Effects of a multi-faceted program to increase influenza vaccine coverage among health care workers:A hospital-based cluster randomized controlled trial

Background: Immunizing health care workers (HCWs) against influenza has proven to protect their patients. Despite recommentations of the World Health Organization and the Dutch Health Council, influenza vaccine uptake among hospital HCWs remains low in the Netherlands Objectives: To assess the effects of implementing a hospital- based multi-faceted influenza immunization program on vaccine coverage in health care workers (HCW) and on patient morbidity. Methods: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial among all eight University Medical Centers (UMC) of The Netherlands during the influenza seasons of 2009- 2010 and 2010-2011. Participants were hospital staff of three intervention (n = 27,900 in 2009), three control (n = 22,451) and two external non-randomized intervention UMCs (n = 16,893), and 3,367 patients admitted to the departments of pediatrics and internal medicine during both influenza epidemics. We offered a vaccination implementation progran to staff of intervention and external UMCs, but not to control UMCs. The primary outcome measure was influenza vaccine coverage among HCW. Secondary outcome measures were work absenteeism and patient morbidity. Results: In 2009, the coverage of seasonal, first pandemic and second pandemic vaccine was 32.3%, 61.7% and 45.8% in the intervention UMCs. Corresponding figures for control UMCs were significantly lower at 20.4%, 38.0%, and 17.8%, respectively (p <0.05). In 2010, the coverage of the seasonal vaccine was 28.6% and 17.8% in intervention and control UMCs, respectively (p <0.05). During their stay, influenza and/or pneumonia was reduced in patients of intervention UMCs compared to control UMCs (work in progress). Rates of HCWs' absenteeism and influenza testing rates during epidemics were higher in intervention than control UMCs. Conclusions: Adoption of the program improved the influenza vaccine coverage among hospital staff. An increase in coverage was associated with decreased patient morbidity from influenza and/or pneumonia

Planning and process evaluation of a multi-faceted influenza vaccination implementation strategy for health care workers in acute health care settings

BACKGROUND: Influenza transmitted by health care workers (HCWs) is a potential threat to frail patients in acute health care settings. Therefore, immunizing HCWs against influenza should receive high priority. Despite recommendations of the World Health Organization, vaccine coverage of HCWs remains low in all European countries. This study explores the use of intervention strategies and methods to improve influenza vaccination rates among HCWs in an acute care setting. METHODS: The Intervention Mapping (IM) method was used to systematically develop and implement an intervention strategy aimed at changing influenza vaccination behaviour among HCWs in Dutch University Medical Centres (UMCs). Carried out during the influenza seasons 2009/2010 and 2010/2011, the interventions were then qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated by way of feedback from participating UMCs and the completion of a web-based staff questionnaire in the following spring of each season. RESULTS: The IM method resulted in the development of a transparent influenza vaccination intervention implementation strategy. The intervention strategy was offered to six Dutch UMCs in a randomized in a clustered Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), where three UMCs were chosen for intervention, and three UMCs acted as controls. A further two UMCs elected to have the intervention. The qualitative process evaluation showed that HCWs at four of the five intervention UMCs were responsive to the majority of the 11 relevant behavioural determinants resulting from the needs assessment in their intervention strategy compared with only one of three control UMCs. The quantitative evaluation among a sample of HCWs revealed that of all the developed communication materials, HCWs reported the posters as the most noticeable. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that it is possible to develop a structured implementation strategy for increasing the rate of influenza vaccination by HCWs in acute health care settings. The evaluation also showed that it is impossible to expose all HCWs to all intervention methods (which would have been the best case scenario). Further study is needed to (1) improve HCW exposure to intervention methods; (2) determine the effect of such interventions on vaccine uptake among HCWs; and (3) assess the impact on clinical outcomes among patients when such interventions are enacted