Blockade of α2-adrenoceptors induces Arc gene expression in rat brain in a glutamate receptor-dependent manner: a combined qPCR, in situ hybridisation and immunocytochemistry study.

Studies of 5-HT-glutamate interactions suggest that activation of brain 5-HT(2A) receptors leads to an AMPA receptor-mediated induction of the immediate early (activity-dependent) gene, Arc (Arg3.1). In this respect, noradrenaline-glutamate interactions are poorly characterised. Here we investigated the influence on regional brain Arc gene expression of selective blockade of α(2)-adrenoceptors in rats. Several complementary techniques were used: qPCR (mRNA, discrete tissue punches), in situ hybridisation (mRNA, sections) and immunocytochemistry. The α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, RX 821002, dose-dependently and time-dependently (maximal effect 2 h) increased Arc mRNA levels as demonstrated both by qPCR and in situ hybridisation. The α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist, atipamezole, also increased Arc mRNA in in situ hybridisation studies. Changes in Arc mRNA after RX 821002 were of similar magnitude in punches and intact tissue sections and region-specific, with effects being most pronounced in parietal cortex and caudate putamen, less robust in frontal cortex, and not detectable in hippocampal sub-regions. Both qPCR and in situ hybridisation studies demonstrated that RX 821002-induced Arc mRNA was blocked by the AMPA antagonist, GYKI 52466. Pretreatment with the NMDA antagonist MK 801 also prevented RX 821002-induced Arc mRNA, as did the mGluR5 antagonist MPEP, whilst the mGluR2/3 antagonist, LY341495, had no effect. Finally, immunocytochemical studies showed that RX 821002 increased Arc-immunoreactivity in cells in close apposition to α(2)-adrenoceptor-positive processes. Thus, employing three complementary techniques, these observations demonstrate that blockade of α(2)-adrenoceptors triggers brain expression of the immediate early gene, Arc, and that this effect involves the recruitment of AMPA, NMDA and mGluR5 but not mGluR2/3 glutamatergic receptors

Endothelin-1 pathway in human alveolar epithelial cell line A549 and human umbilical vein endothelial cells

AIM: This study was designed to characterize the endothelin pathway in an immortalized human adenocarcinoma-derived alveolar epithelial cell line (A549) and human umbilical vein endothelial cell line (HUVEC). METHODS: The release of ET-1 and big-ET-1 was measured in the incubation medium of both cell lines. The expression of mRNAs coding for the endothelin isoforms (hppET-1, -2, -3), the endothelin converting enzymes (hECE-la, b, c, and d) and the hET(A) and hET(B) receptors was investigated using RT-PCR. The expression of ECE-1 mRNA in various human tissues and in A549 cells was investigated by Northern blot analysis and the subcellular localization of ECE-1 in A549 cells was investigated by immunoblotting using a polyclonal antibody. RESULTS: Under control conditions, HUVEC release both ET-1 and big- ET-1 (ratio 5 to 1) while in A549 cells the big-ET-1 levels were below the threshold of detection. The release of these two peptides was minimally affected by various inhibitors of peptidases. However, in both cell lines phosphoramidon produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of ET-1 release and an enhanced accumulation of big-ET-1. Both HUVEC and A549 cells express the mRNAs for ppET-1, ET-A, and ET-B receptor subtypes and ECE-1 (isoforms ECE-1b, c and/or d). In addition, in HUVEC the mRNAs for ppET-2 and for the isoform ECE-1a were also detected. In A549 cells, ECE-1 had a preferential subcellular localization in the membrane fraction but was not detected in the cytosol. CONCLUSION: Both A549 and HUVEC produce and release endothelin-1 through a specific enzymatic pathway, whether or not ECE-1 is the only enzyme involved remains to be determined. A549 might be used as a screening assay for drug discovery such as for inhibitors of endothelin-1 release.link_to_subscribed_fulltex

Regulation of murine airway responsiveness by endothelial nitric oxide synthase

Nitric oxide (NO) is a potent vasodilator, but it can also modulate contractile responses of the airway smooth muscle. Whether or not endothelial (e) NO synthase (NOS) contributes to the regulation of bronchial tone is unknown at present. Experiments were designed to investigate the isoforms of NOS that are expressed in murine airways and to determine whether or not the endogenous release of NO modulates bronchial tone in wild-type mice and in mice with targeted deletion of eNOS [eNOS(-/-)]. The presence of neuronal NOS (nNOS), inducible NOS (iNOS), and eNOS in murine trachea and lung parenchyma was assessed by RT-PCR, immunoblotting, and immunohistochemistry. Airway resistance was measured in conscious unrestrained mice by means of a whole body plethysmography chamber. The three isoforms of NOS were constitutively present in lungs of wild-type mice, whereas only iNOS and nNOS were present in eNOS(-/-) mice. Labeling of nNOS was localized in submucosal airway nerves but was not consistently detected, and iNOS immunoreactivity was observed in tracheal and bronchiolar epithelial cells, whereas eNOS was expressed in endothelial cells. In wild-type mice, treatment with N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, but not with aminoguanidine, potentiated the increase in airway resistance produced by inhalation of methacholine. eNOS(-/-) mice were hyperresponsive to inhaled methacholine and markedly less sensitive to N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. These results demonstrate that the three NOS isoforms are expressed constitutively in murine lung and that NO derived from eNOS plays a physiological role in controlling bronchial airway reactivity.link_to_subscribed_fulltex