For the same model with S=100 we confirmed the existence of a
region where a second-order transition is followed by a first-order transition
[X. Martines Hidalgo and E. M. Chudnovsky, J. Phys.: Condensed Matter (in
press)].Comment: 7 Phys. Rev. pages, 10 figures, submitted to PR
Phase transition between quantum and classical regimes for the escape rate of a biaxial spin system
Employing the method of mapping the spin problem onto a particle one, we have
derived the particle Hamiltonian for a biaxial spin system with a transverse or
longitudinal magnetic field. Using the Hamiltonian and introducing the
parameter where (U_{min})
corresponds to the top (bottom) of the potential and is the energy of the
particle, we have studied the first- or second-order transition around the
crossover temperature between thermal and quantum regimes for the escape rate,
depending on the anisotropy constant and the external magnetic field. It is
shown that the phase boundary separating the first- and second-order transition
and its crossover temperature are greatly influenced by the transverse
anisotropy constant as well as the transverse or longitudinal magnetic field.Comment: 5 pages + 3 figures, to be published in Phys. Rev.
Quantum dynamics of a nanomagnet in a rotating field
Quantum dynamics of a two-state spin system in a rotating magnetic field has
been studied. Analytical and numerical results for the transition probability
have been obtained along the lines of the Landau-Zener-Stueckelberg theory. The
effect of various kinds of noise on the evolution of the system has been
analyzed.Comment: 7 pages, 7 figure
The 1/D Expansion for Classical Magnets: Low-Dimensional Models with Magnetic Field
The field-dependent magnetization m(H,T) of 1- and 2-dimensional classical
magnets described by the -component vector model is calculated analytically
in the whole range of temperature and magnetic fields with the help of the 1/D
expansion. In the 1-st order in 1/D the theory reproduces with a good accuracy
the temperature dependence of the zero-field susceptibility of antiferromagnets
\chi with the maximum at T \lsim |J_0|/D (J_0 is the Fourier component of the
exchange interaction) and describes for the first time the singular behavior of
\chi(H,T) at small temperatures and magnetic fields: \lim_{T\to 0}\lim_{H\to 0}
\chi(H,T)=1/(2|J_0|)(1-1/D) and \lim_{H\to 0}\lim_{T\to 0}
\chi(H,T)=1/(2|J_0|)
Π‘ΠΠΠΠ’Π ΠΠΠΠ’Π ΠΠΠ― ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠΠΠΠ Β«ΠΠ ΠΠΠ-ΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ Π’Β». Π‘ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ Π‘ΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠ―ΠΠΠ Π ΠΠΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠ§ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π’Π
This paper presents the characteristics of the modern Grand-Expert spectrometer for the analysis of metals and alloys. The spectrometer has an updated optical scheme and a new spectrum analyzer to solve a wide range of analytical tasks. The analytical capabilities of the spectrometer were investigated for the analysis of steels and high-purity copper and aluminum as an example. For each of the bases, the updated optical scheme made it possible to realize new opportunities for controlling the homogeneity of the sample material and the presence of micro-inclusions on the sample surface and for determining low impurity contents in the pure metal bases. The spectrometer uses a modern semiconductor spark generator with adjustable frequency, current intensity, and duration of individual spark pulses. Spectra of metal samples for individual spark pulses were obtained in real time for the investigated sample. The operation of the spectrometer in different modes and with different exposure times was tested to select the optimal parameters of calibration characteristics. Computer control provides full synchronization of the generator mode setting, argon feeding, and spectrum registration. For steels, we selected sparking modes with high stability of spectral line intensities and analyte concentrations, and for pure metals (copper and aluminum), modes providing low detection limits of impurity elements and good stability of the results.Keywords: optical spectrometry, atomic-emission spectrometer, spectral analyzer, MAES, determination of metal compositionΒ DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/analitika.2021.25.4.008V.G. Garanin Β VMK-Optoelektronika, ul. Akademika Koptyuga 1, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian FederationΠ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ² ΠΈ ΡΠΏΠ»Π°Π²ΠΎΠ² Β«ΠΡΠ°Π½Π΄-ΠΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΒ» Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΡΡΠ³ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π·Π°Π΄Π°Ρ. Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΡΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΉ, Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΈ Π°Π»ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»Π° ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Ρ ΠΈ Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ
Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ. Π ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΉ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡ, ΡΠΈΠ»Ρ ΡΠΎΠΊΠ° ΠΈ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠΎΠ² Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Ρ. ΠΠ»Ρ Π²ΡΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² Π³ΡΠ°Π΄ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ° Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠ°Ρ
ΠΈ Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΡΠΌ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅ΠΌ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΡ ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ² Π³Π΅Π½Π΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ°, ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΠΈ Π°ΡΠ³ΠΎΠ½Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ² (ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΈ Π°Π»ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡ) Π²ΡΠ±ΡΠ°Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ²-ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ Ρ
ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π±ΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ².ΠΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π°: ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ, Π°ΡΠΎΠΌΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ, ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΎΡ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ², ΠΠΠΠ‘, ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ²DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/analitika.2021.25.4.00
- β¦